Crumm Caitlin E, DiBlasi Robert M, Barry Dwight, Burns Brian, Rutman Lori E, Chen Chih-Hui Tracy, Reeves Stephen R, Roberts Joan S, Migita Russell
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Seattle Children's.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Aug 1;41(8):599-605. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003372. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
To determine outcomes of bronchodilator delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
We performed an in vitro analysis of the VMN and a retrospective observational study of patients receiving nebulized albuterol for a respiratory indication before (April 24, 2022-August 11, 2022) and after (April 24, 2023-July 29, 2023) introduction of the VMN in the ED.
Six hundred five children ages 1 to 17 years were included (302 preintervention, 303 postintervention). The adjusted total albuterol dose per patient was less in the postintervention group (-15.8 mg; 95% CI: -17.5 mg, -14.2 mg). The adjusted time to disposition was less post-intervention (-36 min; 95% CI: -51, -20). The adjusted odds of admission to the hospital or if admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were not statistically different [admission adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.7; ICU admission if admitted aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 0.7, 4.3]. Adjusted mean change in respiratory score with first nebulizer was similar (-0.2; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.3). Within 72 hours of disposition, odds of unplanned transfer to the ICU after admission were similar (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.6), as was unplanned ED return after discharge (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.9).
VMN use in the pediatric ED was associated with a lower total albuterol dose per patient as well as a shorter time to disposition. It did not change the odds of admission, admission to the ICU, unplanned transfers to the ICU after admission, or returns to the ER within 72 hours of discharge.
确定在儿科急诊科(ED)使用振动网式雾化器(VMN)进行支气管扩张剂给药的效果。
我们对VMN进行了体外分析,并对在ED引入VMN之前(2022年4月24日至2022年8月11日)和之后(2023年4月24日至2023年7月29日)因呼吸指征接受雾化沙丁胺醇治疗的患者进行了回顾性观察研究。
纳入了605名1至17岁的儿童(干预前302名,干预后303名)。干预后组中每位患者调整后的沙丁胺醇总剂量较低(-15.8毫克;95%置信区间:-17.5毫克,-14.2毫克)。干预后处置时间缩短(-36分钟;95%置信区间:-51,-20)。住院或入住重症监护病房(ICU)的调整后几率无统计学差异[入院调整后优势比(aOR):1.1;95%置信区间:0.7,1.7;若入院则入住ICU的aOR:1.7;95%置信区间:0.7,4.3]。首次雾化器治疗后呼吸评分的调整后平均变化相似(-0.2;95%置信区间:-0.6,0.3)。在处置后72小时内,入院后非计划转入ICU的几率相似(aOR:0.4;95%置信区间:0.1,1.6),出院后非计划返回ED的几率也相似(aOR:0.7;95%置信区间:0.3,1.9)。
在儿科ED使用VMN与每位患者较低的沙丁胺醇总剂量以及较短的处置时间相关。它并未改变入院、入住ICU、入院后非计划转入ICU或出院后72小时内返回急诊室的几率。