• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德发展中的个体差异:性别、社会性别与人格对道德的关系。

Individual differences in moral development: the relation of sex, gender, and personality to morality.

作者信息

Lifton P D

出版信息

J Pers. 1985 Jun;53(2):306-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00368.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00368.x
PMID:4045680
Abstract

Individual differences in moral development are examined, with a particular emphasis on sex and gender differences. This examination includes an extensive review of the empirical and theoretical literature in psychology on morality. Based on this review, it is concluded that sex differences occur with less frequency and with a less systematic favoring of males than is predicted by several theories of moral development. In addition, a study is presented which considers the relation of sex, gender, and personality to morality. Two age cohort samples, college sophomores (n = 169) and adults (n = 151), were assessed with the moral judgment scale of the cognitive-developmental model (Kohlberg, 1984) and a newly developed moral character template of the personological model (Lifton, in press). Participants also completed the CPI and MMPI personality inventories. Results of the study indicate (1) the absence of sex differences for either model, (2) the presence of gender differences favoring masculine persons for the cognitive-developmental but not personological model, and (3) that individual differences in moral development parallel individual differences in personality development. The implications of these findings are discussed with regard to Gilligan's (1982) claim that men and women differ in their moral orientations. Finally, it is argued that an individual difference approach, particularly one that emphasizes personality, would prove useful for future research on moral development.

摘要

本文考察了道德发展中的个体差异,尤其着重于性别差异。这种考察包括对心理学领域中关于道德的实证和理论文献的广泛综述。基于该综述,得出的结论是,与几种道德发展理论所预测的相比,性别差异出现的频率较低,且对男性的系统性偏袒较少。此外,本文还呈现了一项研究,该研究探讨了性别、社会性别与人格和道德之间的关系。研究使用认知发展模型(科尔伯格,1984)的道德判断量表和人格模型(利夫顿,即将发表)新开发的道德品质模板,对两个年龄组样本进行了评估,分别是大学二年级学生(n = 169)和成年人(n = 151)。参与者还完成了加州心理调查表(CPI)和明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)。研究结果表明:(1)两种模型均未发现性别差异;(2)在认知发展模型中存在有利于男性化个体的性别差异,但在人格模型中未发现;(3)道德发展中的个体差异与人格发展中的个体差异平行。本文讨论了这些发现对于吉利根(1982)提出的男女道德取向存在差异这一观点的意义。最后,本文认为个体差异研究方法,尤其是强调人格的方法,将对未来道德发展研究有用。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in moral development: the relation of sex, gender, and personality to morality.道德发展中的个体差异:性别、社会性别与人格对道德的关系。
J Pers. 1985 Jun;53(2):306-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00368.x.
2
Carol Gilligan's theory of sex differences in the development of moral reasoning during adolescence.卡罗尔·吉利根关于青少年道德推理发展中性别差异的理论。
Adolescence. 1988 Spring;23(89):229-43.
3
Why moral psychology needs personality psychology.为何道德心理学需要人格心理学。
J Pers. 2024 Jun;92(3):653-665. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12919. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
The measurement of principled morality by the Kohlberg Moral Dilemma Questionnaire.通过科尔伯格道德困境问卷对原则性道德进行测量。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):183-94. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674057.
5
A longitudinal study of moral reasoning.一项关于道德推理的纵向研究。
Child Dev. 1989 Feb;60(1):157-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02705.x.
6
Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries.67 个国家的道德判断中的性别差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 28;287(1937):20201201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach.内隐道德评价:一种多项式建模方法。
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Gender differences in moral orientation: a meta-analysis.道德取向中的性别差异:一项元分析
Psychol Bull. 2000 Sep;126(5):703-26. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703.
9
Social influence on group moral decisions: the interactive effects of moral reasoning and sex role orientation.社会对群体道德决策的影响:道德推理与性别角色取向的交互作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Dec;53(6):1080-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1080.
10
Hiding in plain view: An historical perspective on the study of morality in personality psychology.藏于众目睽睽之下:人格心理学中道德研究的历史透视。
J Pers. 2024 Jun;92(3):666-682. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12808. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Morality-Based Assertion and Homophily on Social Media: A Cultural Comparison Between English and Japanese Languages.社交媒体上基于道德的断言与同质性:英语和日语的文化比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 5;12:768856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768856. eCollection 2021.
2
Gender-related differences in moral judgments.道德判断中的性别差异。
Cogn Process. 2010 Aug;11(3):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0335-2. Epub 2009 Aug 30.