Difference-in-differences analysis and the propensity score to estimate the impact of non-randomized primary care interventions.
作者信息
Godard-Sebillotte Claire, Karunananthan Sathya, Vedel Isabelle
机构信息
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
出版信息
Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):247-251. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz003.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Difference-in-differences analysis and the propensity score to estimate the impact of non-randomized primary care interventions.采用差异中的差异分析和倾向得分法来估计非随机初级保健干预措施的影响。
Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):247-251. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz003.
2
An evaluation of bias in propensity score-adjusted non-linear regression models.倾向得分调整后的非线性回归模型中的偏倚评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):846-862. doi: 10.1177/0962280216643739. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.在初级保健中使用倾向评分比较随机对照试验和观察性研究中的治疗效果。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Sep;67(662):e643-e649. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692153. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.对关于“使用倾向得分和观察性数据来估计随机对照试验的可推广性偏差”评论的回应。
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):538-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.6032.
5
Comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias' by Taylor R. Pressler and Eloise E. Kaizar, Statistics in Medicine 2013.对泰勒·R·普雷斯勒和埃洛伊斯·E·凯扎尔所著《利用倾向得分和观察性数据估计随机对照试验的可推广性偏差》的评论，发表于《医学统计学》2013年。
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):536-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.5929.
6
High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.高维倾向评分算法在具有时变干预措施的比较效果研究中的应用
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):753-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.6377. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation.多次插补后两种倾向得分估计方法的比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Feb;25(1):188-204. doi: 10.1177/0962280212445945. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
8
Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.倾向得分法在治疗组与非随机对照组比较中减少偏倚的应用
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b.
9
Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.双重稳健估计在倾向评分匹配分析中校正偏差的能力比较。一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1513-1519. doi: 10.1002/pds.4325. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.利用倾向评分匹配设计检验观察性生存数据中的因果效应。
Stat Med. 2018 May 20;37(11):1846-1858. doi: 10.1002/sim.7599. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Health economic evaluation of a medication safety intervention in elderly care: identifying causal effects in a multi-center quasi-experimental study design.老年护理中药物安全干预措施的卫生经济评估：在多中心准实验研究设计中识别因果效应
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 30;25(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12898-0.
2
The impacts on population health by China's regional health data centers and the potential mechanism of influence.中国区域卫生数据中心对人群健康的影响及潜在影响机制。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 17;11:20552076251314102. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314102. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Effects of Medicare Part D medication therapy management on racial/ethnic disparities in adherence to antidementia medications among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: An observational study.医疗保险D部分药物治疗管理对阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者抗痴呆药物依从性种族/民族差异的影响：一项观察性研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Feb 10;13:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100420. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Effects of basic medical insurance integration on subjective wellbeing of residents in China: empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment.基本医疗保险整合对中国居民主观幸福感的影响：来自准实验的经验证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;11:1211350. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1211350. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响：肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.
6
The impact of increasing expenditure on National Essential Public Health Services on the medical costs of hypertension in China: A difference-in-difference analysis.增加国家基本公共卫生服务支出对中国高血压医疗费用的影响：一项双重差分分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0278026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278026. eCollection 2022.
7
Determinant factors behind changes in health-seeking behaviour before and after implementation of universal health coverage in Indonesia.印度尼西亚全民医保实施前后卫生服务利用行为变化的决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 12;22(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13142-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Daring to draw causal claims from non-randomized studies of primary care interventions.敢于从初级保健干预措施的非随机研究中得出因果关系结论。
Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):639-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy005.
2
The impact of team-based primary care on health care services utilization and costs: Quebec's family medicine groups.团队式初级保健对医疗服务利用和成本的影响：魁北克的家庭医学组。
J Health Econ. 2017 Sep;55:76-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
3
Does enrollment in multidisciplinary team-based primary care practice improve adherence to guideline-recommended processes of care? Quebec's Family Medicine Groups, 2002-2010.参与多学科团队主导的初级医疗实践是否能提高对指南推荐的医疗流程的依从性？魁北克家庭医学团体，2002 - 2010年。
Health Policy. 2017 Apr;121(4):378-388. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.自然实验：方法、途径及其对公共卫生干预研究贡献的概述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:39-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
The Propensity Score.倾向评分
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1637-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480.
6
Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change.在双重差分模型中使用倾向得分来估计政策变化的影响。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 1;14(4):166-182. doi: 10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z.
7
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.评估医疗保健政策变化的方法：双重差分法
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.
8
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis.定量偏倚分析的良好实践。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1969-85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu149. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Characteristics of physicians and patients who join team-based primary care practices: evidence from Quebec's Family Medicine Groups.加入团队式初级医疗服务机构的医生和患者的特征：来自魁北克家庭医学团体的证据。
Health Policy. 2014 Jun;116(2-3):264-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies.队列研究中的一对一倾向评分匹配。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2:69-80. doi: 10.1002/pds.3263.
Zotero 插件