Ben-Dor Miki, Barkai Ran
Department of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Front Nutr. 2025 May 16;12:1585182. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1585182. eCollection 2025.
The use of fire marks a critical milestone in human evolution, with its initial purposes debated among scholars. While cooking is often cited as the primary driver, this study proposes that meat and fat preservation, and predator protection were more likely the initial motivations for fire use by during the Lower Paleolithic (1.9-0.78 Ma).
Employing a bioenergetic approach, we compared the energetic returns of hunting versus plant gathering using ethnographic data, adjusted for Lower Paleolithic conditions. Caloric content of East African prey was calculated to assess consumption duration. Archeological evidence from early fire sites was analyzed for associations with large fauna.
Hunting large prey (>100 kg) yielded significantly higher energetic returns (16,269 ca/h) than plant gathering (1,443 ca/h), with megaherbivores like hippopotamus providing sustenance for up to 22 days for a group of 25. Early fire sites consistently contained large fauna remains, suggesting prolonged prey consumption. Cooking offered modest energetic gains (e.g., ~1,200 ca/h for meat), insufficient to offset fire maintenance costs, unlike preservation and protection.
The substantial energetic disparity supports hunting as a dominant subsistence strategy, with fire enhancing efficiency by preserving meat and deterring predators. The prevalence of megaherbivores in Lower Paleolithic sites and heightened predation risks underscore these priorities over cooking, which likely emerged as a secondary benefit. Ethnographic analogies underrepresent these dynamics due to megafaunal extinctions altering the environment and prey availability.
Meat preservation and predator protection, rather than cooking, were likely the primary drivers of early fire use, aligning with ' specialization in large prey acquisition. This reframes fire's role in human evolution, suggesting it supported a hypercarnivorous lifestyle and potentially influenced cognitive development.
火的使用标志着人类进化中的一个关键里程碑,其最初用途在学者中存在争议。虽然烹饪常被认为是主要驱动力,但本研究提出,在旧石器时代早期(190万 - 78万年前),肉类和脂肪保存以及抵御捕食者更有可能是用火的最初动机。
采用生物能量学方法,我们利用民族志数据比较了狩猎与植物采集的能量回报,并根据旧石器时代早期的条件进行了调整。计算了东非猎物的热量含量以评估食用时长。分析了早期用火遗址的考古证据,以寻找与大型动物群的关联。
猎杀大型猎物(>100千克)所获得的能量回报(16,269千卡/小时)显著高于植物采集(1,443千卡/小时),像河马这样的巨型食草动物可为25人的群体提供长达22天的食物。早期用火遗址一直都有大型动物遗骸,表明猎物食用时间延长。烹饪带来的能量增益适中(例如,肉类约为1,200千卡/小时),不足以抵消维持火的成本,与保存和保护不同。
巨大的能量差异支持狩猎作为主要的生存策略,火通过保存肉类和威慑捕食者提高了效率。旧石器时代早期遗址中巨型食草动物的普遍存在以及更高的捕食风险突出了这些优先事项高于烹饪,烹饪可能是后来才出现的次要好处。由于巨型动物灭绝改变了环境和猎物可得性,民族志类比未能充分体现这些动态。
肉类保存和抵御捕食者而非烹饪,可能是早期用火的主要驱动力,这与“大型猎物获取专业化”相一致。这重新界定了火在人类进化中的作用,表明它支持了一种超级食肉的生活方式,并可能影响了认知发展。