Fenelon Andrew, Slopen Natalie, Newman Sandra J
School of Public Policy and Department of Sociology and Criminology, Penn State University, University Park.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2023 May;59(3):832-865. doi: 10.1177/10780874221098376. Epub 2022 May 10.
Project-based housing programs and tenant-based housing programs (vouchers) may have differential effects on neighborhood outcomes for residents. Theoretically, vouchers should enhance access to low-poverty neighborhoods for low-income families thereby promoting economic mobility for children, though vouchers' success may vary by race and ethnicity. Drawing on a national survey-administrative data linkage and a quasi-experimental approach, we examine the impact of project-based housing and vouchers on an index of socioeconomic neighborhood disadvantage among children. We find that living in project-based housing leads to greater exposure to neighborhood disadvantage while receiving vouchers leads to reduced exposure. Reductions in neighborhood disadvantage for children receiving vouchers are found only for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic/Latino children. For non-White families, vouchers are associated with a reduced likelihood of living in high-poverty neighborhoods and increased likelihood of living in low-poverty neighborhoods, presenting an opportunity to narrow racial and ethnic differences in children's neighborhood attainment.
基于项目的住房计划和基于租户的住房计划(代金券)可能会对居民的邻里环境产生不同影响。从理论上讲,代金券应能增加低收入家庭进入低贫困社区的机会,从而促进儿童的经济流动性,不过代金券的成效可能因种族和族裔而异。利用全国性调查与行政数据的关联以及一种准实验方法,我们研究了基于项目的住房和代金券对儿童所在社区社会经济劣势指数的影响。我们发现,居住在基于项目的住房中会导致更多地暴露于邻里劣势,而领取代金券则会减少这种暴露。仅在非西班牙裔黑人儿童和西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童中发现领取代金券的儿童所在社区劣势有所减少。对于非白人家庭而言,代金券与居住在高贫困社区的可能性降低以及居住在低贫困社区的可能性增加相关联,这为缩小儿童在邻里环境方面的种族和族裔差异提供了契机。