Lüdemann Jonas, Pels Fabian, Boss Martin, Kleinert Jens
Institute of Psychology, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Sep;80:102901. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102901. Epub 2025 May 30.
Interpersonal goal conflict occurs when at least one team member has a goal that interferes with the achievement of other team members' goals. Such interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on a variety of team outcomes (e.g., team performance, well-being) and may theoretically lead to general team conflict, although the latter has not yet been empirically investigated. Hence, the primary aim of this study is to examine whether interpersonal goal conflict has an impact on general team conflict. In addition, a secondary aim is to examine whether intrapersonal tension may be a mediator of this relationship. Increased intrapersonal tension (including negative emotions) may be a necessary condition for interpersonal goal conflict to lead to general team conflict. A between-subject experiment with three conditions was conducted. In all conditions, participants (N = 80 male sports science students; M = 22.64 years, SD = 2.72) performed in a team of three (including a confederate). The team goal was to perform an interactive task on a bicycle ergometer. Interpersonal goal conflicts were induced by threatening the achievement of the team goal through additive deviant individual goal-behavior constellations in the experimental conditions. Perceived intrapersonal tension (mediator) and perceived general team conflict (dependent variable) were measured after the task. An ANOVA showed that general team conflict was higher in the experimental condition with an additional deviant behavior (DB) than in the control condition (CC) and the experimental condition with an additional deviant goal without deviant behavior (DG); there were no significant differences between CC and DG. A mediation analysis showed that the relationship between goal incompatibility and general team conflict, partly mediated via intrapersonal tension, was stronger in DB than in DG. The experiment with young adult males provides evidence that interpersonal goal conflict behavior (and not just the existence of a deviant goal) leads to general team conflict, which is partly explained by intrapersonal tension among team members.
当至少一名团队成员的目标干扰其他团队成员目标的实现时,就会发生人际目标冲突。这种人际目标冲突会对各种团队结果(如团队绩效、幸福感)产生影响,并且理论上可能导致团队总体冲突,尽管后者尚未得到实证研究。因此,本研究的主要目的是检验人际目标冲突是否会对团队总体冲突产生影响。此外,次要目的是检验人际紧张是否可能是这种关系的中介变量。人际紧张加剧(包括负面情绪)可能是人际目标冲突导致团队总体冲突的必要条件。我们进行了一项有三种条件的组间实验。在所有条件下,参与者(N = 80名男性体育科学专业学生;M = 22.64岁,SD = 2.72)三人一组(包括一名同谋)进行活动。团队目标是在自行车测力计上完成一项互动任务。在实验条件下,通过附加偏离个体目标行为组合来威胁团队目标的实现,从而引发人际目标冲突。任务完成后测量感知到的人际紧张(中介变量)和感知到的团队总体冲突(因变量)。方差分析表明,与控制条件(CC)和有附加偏离目标但无偏离行为的实验条件(DG)相比,有附加偏离行为(DB)的实验条件下团队总体冲突更高;CC和DG之间没有显著差异。中介分析表明,目标不相容与团队总体冲突之间的关系,部分通过人际紧张介导,在DB条件下比在DG条件下更强。这项针对年轻成年男性的实验提供了证据,证明人际目标冲突行为(而不仅仅是存在偏离目标)会导致团队总体冲突,团队成员之间的人际紧张在一定程度上解释了这一现象。