• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务难度调节了走神对相位动力学的影响。

Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics.

作者信息

Long Zhengkun, Northoff Georg, Fu Xiaolan

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 3;122(22):e2416387122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416387122. Epub 2025 May 30.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2416387122
PMID:40445764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12146758/
Abstract

Mind wandering attenuates widespread sensory and motor processing, both of which are mediated by phase coherence. However, it remains unclear i) whether mind wandering impacts both sensory input and motor output processing by modulating ii) neural entrainment to external stimuli, as measured by intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), and specifically iii) whether task difficulty with different degrees of attentional demands moderates the impact of mind wandering on phase coherence. Using the thought-probe method, we assessed participants' attentional states during different sensory and motor tasks with varying task difficulty. We found that mind wandering decreased ITPC exclusively in less demanding tasks but not in difficult ones, regardless of whether the tasks involved visual input or motor output processing. Our results suggest that external task difficulty may modulate the balance between external and internal cognitive processing (e.g., mind wandering), with simpler tasks facilitating internally oriented cognition and increasing mind wandering. This balance between internal mind wandering and external task difficulty is mediated, in part, by phase coherence, which serves as an underlying neural mechanism. Collectively, our findings support the hypothesis that phase coherence and its dynamics (ITPC) play a key role in mediating the reciprocal balance of internal and external cognition-this suggests their partly shared cognitive-executive resources as entailed by the recently proposed Baseline model of cognition.

摘要

思绪游走会减弱广泛的感觉和运动处理,这两者均由相位相干性介导。然而,目前尚不清楚:其一,思绪游走是否通过调节其二,如通过试次间相位相干性(ITPC)所测量的,对外部刺激的神经同步化,来影响感觉输入和运动输出处理;具体而言其三,具有不同程度注意力需求的任务难度是否会调节思绪游走对相位相干性的影响。我们使用思维探测法,在不同难度的感觉和运动任务中评估参与者的注意力状态。我们发现,无论任务涉及视觉输入还是运动输出处理,思绪游走仅在要求较低的任务中降低ITPC,而在困难任务中则不会。我们的结果表明,外部任务难度可能会调节外部和内部认知处理(如思绪游走)之间的平衡,较简单的任务会促进内部导向的认知并增加思绪游走。内部思绪游走和外部任务难度之间的这种平衡部分由相位相干性介导,相位相干性是一种潜在的神经机制。总体而言,我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即相位相干性及其动态变化(ITPC)在介导内部和外部认知的相互平衡中起关键作用——这表明它们部分共享了最近提出的认知基线模型所涉及的认知执行资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/cf298191f0ba/pnas.2416387122fig07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/6eb1cdccf3ce/pnas.2416387122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/8f35c0242bbe/pnas.2416387122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/eb1664bfad06/pnas.2416387122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/68980daf3048/pnas.2416387122fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/28d0eebce4e7/pnas.2416387122fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/50c603674d28/pnas.2416387122fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/cf298191f0ba/pnas.2416387122fig07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/6eb1cdccf3ce/pnas.2416387122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/8f35c0242bbe/pnas.2416387122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/eb1664bfad06/pnas.2416387122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/68980daf3048/pnas.2416387122fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/28d0eebce4e7/pnas.2416387122fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/50c603674d28/pnas.2416387122fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/12146758/cf298191f0ba/pnas.2416387122fig07.jpg

相似文献

1
Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics.任务难度调节了走神对相位动力学的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 3;122(22):e2416387122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416387122. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
How mind wandering influences motor control: The modulating role of movement difficulty.思维游荡如何影响运动控制:运动难度的调节作用。
Neuroimage. 2024 Jul 1;294:120638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120638. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
Shaped by our thoughts--a new task to assess spontaneous cognition and its associated neural correlates in the default network.受我们的思想塑造——一项评估默认网络中自发认知及其相关神经关联的新任务。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Feb;93:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Effects of task type on spontaneous alternations of attentional states.任务类型对注意力状态自发交替的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):984-997. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01513-4. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
The role of task difficulty in theoretical accounts of mind wandering.任务难度在思维漫游理论解释中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Relationships between mind-wandering and attentional control abilities in young adults and adolescents.青年人和青少年的走神与注意力控制能力之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG.利用脑电图预测一般任务中的走神。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1059-1073. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00707-1.
8
Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.思维漫游、认知和表现:注意力调节的理论驱动元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1411-1431. doi: 10.1037/a0037428. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Word Familiarity Modulates the Interference Effects of Mind Wandering on Semantic and Reafferent Information Processing.词汇熟悉度调节走神对语义和再传入信息加工的干扰效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Aug 1;35(8):1229-1245. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02017.
10
The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.思维漫游的在线思维探测程序的有效性不会受到探测率和探测框架变化的威胁。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1846-1856. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01194-2. Epub 2019 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
How mind wandering influences motor control: The modulating role of movement difficulty.思维游荡如何影响运动控制:运动难度的调节作用。
Neuroimage. 2024 Jul 1;294:120638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120638. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Temporal imprecision of phase coherence in schizophrenia and psychosis-dynamic mechanisms and diagnostic marker.精神分裂症及精神病相位相干的时间不精确性:动力学机制与诊断标志物
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;29(2):425-438. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02337-z. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Temporal imprecision and phase instability in schizophrenia resting state EEG.
精神分裂症静息态 EEG 的时间不精确和相位不稳定。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Aug;86:103654. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103654. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Word Familiarity Modulates the Interference Effects of Mind Wandering on Semantic and Reafferent Information Processing.词汇熟悉度调节走神对语义和再传入信息加工的干扰效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Aug 1;35(8):1229-1245. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02017.
5
Prolonged Intrinsic Neural Timescales Dissociate from Phase Coherence in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症中延长的内在神经时间尺度与相位相干性分离。
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):695. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040695.
6
As without, so within: how the brain's temporo-spatial alignment to the environment shapes consciousness.外在如是,内在亦然:大脑与环境的时空校准如何塑造意识。
Interface Focus. 2023 Apr 14;13(3):20220076. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2022.0076. eCollection 2023 Jun 6.
7
Ecological momentary assessment of mind-wandering: meta-analysis and systematic review.心智游移的生态瞬间评估:元分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 18;13(1):2873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29854-9.
8
How visual attention span and phonological skills contribute to N170 print tuning: An EEG study in French dyslexic students.视觉注意力持续时间和语音技能如何影响 N170 印刷品调节:法国阅读障碍学生的 EEG 研究。
Brain Lang. 2022 Nov;234:105176. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105176. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
9
Electrophysiological markers of mind wandering: A systematic review.思维漫游的电生理标志物:系统综述。
Neuroimage. 2022 Sep;258:119372. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119372. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
10
Ongoing Brain Activity and Its Role in Cognition: Dual versus Baseline Models.持续脑活动及其在认知中的作用:双基线模型与基线模型的比较。
Neuroscientist. 2023 Aug;29(4):393-420. doi: 10.1177/10738584221081752. Epub 2022 May 25.