• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“机器人”如雨下:网络调查获取途径的便捷化如何引发了一场完美风暴。

It's raining bots: how easier access to internet surveys has created the perfect storm.

作者信息

Caven Isabelle, Yang Zhenxiao, Okrainec Karen

机构信息

University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003208. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003208.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003208
PMID:40451296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12142081/
Abstract

Online surveys are an increasingly common way to collect data from the public, with social media and financial incentives (e.g. gift cards) commonly used to increase participation rates. Anonymity, ease of response, and the potential to reach diverse demographics have also contributed to the popularity of online surveys. Health services research benefits from the increased accessibility that online survey-based data collection provides; however, fraudulent responses are of concern. The following article describes our team's experience with a national survey of Canadian healthcare providers being overrun with fraudulent responses and approach to ensure the validity of our survey data. We provide recommendations for research teams on how best to design their surveys, work with their institutions to implement safeguards within survey platforms, and screen completed responses. We also describe fraudulent open-text responses that we believe to have been produced with the help of artificial intelligence and are sounding the alarm for other researchers to be aware of this potential threat to data integrity. Informed by the learnings shared, researchers and research institutions can be better equipped to prevent and screen fraudulent responses to continue successfully engage the public in online research.

摘要

在线调查是一种越来越常见的从公众那里收集数据的方式,社交媒体和经济激励措施(如礼品卡)常被用来提高参与率。匿名性、易于回复以及能够接触到不同人口群体的可能性也促使在线调查受到欢迎。基于在线调查的数据收集所带来的更高可及性使卫生服务研究受益;然而,虚假回复令人担忧。以下文章描述了我们团队在一项针对加拿大医疗服务提供者的全国性调查中遭遇大量虚假回复的经历,以及确保我们调查数据有效性的方法。我们为研究团队提供建议,说明如何最好地设计他们的调查、与所在机构合作在调查平台内实施保障措施以及筛选已完成的回复。我们还描述了我们认为是在人工智能帮助下生成的虚假开放式文本回复,并向其他研究人员敲响警钟,让他们意识到这种对数据完整性的潜在威胁。基于所分享的经验教训,研究人员和研究机构能够更好地做好准备,预防和筛选虚假回复,从而继续成功地让公众参与在线研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/12142081/82a517dd4330/bmjoq-14-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/12142081/47f92760a3d2/bmjoq-14-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/12142081/82a517dd4330/bmjoq-14-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/12142081/47f92760a3d2/bmjoq-14-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c77/12142081/82a517dd4330/bmjoq-14-2-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
It's raining bots: how easier access to internet surveys has created the perfect storm.“机器人”如雨下:网络调查获取途径的便捷化如何引发了一场完美风暴。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003208. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003208.
2
From Doubt to Confidence-Overcoming Fraudulent Submissions by Bots and Other Takers of a Web-Based Survey.从怀疑到信任——克服机器人及其他基于网络调查作弊者的欺诈性提交行为
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e60184. doi: 10.2196/60184.
3
Combating Fraudulent Participation in Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Virtual Health Research: Protocol for Increasing Data Integrity in Online Research (PRIOR).打击美国城市印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民虚拟健康研究中的欺诈性参与:提高在线研究数据完整性的方案(PRIOR)。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 13;13:e52281. doi: 10.2196/52281.
4
Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire.社交媒体招募研究参与者后对数据质量的机器人和其他不良行为者的威胁:横断面问卷调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 7;22(10):e23021. doi: 10.2196/23021.
5
Identifying Fraudulent Responses in a Study Exploring Delivery Options for Pregnancies Impacted by Gestational Diabetes: Lessons Learned From a Web-Based Survey.在一项探索妊娠期糖尿病影响的妊娠分娩选择的研究中识别欺诈性回复:基于网络调查的经验教训
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e58450. doi: 10.2196/58450.
6
Data Verification and Respondent Validity for a Web-Based Sexual Health Survey: Tutorial.基于网络的性健康调查的数据验证与应答者有效性:教程
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 9;8:e56788. doi: 10.2196/56788.
7
Evaluating the Problem of Fraudulent Participants in Health Care Research: Multimethod Pilot Study.评估医疗保健研究中欺诈性参与者的问题:多方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 4;8:e51530. doi: 10.2196/51530.
8
Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.识别和预防在线公共卫生调查中的欺诈性回复:新冠疫情期间的经验教训。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;3(8):e0001452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001452. eCollection 2023.
9
Improving data credibility in online recruitment: Signs and strategies for detecting fraudulent participants when using ResearchMatch.提高在线招募中的数据可信度:使用ResearchMatch时检测欺诈性参与者的迹象与策略
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jul;154:107925. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107925. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
10
Lessons learned from the MOMENT study on how to recruit and retain a target population online, across borders, and with automated remote data collection.从MOMENT研究中汲取的经验教训,内容涉及如何在网上、跨境以及通过自动化远程数据收集来招募和留住目标人群。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0307440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307440. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
AI-powered fraud and the erosion of online survey integrity: an analysis of 31 fraud detection strategies.人工智能驱动的欺诈与在线调查诚信的侵蚀:对31种欺诈检测策略的分析
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Dec 2;9:1432774. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1432774. eCollection 2024.
2
From Doubt to Confidence-Overcoming Fraudulent Submissions by Bots and Other Takers of a Web-Based Survey.从怀疑到信任——克服机器人及其他基于网络调查作弊者的欺诈性提交行为
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e60184. doi: 10.2196/60184.
3
ProCAPTCHA: A profile-based CAPTCHA for personal password authentication.
ProCAPTCHA:一种用于个人密码认证的基于配置文件的验证码。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0311197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311197. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing and Improving Data Integrity in Web-Based Surveys: Comparison of Fraud Detection Systems in a COVID-19 Study.评估和提高基于网络的调查中的数据完整性:COVID-19研究中欺诈检测系统的比较
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 12;8:e47091. doi: 10.2196/47091.
5
Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.识别和预防在线公共卫生调查中的欺诈性回复:新冠疫情期间的经验教训。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;3(8):e0001452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001452. eCollection 2023.
6
Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey.识别与预防调查欺诈的策略:基于网络调查的数据分析
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Jul 16;7(3):e30730. doi: 10.2196/30730.
7
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Addressing Participant Validity in a Small Internet Health Survey (The Restore Study): Protocol and Recommendations for Survey Response Validation.解决小型互联网健康调查中的参与者有效性问题(恢复研究):调查回复验证的方案与建议
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 24;7(4):e96. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7655.
9
Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs.在网络研究中检测、预防和应对“欺诈者”:伦理与权衡
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring;43(1):116-33. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12200.
10
Data Quality in web-based HIV/AIDS research: Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data.基于网络的艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究中的数据质量:处理无效和可疑数据。
Field methods. 2012 Aug 1;24(3):272-291. doi: 10.1177/1525822X12443097. Epub 2012 Apr 26.