Békés Vera, Bőthe Beata, Aafjes-van Doorn Katie
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70085. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70085.
Digital health technologies are being increasingly integrated into mental healthcare. This means that patients have different treatment options, and clinicians need to consider different ways of supporting their patients too. The adoption of Digital Mental Health Intervention (DMHI) technologies will be influenced by patients' and clinicians' attitudes towards these technologies. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is the most commonly used model to examine acceptance of technologies in professional settings, which identifies determinants of behavioural intention to use technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI). We aimed to develop and validate the UTAUT-AI-DMHI measure to assess acceptance various types of digital and AI-based mental health interventions. We assessed the UTAUT-AI-DMHI's psychometric properties in three interventions: teletherapy via videoconferencing, AI chatbot and AI virtual therapist interventions in two samples. Sample 1 included n = 528 patients, n = 155 clinicians and n = 432 participants belonging to both groups; Sample 2 was used to corroborate the results and included a representative US community sample of n = 536. Our results demonstrated adequate construct validity and reliability of the UTAUT factors. In line with previous UTAUT literature, confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the final 17-item (plus one item assessing Behavioural Intention) scale consisted of seven factors: ease of use, social influence, convenience, human connection, perceived privacy risk, hedonic motivation and therapy quality expectations. All factors were positively associated with general attitudes towards AI and intention to use the intervention in the future in each of the three DMHI formats. This implies that the UTAUT-AI-DMHI self-report scale can be applied to assess acceptance of various kinds of digital and AI-based mental health interventions. Further, the UTAUT-AI-DMHI can be administered as a self-report scale for patients, clinicians and the general public and thus allows for a direct comparison of acceptance of different intervention formats.
数字健康技术正越来越多地融入精神卫生保健领域。这意味着患者有了不同的治疗选择,临床医生也需要考虑以不同方式为患者提供支持。数字心理健康干预(DMHI)技术的采用将受到患者和临床医生对这些技术态度的影响。技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)是专业环境中检验技术接受度最常用的模型,它确定了使用技术(如人工智能(AI))的行为意向的决定因素。我们旨在开发并验证UTAUT-AI-DMHI测量工具,以评估对各类基于数字和人工智能的心理健康干预措施的接受度。我们在三种干预措施中评估了UTAUT-AI-DMHI的心理测量特性:通过视频会议进行的远程治疗、人工智能聊天机器人以及在两个样本中的人工智能虚拟治疗师干预。样本1包括528名患者、155名临床医生以及432名同时属于两组的参与者;样本2用于证实结果,包括一个n = 536的具有代表性的美国社区样本。我们的结果证明了UTAUT各因素具有足够的结构效度和信度。与之前的UTAUT文献一致,验证性因素分析表明,最终的17项量表(加一项评估行为意向的项目)由七个因素组成:易用性、社会影响、便利性、人际联系、感知隐私风险、享乐动机和治疗质量期望。在三种DMHI形式中,所有因素都与对人工智能的总体态度以及未来使用该干预措施的意向呈正相关。这意味着UTAUT-AI-DMHI自我报告量表可用于评估对各类基于数字和人工智能的心理健康干预措施的接受度。此外,UTAUT-AI-DMHI可以作为患者、临床医生和公众的自我报告量表进行施测,从而能够直接比较对不同干预形式的接受度。