• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索患者偏好在肝细胞癌治疗决策中的作用:一项定性研究。

Exploring the Role of Patient Preferences in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Decisions: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Moon Andrew M, Richardson Daniel, Lupu Gabriel V, Evon Donna M, Sanoff Hanna K, Carda-Auten Jessica, Teal Randall, Waheed Myra, Basch Ethan, Mauro David M, Yanagihara Ted K, Gerber David A, Shah Neil D, Fix Oren K, Shroff Hersh, Triglianos Tammy, Sorah Jonathan D, Jia Jingquan, Somasundaram Ashwin, Wagner Lynne I, Kappelman Michael D, Schooler Matthew, Phillips Julia R, Ekuban Hiwot A, Sanderford Ariel E, Barritt A Sidney

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2025 May 29;10(1):23814683251340055. doi: 10.1177/23814683251340055. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/23814683251340055
PMID:40453415
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12123149/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment decisions are becoming increasingly complex as new treatment options emerge. Improved understanding of tradeoffs and patient preferences in treatment decisions will enhance patient-provider discussions, improve treatment development, and inform HCC treatment guidelines. We performed a qualitative study involving patients with HCC and medical providers to assess the role of patient preferences in HCC treatment choices. Patient participants included those with HCC seen within a single tertiary care center. Provider participants involved physicians and advanced practice providers who cared for patients with HCC from a single center. Baseline and posttreatment patient interviews were conducted by trained qualitative research experts, informed by semi-structured interview guides, and analyzed using thematic analysis with pilot-tested codebooks. Summaries included a narrative description of the themes and subthemes that emerged related to each code, and illustrative quotes were used to highlight each theme. The baseline interview involved 30 patients with HCC (22 of whom participated in follow-up interviews) and 10 providers who cared for patients with HCC. Patients identified factors considered when making treatment decisions included provider confidence and experience, patient prior cancer experiences, other health issues, and faith. Providers primarily discussed the role of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, liver function, performance status, and eligibility of liver transplantation in making treatment recommendations. There was general agreement among providers that there is a need to better understand the role of patient values to improve care for HCC. Qualitative interviews were limited to patients and providers from a single center. This qualitative study provided information on the variety of values considered by both patients and providers in HCC treatment decisions and the importance of considering tradeoffs of efficacy, toxicity, and inconvenience/costs.

HIGHLIGHTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment decisions are often complex and may become increasingly so as new treatment options emerge.Improved understanding of tradeoffs and patient preferences in treatment decisions will enhance patient-provider discussions, facilitate patient-centered trials to develop new treatments, and inform HCC treatment guidelines.This qualitative study of patients and providers provided information on the values considered in HCC treatment decisions and the importance of considering the tradeoffs of efficacy, toxicity, and inconvenience/costs.These insights can be used to develop preference elicitation tools, perform large-scale preference elicitation surveys, and systematically assess and incorporate patient preferences into treatment decisions.

摘要

未标注

随着新的治疗选择不断涌现,肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗决策变得日益复杂。更好地理解治疗决策中的权衡和患者偏好,将加强医患之间的讨论,改善治疗方案的制定,并为HCC治疗指南提供参考。我们开展了一项定性研究,涉及HCC患者和医疗服务提供者,以评估患者偏好在HCC治疗选择中的作用。患者参与者包括在一家三级医疗中心就诊的HCC患者。医疗服务提供者参与者包括来自同一中心、负责治疗HCC患者的医生和高级执业提供者。由经过培训的定性研究专家依据半结构化访谈指南对患者进行基线访谈和治疗后访谈,并使用经过预测试的编码手册进行主题分析。总结内容包括对与每个编码相关出现的主题和子主题的叙述性描述,并使用示例引语来突出每个主题。基线访谈涉及30例HCC患者(其中22例参与了随访访谈)以及10名负责治疗HCC患者的医疗服务提供者。患者确定的治疗决策考虑因素包括医疗服务提供者的信心和经验、患者既往癌症经历、其他健康问题以及信仰。医疗服务提供者主要讨论了巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期、肝功能、体能状态以及肝移植资格在提出治疗建议中的作用。医疗服务提供者普遍认为有必要更好地理解患者价值观的作用,以改善HCC的治疗。定性访谈仅限于来自单一中心的患者和医疗服务提供者。这项定性研究提供了有关患者和医疗服务提供者在HCC治疗决策中所考虑的各种价值观,以及考虑疗效、毒性和不便/成本权衡的重要性的信息。

要点

肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗决策通常很复杂,随着新的治疗选择出现,可能会变得愈发复杂。更好地理解治疗决策中的权衡和患者偏好,将加强医患之间的讨论,推动以患者为中心的试验以开发新的治疗方法,并为HCC治疗指南提供参考。这项针对患者和医疗服务提供者的定性研究提供了有关HCC治疗决策中所考虑的价值观,以及考虑疗效、毒性和不便/成本权衡的重要性的信息。这些见解可用于开发偏好诱导工具、开展大规模偏好诱导调查,并系统地评估患者偏好并将其纳入治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ead/12123149/940c8a5044fd/10.1177_23814683251340055-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ead/12123149/940c8a5044fd/10.1177_23814683251340055-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ead/12123149/940c8a5044fd/10.1177_23814683251340055-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Role of Patient Preferences in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Decisions: A Qualitative Study.探索患者偏好在肝细胞癌治疗决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 May 29;10(1):23814683251340055. doi: 10.1177/23814683251340055. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Scoping review of values elicitation tools for treatment decisions in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝癌治疗决策中价值观评估工具的范围综述。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03167-1.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
5
What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists.在转移性乳腺癌的治疗决策中什么是重要的?对患者和肿瘤医生决策的定性分析。
Oncologist. 2019 Oct;24(10):1313-1321. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0711. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
7
8
Patient Experience of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Their Treatment Goals: An International Qualitative Study and Patient Journey Map.肝癌患者体验及其治疗目标:一项国际定性研究和患者旅程图。
Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3598-3614. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02939-1. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Exploring the Important Determinants Shaping Treatment Preferences: Qualitative Insights into Breast Cancer Patient Experiences and Perspectives in New Zealand.探索影响治疗偏好的重要决定因素:对新西兰乳腺癌患者经历和观点的定性洞察
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 22;17:3525-3537. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S443217. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of liver cancer mortality by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-19: a systematic analysis of health disparities.美国 2000-19 年按县、种族和族裔划分的肝癌死亡率负担:健康差距的系统分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Mar;9(3):e186-e198. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00002-1.
2
Scoping review of values elicitation tools for treatment decisions in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝癌治疗决策中价值观评估工具的范围综述。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03167-1.
3
Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
特瑞利木单抗联合度伐利尤单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Aug;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.美国肝病研究学会肝细胞癌预防、诊断和治疗实践指南。
Hepatology. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):1922-1965. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.澄清价值观:一项更新和扩展的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):801-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211037946.
6
National Trends and Waitlist Outcomes of Locoregional Therapy Among Liver Transplant Candidates With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States.美国肝细胞癌肝移植候选者局部区域治疗的全国趋势及等待名单结果
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):1142-1150.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.048. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
7
The FDA's patient-focused drug development initiative.美国食品药品监督管理局以患者为中心的药物研发倡议。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2021 Feb;19(2):70-72.
8
Combined locoregional and systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: finally, the future is obscure.晚期肝细胞癌的局部区域与全身联合治疗:最终,前景仍不明朗。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1700. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4164.
9
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1894-1905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.
10
Contemporary Epidemiology of Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis.慢性肝病和肝硬化的当代流行病学。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;18(12):2650-2666. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.060. Epub 2019 Aug 8.