• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与听力损失相关的轮流发言时间变化会影响人们对对话的感知。

Hearing-loss related variations in turn-taking time affect how conversations are perceived.

作者信息

Petersen Eline Borch

机构信息

ORCA labs, Lynge, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0325244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325244. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325244
PMID:40455852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12129145/
Abstract

In conversations, interlocutors with hearing impairment (HI), initiate their turns with longer average delay and more variability than their normal-hearing (NH) conversation partners. This paper investigates whether third-party listeners were able to perceive this difference in turn-taking timing (denoted Floor-Transfer Offsets, FTOs) between NH and HI interlocutors. To this avail, the FTOs of segments of conversations were manipulated using four different schemes, such that the two interlocutors timed their turns as if 1) both were NH interlocutors conversing in quiet (NHQ) or 2) both were HI interlocutors conversing in noise (HIN). Two additional conditions were implemented to test if non-varying and faster FTOs affect the perception, manipulating conversations to have constant FTOs corresponding to 3) the median FTO of the NHQ condition (conNHQ) and 4) an even faster FTO of 50 ms (conLow). Forty-four participants rated conversations from the HIN condition as less natural, with poorer flow, and being more difficult to follow compared to conversations from the NHQ condition. Removing the FTO variability resulted in better ratings of flow (conNHQ vs NHQ), while further decreasing the average FTOs (conLow vs conNHQ) had no effect on the ratings. A detailed analysis revealed poorer ratings of flow for individual conversations with higher FTO median, but similar variability, while FTO variability alone did not affect ratings of flow. Together, the results indicate that listeners, and perhaps also conversation participants, are sensitive to small variations in turn-taking timing and that hearing loss may therefore affect the quality of conversations.

摘要

在对话中,听力受损(HI)的对话者比听力正常(NH)的对话伙伴发起轮次的平均延迟更长,且变化更大。本文研究第三方听众是否能够察觉到NH和HI对话者在话轮转换时机上的这种差异(称为“下限转移偏移”,FTOs)。为此,使用四种不同方案操纵对话片段的FTOs,使两位对话者的话轮时间安排就好像1)两人都是在安静环境中交谈的NH对话者(NHQ),或者2)两人都是在有噪音环境中交谈的HI对话者(HIN)。还实施了另外两个条件来测试不变的和更快的FTOs是否会影响感知,操纵对话使其具有对应于3)NHQ条件下的中位数FTO(conNHQ)和4)更快的50毫秒FTO(conLow)的恒定FTOs。与NHQ条件下的对话相比,44名参与者将HIN条件下的对话评为不那么自然、流畅性较差且更难理解。消除FTO的变异性会使流畅性评分更高(conNHQ与NHQ相比),而进一步降低平均FTOs(conLow与conNHQ相比)对评分没有影响。详细分析表明,对于FTO中位数较高但变异性相似的单个对话,流畅性评分较差,而仅FTO变异性不会影响流畅性评分。总之,结果表明听众,也许还有对话参与者,对话轮转换时机的微小变化很敏感,因此听力损失可能会影响对话质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/2a2650b1ea2d/pone.0325244.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/3af1cd999c7f/pone.0325244.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/c43ffa7163f4/pone.0325244.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/2a2650b1ea2d/pone.0325244.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/3af1cd999c7f/pone.0325244.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/c43ffa7163f4/pone.0325244.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/12129145/2a2650b1ea2d/pone.0325244.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Hearing-loss related variations in turn-taking time affect how conversations are perceived.与听力损失相关的轮流发言时间变化会影响人们对对话的感知。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0325244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325244. eCollection 2025.
2
Speak Up: How Hearing Loss and the Lack of Hearing Aids Affect Conversations in Quiet.大声说出来:听力损失和缺乏助听器如何影响安静环境下的对话。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2782-2793. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00667. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue Between Interlocutors With and Without Hearing Impairment.有听力障碍和无听力障碍的对话者之间任务对话中的对话动态。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241296073. doi: 10.1177/23312165241296073.
4
Investigating conversational dynamics in triads: Effects of noise, hearing impairment, and hearing aids.三人小组对话动态研究:噪音、听力障碍及助听器的影响
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1289637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1289637. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of Noise and Second Language on Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue.噪声和第二语言对任务对话中会话动态的影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211024482. doi: 10.1177/23312165211024482.
6
Timing in conversation is dynamically adjusted turn by turn in dyadic telephone conversations.会话中的时间在双人电话对话中会逐轮动态调整。
Cognition. 2022 May;222:105015. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105015. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.助听器放大和噪声对正常听力和听力障碍说话者之间会话动态的影响。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221103340. doi: 10.1177/23312165221103340.
8
Hearing Impairment Increases Communication Effort During Conversations in Noise.听力障碍会增加噪声环境下对话的交流努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 17;63(1):305-320. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00201. Print 2020 Jan 22.
9
Hearing Aid Amplification Reduces Communication Effort of People With Hearing Impairment and Their Conversation Partners.助听器放大功能可减少听力障碍者及其对话伙伴的沟通负担。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Apr 27;63(4):1299-1311. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00350. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
10
Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.具有正常听力和听力受损听众的自适应非线性频率压缩处理器的音质效果
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jul/Aug;30(7):552-563. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16179. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue Between Interlocutors With and Without Hearing Impairment.有听力障碍和无听力障碍的对话者之间任务对话中的对话动态。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241296073. doi: 10.1177/23312165241296073.
2
Speak Up: How Hearing Loss and the Lack of Hearing Aids Affect Conversations in Quiet.大声说出来:听力损失和缺乏助听器如何影响安静环境下的对话。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Aug 5;67(8):2782-2793. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00667. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Listening fast and slow.快听与慢听。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Oct;53:101658. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101658. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.助听器放大和噪声对正常听力和听力障碍说话者之间会话动态的影响。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221103340. doi: 10.1177/23312165221103340.
5
Fast response times signal social connection in conversation.快速的反应时间表明对话中有社会联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 25;119(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116915119.
6
Measuring Distribution Similarities Between Samples: A Distribution-Free Overlapping Index.测量样本间的分布相似性:一种无分布重叠指数。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01089. eCollection 2019.
7
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
8
Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language.轮流发言中的时间安排及其对语言处理模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 12;6:731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731. eCollection 2015.
9
Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances.充满活力的对话:未明确表述话语中言语行为识别的事件相关电位关联
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120068. eCollection 2015.
10
Early anticipation lies behind the speed of response in conversation.对话中的快速反应背后是提前预判。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2530-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00673. Epub 2014 Jun 4.