Malhotra Akash, Elísio Délio, Machiana Antonio, Lwilla Anange, Hella Jerry, Young Neenah, Khosa Celso, Cossa Marta, Nguenha Dinis, Mgaya Regino, Balate Dionisia, Watson Mikaela, Leukes Vinzeigh, Fekadu Lelisa, Bashir Saima, Penn-Nicholson Adam, Ruhwald Morten, Larsson Leyla, Sharma Monisha, Kranzer Katharina, Denkinger Claudia M, Dowdy David
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, United States of America.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 30;5(5):e0004724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004724. eCollection 2025.
In low-and middle-income countries, missed or delayed tuberculosis (TB) diagnoses contribute to avoidable morbidity, mortality, and transmission. Decentralized testing platforms, such as the Molbio Truenat, may offer solutions by providing accurate point-of-care testing, improving access, and lowering out-of-pocket costs. Despite these advantages, the overall cost and cost-effectiveness of identifying additional TB cases using the Truenat MTB assays remain inadequately explored and understood. We collected economic data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of TB testing using decentralized Molbio Truenat platform with MTB Plus and MTB-RIF Dx assays (Truenat MTB assays) versus hub-and-spoke Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (standard of care) in Tanzania and Mozambique (TB-CAPT Core trial). We estimated facility-based diagnostic cost per participant tested and incremental facility-based diagnostic cost per incremental participant initiating TB treatment within seven and sixty days from enrolment. We used the societal perspective and conducted sensitivity analyses to determine key drivers of cost-effectiveness. The facility-based diagnostic cost per participant initiating treatment within seven days from enrolment in Mozambique was $853(95% uncertainty range: $707, $1072) for hub-and-spoke testing and $690($588, $823) for decentralized testing; in Tanzania costs were $596($485, $746) for hub-and-spoke testing and $592($495, $715) for decentralized testing. At sixty days, costs per treatment initiation were $581($493, $706) for hub-and-spoke vs. $678($576, $811) for decentralized testing in Mozambique, and $391($324, $476) vs. $591($494, $716) in Tanzania. Comparing decentralized to hub-and-spoke testing, the incremental cost per incremental seven-day treatment initiation was $403(-$103, $941) in Mozambique and $580($167, $1638) in Tanzania, and $805(-$10107, $10560) and -$353(-$20299, $20802) for sixty-day treatment initiation, respectively. Utilization (i.e., testing volume) of decentralized equipment was the strongest driver of cost-effectiveness. Decentralized TB testing with Truenat MTB assays is cost-effective relative to hub-and-spoke testing in Mozambique and Tanzania.
在低收入和中等收入国家,结核病(TB)诊断延误或漏诊会导致可避免的发病、死亡和传播。诸如Molbio Truenat之类的去中心化检测平台,或许能通过提供准确的即时检测、改善可及性并降低自付费用来提供解决方案。尽管有这些优势,但使用Truenat MTB检测法来识别更多结核病病例的总体成本及成本效益仍未得到充分研究和理解。我们从一项多中心随机对照试验中收集了经济数据,该试验在坦桑尼亚和莫桑比克比较了使用带有MTB Plus和MTB-RIF Dx检测法的去中心化Molbio Truenat平台(Truenat MTB检测法)与中心辐射式Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra(护理标准)进行结核病检测的情况(TB-CAPT核心试验)。我们估算了每位接受检测参与者的基于机构的诊断成本,以及从入组起7天和60天内每增加一名开始结核病治疗的参与者所增加的基于机构的诊断成本。我们采用社会视角并进行了敏感性分析,以确定成本效益的关键驱动因素。在莫桑比克,从入组起7天内开始治疗的每位参与者的基于机构的诊断成本,中心辐射式检测为853美元(95%不确定区间:707美元,1072美元),去中心化检测为690美元(588美元,823美元);在坦桑尼亚,中心辐射式检测成本为596美元(485美元,746美元),去中心化检测成本为592美元(495美元,715美元)。在60天时,莫桑比克每例开始治疗的成本,中心辐射式检测为581美元(493美元,706美元),去中心化检测为678美元(576美元,811美元);在坦桑尼亚,分别为391美元(324美元,476美元)和591美元(494美元,716美元)。将去中心化检测与中心辐射式检测相比较,在莫桑比克,每增加一例7天开始治疗的增量成本为403美元(-103美元,941美元),在坦桑尼亚为580美元(167美元,1638美元);对于60天开始治疗的情况,增量成本分别为805美元(-10107美元,10560美元)和-353美元(-20299美元,20802美元)。去中心化设备的利用率(即检测量)是成本效益的最强驱动因素。在莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚,使用Truenat MTB检测法进行去中心化结核病检测相对于中心辐射式检测具有成本效益。