• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同血流梯度和射血分数特征患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的临床结果

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Various Flow-Gradient and Ejection Fraction Profiles.

作者信息

Yamashita Yoshiyuki, Baudo Massimo, Sicouri Serge, Rodriguez Roberto, Gnall Eric M, Coady Paul M, Goldman Scott M, Gray William A, Ramlawi Basel

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 May 29;29(9):496-502. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5157.

DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5157
PMID:40454881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12417886/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replace-ment (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with different flow-gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) profiles.

METHODS

Patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR with newer generation valves (Sapien3/3 Ultra, Evolut Pro/Pro+/FX) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 5 groups: normal-flow high-gradient (NF-HG) AS (stroke volume index ≥ 35 mL/m2 and mean pressure gradient ≥ 40 mm Hg), low-flow high-gradient (LF-HG) with preserved EF (pEF, ≥ 50%), LF-HG with reduced EF (rEF), low-flow low-gradient (LF-LG) with pEF, and LF-LG with rEF.

RESULTS

A total of 846 patients were included in this study (NF-HG, n = 458; LF-HG with pEF, n = 142; LF-HG with rEF, n = 50; LF-LG with pEF, n = 113; LF-LG with rEF, n = 83). For the entire cohort, the median age was 82 years, and the periprocedural mortality rate was 2.1% with the highest rate in the LF-LG with rEF AS (7.2%). The 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were 13% and 51%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed higher all-cause mortality in the LF-HG with pEF (hazard ratio 1.42 [95% CI: 1.02-1.98]), LF-LG with pEF (1.84 [1.32-2.55]), and LF-LG with rEF (1.78 [1.22-2.61]) groups compared with the NF-HG group. Cardiovascular death rates were significantly higher in the LF-LG groups, but not in the LF-HG groups.

CONCLUSION

In addition to both LF-LG with pEF and rEF AS, LF-HG with pEF AS had a higher all-cause mortality rate after TAVR compared to NF-HG AS.

摘要

背景

比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗不同血流梯度和左心室射血分数(EF)的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的临床结局。

方法

回顾性分析接受新一代瓣膜(Sapien3/3 Ultra、Evolut Pro/Pro+/FX)TAVR治疗的严重AS患者。患者分为5组:正常血流高梯度(NF-HG)AS(每搏量指数≥35 mL/m2且平均压力梯度≥40 mmHg)、左室射血分数保留(pEF,≥50%)的低血流高梯度(LF-HG)、左室射血分数降低(rEF)的LF-HG、pEF的低血流低梯度(LF-LG)和rEF的LF-LG。

结果

本研究共纳入846例患者(NF-HG组458例;pEF的LF-HG组142例;rEF的LF-HG组50例;pEF的LF-LG组113例;rEF的LF-LG组83例)。整个队列的中位年龄为82岁,围手术期死亡率为2.1%,rEF的LF-LG AS组死亡率最高(7.2%)。1年和5年死亡率分别为13%和51%。多变量Cox回归分析显示,与NF-HG组相比,pEF的LF-HG组(风险比1.42[95%CI:1.02-1.98])、pEF的LF-LG组(1.84[1.32-2.55])和rEF的LF-LG组(1.78[1.22-2.61])的全因死亡率更高。LF-LG组的心血管死亡率显著更高,但LF-HG组并非如此。

结论

除了pEF和rEF的LF-LG AS外,与NF-HG AS相比,pEF的LF-HG AS在TAVR后全因死亡率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5d/12417886/a3cc632aabab/ajc-29-9-496_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5d/12417886/2644627cc2be/ajc-29-9-496_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5d/12417886/a3cc632aabab/ajc-29-9-496_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5d/12417886/2644627cc2be/ajc-29-9-496_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5d/12417886/a3cc632aabab/ajc-29-9-496_f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Various Flow-Gradient and Ejection Fraction Profiles.不同血流梯度和射血分数特征患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的临床结果
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 May 29;29(9):496-502. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5157.
2
Impact of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1481-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.038. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Impact of Flow-Gradient Patterns on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.血流梯度模式对射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术结局的影响。
Int Heart J. 2024 Nov 30;65(6):1033-1039. doi: 10.1536/ihj.24-284. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Serum ACE2 activity as a novel biomarker of assessment of severe aortic stenosis.血清血管紧张素转换酶2活性作为评估重度主动脉瓣狭窄的新型生物标志物。
Geroscience. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01792-6.
5
Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Among Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者结局的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;124(3):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.血流储备分数与梯度在左心室射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床决策中的整合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄:来自CURRENT AS注册研究-2的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb 24;18(4):471-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.044. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
8
True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.矛盾性低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的真性重度狭窄:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):366-377. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab010.
9
Clinical outcomes following TAVR for patients with low and very low gradient aortic stenosis.低梯度和极低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.09.005.
10
Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Systolic Function: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.主动脉瓣置换术对严重主动脉瓣狭窄和收缩功能保留的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05021-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在五年内的低危患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):1949-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307447. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients With Different Transvalvular Flow-Gradient Patterns.不同跨瓣血流梯度模式经导管主动脉瓣置换患者的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;209:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.095. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Low-flow, Low-gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Review.
低流量、低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄:综述
Heart Int. 2023 Jan 17;17(1):8-12. doi: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.1.8. eCollection 2023.
4
Mediators of Improvement in TAVR Outcomes Over Time: Insights From the STS-ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)疗效随时间改善的介导因素:STS-ACC TVT 注册研究的新见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul;16(7):e013080. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013080. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Clinical Outcomes in High-Gradient, Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, and Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Report From the SwissTAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高梯度、经典低流量-低梯度、低梯度和矛盾低流量-低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局:来自瑞士经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):e029489. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029489. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Nonsevere Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗射血分数降低和非重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;16(5):e012768. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012768. Epub 2023 May 16.
7
5-Year Follow-Up From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry for Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性主动脉生物瓣衰败的 PARTNER 2 注册研究 5 年随访结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):698-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.014.
8
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心脏瓣膜病管理指南。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 4;17(14):e1126-e1196. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-21-00009.
9
2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;162(2):e183-e353. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 8.
10
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.