Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 28;287(1937):20201201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Most of the empirical research on sex differences and cultural variations in morality has relied on within-culture analyses or small-scale cross-cultural data. To further broaden the scientific understanding of sex differences in morality, the current research relies on two international samples to provide the first large-scale examination of sex differences in moral judgements nested within cultures. Using a sample from 67 countries (Study 1; = 336 691), we found culturally variable sex differences in moral judgements, as conceptualized by Moral Foundations Theory. Women consistently scored higher than men on Care, Fairness, and Purity. By contrast, sex differences in Loyalty and Authority were negligible and highly variable across cultures. Country-level sex differences in moral judgements were also examined in relation to cultural, socioeconomic, and gender-equality indicators revealing that sex differences in moral judgements are larger in individualist, Western, and gender-equal societies. In Study 2 (19 countries; = 11 969), these results were largely replicated using Bayesian multi-level modelling in a distinct sample. The findings were robust when incorporating cultural non-independence of countries into the models. Specifically, women consistently showed higher concerns for Care, Fairness, and Purity in their moral judgements than did men. Sex differences in moral judgements were larger in individualist and gender-equal societies with more flexible social norms. We discuss the implications of these findings for the ongoing debate about the origin of sex differences and cultural variations in moral judgements as well as theoretical and pragmatic implications for moral and evolutionary psychology.
大多数关于性别差异和道德文化差异的实证研究都依赖于文化内分析或小规模的跨文化数据。为了进一步拓宽对道德性别差异的科学理解,本研究依赖于两个国际样本,对文化内的道德判断中的性别差异进行了首次大规模检验。使用来自 67 个国家的样本(研究 1;n = 336691),我们发现了道德基础理论所概念化的道德判断中的文化变量性别差异。女性在关怀、公平和纯洁方面的得分始终高于男性。相比之下,忠诚和权威的性别差异微不足道,并且在文化之间高度可变。还研究了国家层面的道德判断性别差异与文化、社会经济和性别平等指标之间的关系,结果表明,在个人主义、西方和性别平等的社会中,道德判断的性别差异更大。在研究 2(19 个国家;n = 11969)中,使用贝叶斯多层次模型在另一个独立样本中进行了广泛的复制。当将国家的文化非独立性纳入模型时,结果是稳健的。具体而言,女性在道德判断中对关怀、公平和纯洁的关注始终高于男性。在个人主义和性别平等的社会中,以及社会规范更灵活的社会中,道德判断的性别差异更大。我们讨论了这些发现对关于性别差异和道德判断文化差异的起源的持续争论以及对道德和进化心理学的理论和实践意义。