Kumar Karthick, Choudhary Hansraj, Ahmad Haseen, Muthu Valliappan, Gupta Parikshaa, Rudramurthy Shivaprakash M, Agnihotri Sourav, Agarwal Ritesh, Chakrabarti Arunaloke, Kaur Harsimran
Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh India.
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Oct;113(2):116924. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116924. Epub 2025 May 22.
The currently available diagnostic tests lack sensitivity to diagnose pulmonary cryptococcosis. In the current study, we developed and standardized an in-house real-time PCR assay and evaluated the antigen detection in respiratory samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.
We standardized an in-house real-time PCR assay (using URA5 and STR1 primers; index test 1) and cryptococcal antigen detection (BIOSYNEX® CryptoPS, France) from the respiratory samples (index test 2). We considered a sample positive for PCR assay when both gene targets (URA5 and STR1) were detected. We prospectively enrolled subjects undergoing evaluation for non-resolving pneumonia and evaluated the performance of the index tests for diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis. The reference standard was proven or probable pulmonary cryptococcosis diagnosed by EORTC/MSG (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Mycoses Study Group) criteria.
Of the 133 subjects enrolled in the study, two (2.66 %) and three (3.99 %) were diagnosed as having proven and probable pulmonary cryptococcosis. 3.8 % of study subjects had HIV. The sensitivity and specificity of qPCR (index test 1) for the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis were 60.0 % (95 % CI: 14.6-94.7) and 96.1 % (95 % CI: 91.1-98.7), respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of antigen detection from respiratory samples (index test 2) were 40.0 % (95 % CI: 5.2-85.3) and 99.2 % (95 % CI: 95.7 -100.0), respectively.
In-house PCR and antigen detection in respiratory specimens can potentially be used for early diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis. Larger multicenter studies are required to confirm their utility.
目前可用的诊断测试在诊断肺隐球菌病方面缺乏敏感性。在本研究中,我们开发并标准化了一种内部实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法,并评估了呼吸道样本中的抗原检测用于肺隐球菌病的诊断。
我们标准化了一种内部实时PCR检测方法(使用URA5和STR1引物;指标测试1)以及从呼吸道样本中检测隐球菌抗原(法国BIOSYNEX® CryptoPS;指标测试2)。当两个基因靶点(URA5和STR1)均被检测到时,我们认为该样本的PCR检测呈阳性。我们前瞻性地纳入了正在接受非消散性肺炎评估的受试者,并评估了这些指标测试在诊断肺隐球菌病方面的性能。参考标准是根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/真菌病研究组(EORTC/MSG)标准诊断的确诊或疑似肺隐球菌病。
在纳入研究的133名受试者中,两名(2.66%)和三名(3.99%)被诊断为确诊和疑似肺隐球菌病。3.8%的研究受试者感染了人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。用于诊断肺隐球菌病的定量PCR(指标测试1)的敏感性和特异性分别为60.0%(95%置信区间:14.6 - 94.7)和96.1%(95%置信区间:91.1 - 98.7),而呼吸道样本抗原检测(指标测试2)的敏感性和特异性分别为40.0%(95%置信区间:5.2 - 85.3)和99.2%(95%置信区间:95.7 - 100.0)。
呼吸道标本的内部PCR和抗原检测可能可用于肺隐球菌病的早期诊断。需要更大规模的多中心研究来证实它们的效用。