Suppr超能文献

感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的献血者血液中HIV酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)结果假阳性增加的分析

Analysis of Increased False-Positive ELISA Results for HIV in the Blood of Donors Infected with SARS-CoV-2.

作者信息

Lin H, Wang Z, Ren Q, Cai Z, Ge F, Yuan W, Liao T, Wu Y, Peng R, Gu Y, Kuang Y

机构信息

Zhongshan Central Blood Station, Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Bull Exp Biol Med. 2025 Apr;178(6):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s10517-025-06411-0. Epub 2025 May 31.

Abstract

The study examined the effect of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the blood of donors after COVID-19 on objectivity of HIV detection in the blood samples with two ELISA variants employing reagents A or B in order to select reliable kits to minimize the false-positive HIV results. Retrospectively, the quality control data of two ELISA kits with reagents A or B developed to detect HIV were analyzed using the control sera together with the results of donor blood tested with both kits, which were collected in the periods from January to December 2022 (n = 55,528) and from January to March 2023 (n = 13,837). From the blood samples obtained in 2023, all the specimens with false-positive HIV results obtained with reagent A were selected (n = 126) together with randomly taken samples of this pool with negative HIV results (n = 345). All selected samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus, thereupon the correlation analysis was performed between the samples containing SARS-CoV-2 and those with HIV detected by ELISA reagent A. The data on reactivity of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 significantly correlated with the false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A (r = 0.451, p < 0.01). In 2023, the share of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A was 0.91% (126/13,837), which was 6.06-fold greater than the corresponding value in 2022 (0.133% (74/55,528); χ = 230.38, p < 0.01). This data echoed the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic resulting in the appearance of antibodies against the virus in the donor blood. At the same time, the number of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent B in 2022 (0.014% (8/55,521)) and in 2023 (0.036% (5/13,837)) were essentially smaller than those obtained with reagent A, and the results obtained with the test kit B did not significantly differ from each other for both time periods. Thus, IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of donors after COVID-19 can affect the results of HIV detection by some ELISA reagents and consequently elevate the number of false-positive analyses.

摘要

该研究检测了新冠康复后献血者血液中针对SARS-CoV-2病毒的IgG抗体,对采用试剂A或B的两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法检测血样中HIV的客观性的影响,以选择可靠的试剂盒,尽量减少HIV检测结果的假阳性。回顾性地分析了两种分别采用试剂A或B检测HIV的ELISA试剂盒的质量控制数据,同时分析了2022年1月至12月(n = 55,528)和2023年1月至3月(n = 13,837)期间用这两种试剂盒检测的献血者血液结果。从2023年采集 的血样中,选取所有用试剂A检测出HIV假阳性结果的样本(n = 126)以及从该样本库中随机抽取的HIV检测结果为阴性的样本(n = 345)。对所有选取的样本检测针对SARS-CoV-2病毒的IgG抗体,随后对含有SARS-CoV-2的样本和用ELISA试剂A检测出HIV的样本进行相关性分析。针对SARS-CoV-2的IgG抗体反应性数据与用试剂A检测出HIV的ELISA假阳性结果显著相关(r = 0.451,p < 0.01)。2023年,用试剂A检测出HIV的ELISA假阳性结果比例为0.91%(126/13,837),这比2022年的相应比例(0.133%(74/55,528))高6.06倍(χ = 230.38,p < 0.01)。该数据反映了SARS-CoV-2疫情导致献血者血液中出现了针对该病毒的抗体。同时,2022年(0.014%(8/55,521))和2023年(0.036%(5/13,837))用试剂B检测出HIV的ELISA假阳性结果数量明显少于用试剂A检测出的结果,并且在两个时间段内,试剂盒B的检测结果之间没有显著差异。因此,新冠康复后献血者血液中针对SARS-CoV-2的IgG抗体可能会影响某些ELISA试剂检测HIV的结果,从而增加假阳性分析的数量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验