Ibrahim Mohammed, Rahman Muhammad Kalimur, Bahraq Ashraf A
Applied Research Center for Metrology Standards and Testing, Research and Innovation, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Interdisciplinary Research Center for Construction and Building Materials, Research and Innovation, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 May;32(24):14891-14911. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36567-1. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
Some of the industrial solid waste materials, despite having sizeable quantities of silica and alumina, do not meet the requirements of a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) as per ASTM C618. Conversely, these materials may well be classified as alternative supplementary cementitious materials (ASCM) in accordance with ASTM C1709. Even though they have the potential of enhancing the properties of concrete and promoting sustainability, these materials are often underutilized in construction. In an asphalt batching drum plant, large quantities of waste silica-rich ASCM (SR-ASCM) are collected during the crushing and heating of limestone aggregates. Hence, the primary aim of this study was to find the feasibility of using SR-ASCM as a partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) for developing structurally viable and durable concrete towards a sustainable future. The raw SR-ASCM obtained from the plant was characterized to determine its mineralogical and morphological properties. Subsequently, the engineering properties and durability of concrete synthesized by partially replacing OPC with SR-ASCM were thoroughly investigated. Based on the characterization results, SR-ASCM failed to qualify as an SCM; however, due to its sizable pozzolanic activity, it could be classified as an ASCM. Concrete with 15% OPC replacement achieved a compressive strength of 51.9 MPa after 90 days, comparable to the control mix (51.0 MPa). There was remarkable resistance to chloride penetration in SR-ASCM-based concrete when the curing was extended from 7 to 90 days, with a 36% reduction in the chloride migration coefficient. These outcomes show that the mechanical properties and durability of SR-ASCM concrete were either equal to or better than those of conventional concrete. This was probably due to the SR-ASCM's pozzolanic reactivity and physical influence on the microstructure. A substantial reduction in CO emissions in the range of 14 to 33% was achieved across different replacement levels of OPC by SR-ASCM. Promoting the integration of such materials in concrete will have significant socio-economic and environmental advantages.
一些工业固体废料,尽管含有大量的二氧化硅和氧化铝,但根据ASTM C618的标准,并不符合辅助胶凝材料(SCM)的要求。相反,按照ASTM C1709的标准,这些材料很可能被归类为替代辅助胶凝材料(ASCM)。尽管它们有提升混凝土性能和促进可持续性的潜力,但这些材料在建筑中常常未得到充分利用。在一个沥青搅拌滚筒厂,在石灰石骨料的破碎和加热过程中会收集到大量富含二氧化硅的废弃替代辅助胶凝材料(SR-ASCM)。因此,本研究的主要目的是探究使用SR-ASCM部分替代普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)来开发结构可行且耐用的混凝土以迈向可持续未来的可行性。对从工厂获得的原始SR-ASCM进行了表征,以确定其矿物学和形态学特性。随后,对用SR-ASCM部分替代OPC合成的混凝土的工程性能和耐久性进行了深入研究。根据表征结果,SR-ASCM不符合SCM的标准;然而,由于其可观的火山灰活性,它可以被归类为ASCM。用15%的SR-ASCM替代OPC的混凝土在90天后的抗压强度达到了51.9MPa,与对照混合料(51.0MPa)相当。当养护时间从7天延长到9天0时,基于SR-ASCM的混凝土对氯离子渗透具有显著的抗性,氯离子迁移系数降低了36%。这些结果表明,SR-ASCM混凝土的力学性能和耐久性与传统混凝土相当或更好。这可能是由于SR-ASCM的火山灰反应性及其对微观结构的物理影响。通过SR-ASCM对OPC进行不同程度的替代,可使二氧化碳排放量大幅减少14%至33%。促进此类材料在混凝土中的应用将具有显著的社会经济和环境效益。