Wood W D, Swanson D A
J Clin Psychol. 1985 Sep;41(5):723-8.
Applying the principle of least restrictive alternative in civil commitment seldom results in outpatient treatment, even after initial treatment in a more restrictive setting. We studied 18 committed persons who were receiving outpatient treatment and compared them with three patient groups that differed by admission status and treatment setting. We offered explanations as to why outpatient treatment seldom proved to be the final step toward release from commitment.
在民事收容中应用限制最少替代方案的原则很少会导致门诊治疗，即使是在更具限制性的环境中进行初始治疗之后。我们研究了18名正在接受门诊治疗的被收容者，并将他们与另外三组因入院状态和治疗环境不同的患者进行了比较。我们对为什么门诊治疗很少被证明是从收容中获释的最后一步给出了解释。
