Suppr超能文献

基于推断吸引力重力模型的农村医院实际可及性估计

Inferred Attractiveness Gravity-Based Models for Estimating Realized Access at Rural Hospitals.

作者信息

Harris Sean, McGarvey Ronald, Thorsen Andreas, Thorsen Maggie

机构信息

Jake Jabs College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Economie Management, F-59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

J Oper Res Soc. 2025;76(5):984-999. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2024.2406236. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

Abstract

Operating obstetric units in rural America is financially challenging in part due to low birth volume. Birth volume at a hospital decreases when birthers bypass it to go to a farther hospital. Beyond financial considerations, it is important from a healthcare equity perspective for hospitals to know whether certain subgroups of birthers avoid utilizing the hospital's services. This can better inform resource allocation decisions targeting those subgroups. In this paper, we use a nonlinear programming optimization model, inferred attractiveness gravity-based model (GBM), to estimate realized access to obstetric care at hospitals in Montana. We compare three variations of GBM and benchmark our results to a regression-based conditional logit model. Results indicate that hospital attractiveness varies across level of obstetric care provided and depends on the subgroup of birthers considered. While all GBMs produced smaller errors for hospitals with higher birth volume, our novel variant was more accurate for low volume hospitals. Bootstrapping analyses and resolving the models for population subgroups indicated large variations in hospital attractiveness. Research findings contribute to new knowledge about equity in access to obstetric care, the importance of considering population heterogeneity in GBMs, and the benefit of using hospital demand-based thresholds for GBMs in rural settings.

摘要

在美国农村地区运营产科单位在经济上具有挑战性,部分原因是低出生量。当产妇绕过一家医院前往更远的医院时,该医院的出生量就会下降。除了财务考虑之外,从医疗保健公平的角度来看,医院了解某些产妇亚群体是否避免使用该医院的服务非常重要。这可以更好地为针对这些亚群体的资源分配决策提供信息。在本文中,我们使用一种非线性规划优化模型,即基于吸引力推断的引力模型(GBM),来估计蒙大拿州各医院实际获得产科护理的情况。我们比较了GBM的三种变体,并将我们的结果与基于回归的条件logit模型进行了基准比较。结果表明,医院的吸引力因所提供的产科护理水平而异,并且取决于所考虑的产妇亚群体。虽然所有GBM对出生量较高的医院产生的误差较小,但我们的新变体对低出生量医院更为准确。对总体亚群体进行的自助分析和模型求解表明,医院吸引力存在很大差异。研究结果有助于获得有关产科护理公平性、在GBM中考虑人口异质性的重要性以及在农村地区使用基于医院需求的阈值进行GBM的益处等新知识。

相似文献

1
Inferred Attractiveness Gravity-Based Models for Estimating Realized Access at Rural Hospitals.
J Oper Res Soc. 2025;76(5):984-999. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2024.2406236. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
American Indians travel great distances for obstetrical care: Examining rural and racial disparities.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115897. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115897. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Rural Hospital Administrators' Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 25;3(3):e220204. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0204. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
A new model-based approach for estimating rural hospital markets.
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12924. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12924.
5
Evaluating disparities in access to obstetric services for American Indian women across Montana.
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):151-160. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12572. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2125373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25373.
8
Role of the general practitioner in improving rural healthcare access: a case from Nepal.
Hum Resour Health. 2018 May 10;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0287-7.
9
Why Are Obstetric Units in Rural Hospitals Closing Their Doors?
Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1546-60. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12441. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
American Indians travel great distances for obstetrical care: Examining rural and racial disparities.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115897. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115897. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Association of Driving Distance to Maternity Hospitals and Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov 1;140(5):812-819. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004960. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
Perinatal outcomes for rural obstetric patients and neonates in rural-located and metropolitan-located hospitals.
J Perinatol. 2022 Dec;42(12):1600-1606. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01490-7. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
4
Regionalization of neonatal care: benefits, barriers, and beyond.
J Perinatol. 2022 Jun;42(6):835-838. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01404-7. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
5
Measuring Spatial Accessibility of Urban Medical Facilities: A Case Study in Changning District of Shanghai in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 12;18(18):9598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189598.
7
Access to risk-appropriate hospital care and disparities in neonatal outcomes in racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban populations.
Semin Perinatol. 2021 Jun;45(4):151409. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151409. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Evaluating disparities in access to obstetric services for American Indian women across Montana.
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):151-160. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12572. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
The Health Equity Framework: A Science- and Justice-Based Model for Public Health Researchers and Practitioners.
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Nov;22(6):741-746. doi: 10.1177/1524839920950730. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Ambiguous Jurisdiction: Governmental Relationships that Affect American Indian Health Care Access.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(2):431-441. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0039.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验