Jasim Saade Abdalkareem, Mohammed Jaafaru Sani, Roopashree Rangaswamy, Alshahrani Mohammad Y, Sharma Aanchal, Sharma Abhishek, Asliddin Shodiyev, Beig Masoumeh
Medical Laboratory Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Technology, University of Al-maarif, Anbar, Iraq.
Medical Analysis Department, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq.
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0323313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323313. eCollection 2025.
The emergence of antibiotic-resistant Elizabethkingia strains poses a significant challenge in clinical settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive assessment of the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among Elizabethkingia isolates across different regions worldwide.
A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from 1998 to January 9, 2024, using predefined search strategies. Eligible studies reporting antibiotic resistance in Elizabethkingia were included. A random-effects model was applied to estimate resistance proportions and assess heterogeneity. Additional analyses, including meta-regression, subgroup evaluations, and assessments of outliers and influential studies, were performed to explore resistance trends and evaluate publication bias. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist, and all statistical analyses were conducted using R with the metafor package.
A total of 1,016 articles were identified, of which 34 studies (47 reports) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis indicated high resistance to ceftazidime (88.5% of isolates, 95% CI: 21.1%-99.5%) with no significant heterogeneity. Resistance to rifampin was 12.5% (95% CI: 5.9%-24.7%), showing substantial heterogeneity, while ciprofloxacin resistance was 27.9% (95% CI: 13.8%-48.4%) with considerable heterogeneity. Among specific antibiotics, cefotaxime resistance was 96.1% (220 isolates), meropenem resistance was 92.4% (353 isolates), and gentamicin resistance was 77.7% (356 isolates). Additionally, sulfamethoxazole resistance was 46.1% (176 out of 360 isolates, 95% CI: 23.5%-70.4%), displaying significant heterogeneity.
This study highlights the widespread antibiotic resistance in Elizabethkingia, underscoring the urgent need for targeted treatment strategies and enhanced surveillance programs. The findings emphasize the importance of monitoring local resistance patterns to guide clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on elucidating resistance mechanisms and genetic diversity to develop practical therapeutic approaches and mitigate the global health impact of Elizabethkingia infections.
抗生素耐药性伊丽莎白菌属菌株的出现给临床环境带来了重大挑战。本系统评价和荟萃分析全面评估了全球不同地区伊丽莎白菌属分离株中抗生素耐药性的流行情况。
使用预定义的检索策略,于1998年至2024年1月9日在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。纳入报告伊丽莎白菌属抗生素耐药性的合格研究。应用随机效应模型估计耐药比例并评估异质性。进行了额外的分析,包括元回归、亚组评估以及异常值和有影响力研究的评估,以探讨耐药趋势并评估发表偏倚。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所清单评估研究质量,所有统计分析均使用R语言和metafor软件包进行。
共识别出1016篇文章,其中34项研究(47份报告)符合纳入标准。汇总分析表明,对头孢他啶的耐药率较高(88.5%的分离株,95%置信区间:21.1%-99.5%),且无显著异质性。对利福平的耐药率为12.5%(95%置信区间:5.9%-24.7%),显示出较大的异质性,而对环丙沙星的耐药率为27.9%(95%置信区间:13.8%-48.4%),异质性相当大。在特定抗生素中,头孢噻肟耐药率为96.1%(220株分离株),美罗培南耐药率为92.4%(353株分离株),庆大霉素耐药率为77.7%(356株分离株)。此外,磺胺甲恶唑耐药率为46.1%(360株分离株中的176株,95%置信区间:23.5%-70.4%),显示出显著异质性。
本研究突出了伊丽莎白菌属中广泛存在的抗生素耐药性,强调了制定针对性治疗策略和加强监测计划的迫切需求。研究结果强调了监测局部耐药模式以指导临床决策的重要性。未来的研究应集中于阐明耐药机制和遗传多样性,以开发切实可行的治疗方法并减轻伊丽莎白菌属感染对全球健康的影响。