Mhazo Alison T, Maponga Charles C, Abimbola Seye
Ministry of Health, Community Health Sciences Unit, Private Bag 65, Area 3, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, P.O. Box A178, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):765-779. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf033.
The presence, absence, or effectiveness of policy entrepreneurs is often invoked as an explanation for the state of health policy making, especially in the global South. However, much remains under-analyzed about their structure and function. This qualitative study aims to understand how policy entrepreneurs influence policy change in the global South. We complemented a review of the literature (26 papers) with key informant interviews of seven policy entrepreneurs from Zimbabwe. We used an adapted framework with four elements of policy entrepreneurship to frame the analysis: displaying social acuity, defining problems, building teams, and leading by example. Our analysis showed that policy entrepreneurship exists amongst high-level elites and low-level actors. Local policy entrepreneurs tend to exhibit high levels of social acuity to define context-relevant problems and devise holistic solutions. They define situations as problems through comparison with desirable states of affairs, emphasizing the failure of current policies and interpreting data as crises. They achieve team building by constantly re-framing problems to expand policy portrayals and increase the number of people mobilized around the problem. Displaying social acuity stands out as highly consequential for policy entrepreneurship, as it helps in defining problems in a way that resonates with other actors and in mobilizing teams to take collective action. Local policy entrepreneurs lead by example as they implement and demonstrate the workability of their solutions, ultimately proving to be key actors in tackling pervasive and oft-marginalized health problems. That underscores the need to value local ideas as opposed to preference for those that are influenced by global movements. Systematic programmes-such as establishing policy institutes in the global South-should be set up to drive such processes and to, more broadly, support local policy entrepreneurship, including through the formal training of actors in policy sciences.
政策企业家的存在、缺失或效力常常被用来解释卫生政策制定的状况,尤其是在全球南方地区。然而,关于他们的结构和功能仍有许多未被充分分析之处。这项定性研究旨在了解政策企业家如何在全球南方地区影响政策变革。我们通过对26篇文献的综述,并对来自津巴布韦的7位政策企业家进行关键信息人访谈来进行补充。我们使用了一个经过调整的框架,该框架包含政策企业家精神的四个要素来构建分析:展现社会敏锐度、界定问题、组建团队和以身作则。我们的分析表明,政策企业家精神存在于高层精英和底层行动者之中。当地的政策企业家往往表现出很高的社会敏锐度,以界定与背景相关的问题并设计整体解决方案。他们通过与理想状况进行比较,将情况定义为问题,强调当前政策的失败并将数据解读为危机。他们通过不断重新构建问题来扩大政策描述范围,并增加围绕该问题动员起来的人数,从而实现团队建设。展现社会敏锐度在政策企业家精神中显得尤为重要,因为它有助于以与其他行动者产生共鸣的方式界定问题,并动员团队采取集体行动。当地政策企业家在实施和展示其解决方案的可行性时以身作则,最终证明是解决普遍存在且常被边缘化的卫生问题的关键行动者。这凸显了重视本土理念而非偏好受全球运动影响的理念的必要性。应该设立系统性项目,比如在全球南方地区建立政策研究所,以推动此类进程,并更广泛地支持当地的政策企业家精神,包括通过对政策科学领域的行动者进行正规培训。