Martinho Diogo V, Clemente Filipe Manuel, Ángel-Gomez Miguel, Rebelo André, Field Adam, Santos Catarina C, Gouveia Élvio R, Afonso José, Sarmento Hugo
Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Laboratory of Robotics and Engineering Systems (LARSYS), Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI), Funchal, Portugal.
J Hum Kinet. 2025 Apr 30;96(Spec Issue):5-35. doi: 10.5114/jhk/203326. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Understanding how playing position influences physical, physiological, technical, and tactical demands in basketball is essential for optimizing training. Despite numerous studies examining these demands, there remains a need for a comprehensive review focused specifically on male basketball players. This scoping review aimed to summarize these demands during training sessions and games among male professional and semiprofessional basketball players according to playing positions. Following the PRISMA guidelines and its extensions for scoping reviews, four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched. Studies were included if they featured male professional or semiprofessional basketball players, assessments during training or games, and reported relevant demands. Forty-seven manuscripts were reviewed. Key findings revealed notable differences between positions: (i) (i) guards covered greater distances, performing more accelerations and decelerations compared to forwards and centers; (ii) forwards engaged in more high-speed and high-intensity running; (iii) centers demonstrated higher averages in successful shots and rebounds; and (iv) physiological responses, particularly heart rate, were predominantly higher among centers. In conclusion, this review provides coaches with critical insights into position-specific physical and physiological demands in basketball. Notably, methodological inconsistencies across the studies reviewed were observed. Hence, establishing standardized assessment methodologies and creating a common framework for normalizing physical, physiological, technical, and tactical variables is crucial for enhancing research comparability and practical application.
了解比赛位置如何影响篮球运动中的身体、生理、技术和战术需求对于优化训练至关重要。尽管有许多研究探讨了这些需求,但仍需要专门针对男性篮球运动员进行全面综述。本范围综述旨在根据比赛位置总结男性职业和半职业篮球运动员在训练课程和比赛中的这些需求。遵循PRISMA指南及其范围综述扩展版,检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science)。如果研究涉及男性职业或半职业篮球运动员、训练或比赛期间的评估以及报告了相关需求,则纳入研究。共审查了47篇手稿。主要发现揭示了不同位置之间的显著差异:(i)后卫比前锋和中锋覆盖的距离更远,进行更多的加速和减速;(ii)前锋进行更多的高速和高强度跑步;(iii)中锋在投篮和篮板方面的平均成功率更高;(iv)生理反应,特别是心率,在中锋中普遍更高。总之,本综述为教练提供了关于篮球比赛中特定位置身体和生理需求的关键见解。值得注意的是,在所审查的研究中观察到方法上的不一致。因此,建立标准化评估方法并创建一个用于规范身体、生理、技术和战术变量的通用框架对于提高研究可比性和实际应用至关重要。