• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年护理中药物安全干预措施的卫生经济评估:在多中心准实验研究设计中识别因果效应

Health economic evaluation of a medication safety intervention in elderly care: identifying causal effects in a multi-center quasi-experimental study design.

作者信息

Langenberger Benedikt, Siegel Martin, Busse Reinhard, Vogt Verena

机构信息

Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 30;25(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12898-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12898-0
PMID:40448133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124031/
Abstract

The high prevalence of multimorbidity in the aging population necessitates complex medication regimens, increasing the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) and hospital admissions. This paper evaluates an intervention aimed at improving medication safety for northeastern and western Germany under real-world conditions, thereby providing a pragmatic approach to the challenges of multi-center studies with staggered intervention starts and voluntary participation. The analysis utilizes iterative Propensity Score Matching (PSM) followed by a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator to navigate the methodological complexities and assess the intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Results reveal a significant reduction in ADE-related hospital admissions by 27.5% and overall hospital admissions by 17.5%. We find that the intervention is cost-effective at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €15,169.66 per averted ADE and €4,180.61 per averted hospital admission. This study illustrates for evaluating complex health interventions in real-world settings and underscores the importance of balancing health outcomes improvements with economic considerations in aging populations.

摘要

老年人群中多重疾病的高患病率使得药物治疗方案变得复杂,增加了药物不良事件(ADEs)和住院的风险。本文评估了一项旨在在现实世界条件下提高德国东北部和西部用药安全性的干预措施,从而为多中心研究中交错启动干预和自愿参与所带来的挑战提供一种务实的方法。该分析采用迭代倾向得分匹配(PSM),随后使用差分法(DiD)估计量来应对方法上的复杂性,并评估干预措施的有效性和成本效益。结果显示,与ADE相关的住院人数显著减少了27.5%,总体住院人数减少了17.5%。我们发现,该干预措施具有成本效益,每避免一次ADE的增量成本效益比(ICER)为15,169.66欧元,每避免一次住院的ICER为4,180.61欧元。这项研究说明了在现实世界环境中评估复杂健康干预措施的情况,并强调了在老年人群中平衡健康结果改善与经济考虑因素的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/e11d053978fc/12913_2025_12898_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/00298e8fea66/12913_2025_12898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/622dce012e45/12913_2025_12898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/e11d053978fc/12913_2025_12898_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/00298e8fea66/12913_2025_12898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/622dce012e45/12913_2025_12898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/12124031/e11d053978fc/12913_2025_12898_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health economic evaluation of a medication safety intervention in elderly care: identifying causal effects in a multi-center quasi-experimental study design.老年护理中药物安全干预措施的卫生经济评估:在多中心准实验研究设计中识别因果效应
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 30;25(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12898-0.
2
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
3
Digital Health Technology Interventions for Improving Medication Safety: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.用于提高用药安全性的数字健康技术干预措施:经济评估的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e65546. doi: 10.2196/65546.
4
Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施(包括针对病情加重的行动计划)与常规护理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD011682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011682.pub2.
5
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
8
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
9
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.
10
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.

本文引用的文献

1
The detection and prevention of adverse drug events in nursing home and home care patients: Study protocol of a quasi-experimental study.养老院和家庭护理患者中药物不良事件的检测和预防:一项准实验研究的研究方案。
Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1477-1485. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1146. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Drug Safety for Nursing-Home Residents-Findings of a Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trialin 44 Nursing Homes.《养老院居民的药物安全 - 一项在 44 家养老院开展的实用、集群随机、对照干预试验的研究结果》。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Oct 22;118(42):705-712. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0297.
3
Comparison of the First and Second Waves of Hospitalized Patients With SARS-CoV-2.
新型冠状病毒肺炎住院患者第一波与第二波的比较。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 May 7;118(18):326-327. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0215.
4
How we should respond to the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: A German perspective.我们应如何应对新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2疫情:德国视角。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2020;74(4):363-372. doi: 10.3233/CH-209004.
5
Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching.倾向得分匹配后的平衡诊断
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):16. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.12.10.
6
Difference-in-differences analysis and the propensity score to estimate the impact of non-randomized primary care interventions.采用差异中的差异分析和倾向得分法来估计非随机初级保健干预措施的影响。
Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):247-251. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz003.
7
Successfully Reducing Hospitalizations of Nursing Home Residents: Results of the Missouri Quality Initiative.成功减少养老院居民住院率:密苏里州质量倡议的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):960-966. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Correlation of Incident Potentially Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions and Hospitalization: An Analysis Based on the PRISCUS List.新发潜在不适当用药处方与住院治疗的相关性:基于PRISCUS清单的分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Sep;2(3):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0035-4.
9
Polypharmacy and Renal Failure in Nursing Home Residents: Results of the Inappropriate Medication in Patients with Renal Insufficiency in Nursing Homes (IMREN) Study.疗养院居民的多重用药与肾衰竭:疗养院肾功能不全患者不适当用药(IMREN)研究结果
Drugs Aging. 2016 Jan;33(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0333-2.
10
Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change.在双重差分模型中使用倾向得分来估计政策变化的影响。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 1;14(4):166-182. doi: 10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z.