• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有听力障碍和无听力障碍的对话者之间任务对话中的对话动态。

Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue Between Interlocutors With and Without Hearing Impairment.

作者信息

Sørensen A Josefine Munch, Lunner Thomas, MacDonald Ewen N

机构信息

Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241296073. doi: 10.1177/23312165241296073.

DOI:10.1177/23312165241296073
PMID:39635767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618916/
Abstract

This study investigated the effects of noise and hearing impairment on conversational dynamics between pairs of young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired interlocutors. Twelve pairs of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals completed a spot-the-difference task in quiet and in three levels of multitalker babble. To achieve the rapid response timing of turn taking that has been observed in normal conversations, people must simultaneously comprehend incoming speech, plan a response, and predict when their partners will end their turn. In difficult conditions, we hypothesized that the timing of turn taking by both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired interlocutors would be delayed and more variable. We found that the timing of turn starts by talkers with hearing impairment had higher variability than those with normal hearing, and participants with both normal hearing and hearing impairment started turns later and with more variability in the presence of noise. Overall, in the presence of noise, talkers spoke louder and slower, increased the duration of their pauses but decreased their rate of occurrence, and produced longer interpausal units, that is, units of connected speech surrounded by silence. However, when compared to previous studies of conversations between normal-hearing partners, the pattern of changes in conversational behavior by the normal-hearing participants was very different in the most challenging noise condition. The extent to which these adaptations are made to reduce the difficulty experienced by their partner with hearing impairment vs. the difficulty they experience themselves is not clear.

摘要

本研究调查了噪音和听力障碍对年轻听力正常者与年长听力受损者之间对话动态的影响。十二对听力正常者和听力受损者在安静环境以及三种多说话者嘈杂程度水平下完成了找不同任务。为了实现正常对话中观察到的快速轮流回应时机,人们必须同时理解传入的语音、计划回应,并预测其伙伴何时结束发言。在困难条件下,我们假设听力正常者和听力受损者的轮流回应时机都会延迟且更具变异性。我们发现,听力受损的交谈者的轮流起始时机比听力正常者的变异性更高,并且听力正常和听力受损的参与者在有噪音的情况下开始发言的时间更晚且变异性更大。总体而言,在有噪音的情况下,交谈者说话声音更大、语速更慢,停顿时间增加但停顿频率降低,并且产生的停顿间单元更长,即由沉默包围的连贯语音单元。然而,与之前关于听力正常伙伴之间对话的研究相比,在最具挑战性的噪音条件下,听力正常参与者的对话行为变化模式非常不同。这些调整在多大程度上是为了减轻其听力受损伙伴所经历的困难,以及在多大程度上是为了减轻他们自己所经历的困难,尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/10baf670a0ec/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/3b9334ffc045/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/d4ec57fc4a0c/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/7477e77b39c9/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/301c5d164ef0/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/ea7df7068934/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/3cca3b71c35e/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/90e2089c1fe7/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/c7dd7e7e9553/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/5ee254d3615d/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/59ee73ff7889/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/97ffba505308/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/bf95d483cef5/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/2e7a1c9b5914/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/b3b3ad507293/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/1160d4197963/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/10baf670a0ec/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/3b9334ffc045/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/d4ec57fc4a0c/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/7477e77b39c9/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/301c5d164ef0/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/ea7df7068934/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/3cca3b71c35e/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/90e2089c1fe7/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/c7dd7e7e9553/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/5ee254d3615d/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/59ee73ff7889/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/97ffba505308/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/bf95d483cef5/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/2e7a1c9b5914/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/b3b3ad507293/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/1160d4197963/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d89/11618916/10baf670a0ec/10.1177_23312165241296073-fig16.jpg

