El-Jardali Fadi, Ataya Nour, Edelman Alexandra, Zaidi Shehla, Marten Robert, Salah Hassan, Azab Hagar, Khalid Faraz, Mataria Awad, Rasanathan Kumanan
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 30;10(Suppl 2):e017700. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017700.
Primary healthcare (PHC) can play a critical role in disease preparedness and response. The PHC approach was not always considered in the COVID-19 response in the eastern Mediterranean region (EMR). This article assesses the extent to which a PHC approach was deployed in the pandemic response and identifies barriers, enablers and lessons learnt for strengthening PHC for disease preparedness and response in EMR.
A multicountry synthesis of 17 case studies from EMR was conducted, using an analytical framework building on the three components of PHC framed by the 2018 Astana Declaration and adapted to enable the analysis of pandemic responses, namely the following. (1) How primary care (PC) and essential public health functions were employed to respond to COVID-19? (2) How multisectoral policy and actions were involved in responding to COVID-19? (3) To what extent was engaging and communicating with communities to leverage community resources effective? Countries were classified into three groups based on the level of socioeconomic development, representing the EMR diversity. Deductive content analysis was conducted.
Findings revealed variations across countries in the application of a PHC approach in pandemic response, with Group 1 countries (higher socioeconomic development) swiftly scaling up PC responses, while Groups 2 and 3 countries prioritised secondary and tertiary care responses. Multisectoral coordination, digital health innovations, cross referrals and expanded disease surveillance commonly emerged as new practices in most EMR countries. Uneven regulatory capacity, inadequately equipped PC workforces and insufficient community engagement were key areas requiring further support.
Priority areas for a comprehensive action agenda for PHC-oriented disease preparedness and response in EMR would benefit from establishing comprehensive PHC-oriented models of care; better resourcing PC; activating an emergency funding pool and strengthening community engagement. Advancing this agenda would contribute to ensuring the health security goal while progressing towards universal health coverage in EMR.
初级卫生保健(PHC)在疾病防范和应对中可发挥关键作用。在东地中海区域(EMR)应对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的过程中,初级卫生保健方法并非始终得到考虑。本文评估了在大流行应对中采用初级卫生保健方法的程度,并确定了加强初级卫生保健以应对东地中海区域疾病防范和应对的障碍、推动因素和经验教训。
利用基于2018年《阿斯塔纳宣言》所界定的初级卫生保健三个组成部分并经调整以用于分析大流行应对情况的分析框架,对东地中海区域17个案例研究进行了多国综合分析,具体如下:(1)如何利用初级保健(PC)和基本公共卫生职能应对COVID-19?(2)多部门政策和行动在应对COVID-19中如何发挥作用?(3)与社区互动并交流以利用社区资源的成效如何?根据社会经济发展水平将各国分为三组,以体现东地中海区域的多样性。进行了演绎式内容分析。
研究结果显示,各国在大流行应对中应用初级卫生保健方法的情况存在差异,第1组国家(社会经济发展水平较高)迅速扩大了初级保健应对措施,而第2组和第3组国家则优先考虑二级和三级保健应对措施。多部门协调、数字卫生创新、交叉转诊和扩大疾病监测在大多数东地中海区域国家通常成为新的做法。监管能力参差不齐、初级保健工作人员配备不足以及社区参与不够是需要进一步支持的关键领域。
东地中海区域以初级卫生保健为导向的疾病防范和应对综合行动议程的优先领域将受益于建立全面的以初级卫生保健为导向的护理模式;为初级保健提供更多资源;设立应急资金池并加强社区参与。推进这一议程将有助于确保卫生安全目标,同时推动东地中海区域实现全民健康覆盖。