相似文献

1
Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue Between Interlocutors With and Without Hearing Impairment.有听力障碍和无听力障碍的对话者之间任务对话中的对话动态。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241296073. doi: 10.1177/23312165241296073.
2
Speech-in-Noise Ability and Signal to Noise Ratio Predict the Timing of Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Intertalker Saccades When Observing Conversational Turn-Taking: An Explorative Investigation.噪声环境下的言语能力和信噪比可预测听力受损者在观察对话轮替时的跨说话者扫视时机:一项探索性研究。
Ear Hear. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001701.
3
Combined effects of age and hearing impairment on utterances and requests for clarification in spontaneous conversation and a referential communication task.年龄和听力障碍对自发对话和参照交流任务中话语和澄清请求的综合影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):293-303. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12940. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers.使用不同掩蔽噪声对正常听力和听力障碍者的言语识别率、反应时、言语率的自动测量及其与自我报告的听力努力度的关系。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241276435. doi: 10.1177/23312165241276435.
5
Processing of Visual Speech Cues in Speech-in-Noise Comprehension Depends on Working Memory Capacity and Enhances Neural Speech Tracking in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.视觉语音线索在噪声环境下言语理解中的处理依赖于工作记忆容量,并增强了听力障碍老年人的神经言语跟踪。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241287622. doi: 10.1177/23312165241287622.
6
Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.主动降噪在提高信噪比的听力设备中的可懂度增益建模。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241260029. doi: 10.1177/23312165241260029.
7
No association between idiopathic hidden hearing loss and behavioral adaptation to noise in humans.特发性隐匿性听力损失与人类对噪声的行为适应性之间无关联。
Hear Res. 2025 Aug;464:109321. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109321. Epub 2025 May 24.
8
Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users.专注于积极的聆听体验可提高有经验的助听器使用者的言语清晰度。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241246616. doi: 10.1177/23312165241246616.
9
Benefit of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Signal Enhancement for Speech Reception in Complex Listening Situations.助听放大和信号增强对复杂聆听环境下言语感知的益处。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241271407. doi: 10.1177/23312165241271407.
10
A Phoneme-Scale Assessment of Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms.多通道语音增强算法的音素级评估
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241292205. doi: 10.1177/23312165241292205.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing-loss related variations in turn-taking time affect how conversations are perceived.与听力损失相关的轮流发言时间变化会影响人们对对话的感知。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0325244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325244. eCollection 2025.
2
Pupil Responses During Interactive Conversation.互动对话期间的瞳孔反应。
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251342441. doi: 10.1177/23312165251342441. Epub 2025 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast response times signal social connection in conversation.快速的反应时间表明对话中有社会联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 25;119(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116915119.
2
Effects of Noise and Second Language on Conversational Dynamics in Task Dialogue.噪声和第二语言对任务对话中会话动态的影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211024482. doi: 10.1177/23312165211024482.
3
Conversational Interaction Is the Brain in Action: Implications for the Evaluation of Hearing and Hearing Interventions.对话互动是大脑在起作用:对听力评估及听力干预的启示。
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41 Suppl 1:56S-67S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000939.
4
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load.对话中话轮转换时的言语规划与加工负荷增加有关。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;43(7):e12768. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12768.
5
Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions.会话语音水平和实际声学条件下的信噪比。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Jan;145(1):349. doi: 10.1121/1.5087567.
6
Next Speakers Plan Their Turn Early and Speak after Turn-Final "Go-Signals".接下来,发言者提前规划自己的发言时机,并在轮次结束的“开始信号”后发言。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00393. eCollection 2017.
7
The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm.任务导向对话中话语规划的时机:来自一种新颖的列表完成范式的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 1;7:1858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858. eCollection 2016.
8
Never Say No... How the Brain Interprets the Pregnant Pause in Conversation.永远不要说“不”……大脑如何解读对话中的停顿。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145474. eCollection 2015.
9
Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation.在对话中,对即将到来的问题进行反应规划的神经信号出现在问题提出过程的中途。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 5;5:12881. doi: 10.1038/srep12881.
10
Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language.轮流发言中的时间安排及其对语言处理模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 12;6:731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731. eCollection 2015.