C反应蛋白和血清淀粉样蛋白A作为鉴别儿童病毒性和细菌性社区获得性肺炎的互补生物标志物。

C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein as complementary biomarkers in differentiating viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children.

作者信息

Cheng Juan, Wu Ying, Ma Hui, Tang Mingyu, Wu Yufen, Yin Yong, Pan Qiuhui, Diao Qizhi, Zhang Jing

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hainan Branch, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Sanya, China.

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05770-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Distinguishing between viral and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children is crucial for guiding targeted management and antibiotic use. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of serum amyloid A protein(SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarkers to differentiate viral from bacterial CAP in children.

METHODS

A total of 441 hospitalized children with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP were initially selected. Of these, 206 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 132 cases of viral pneumonia and 74 cases of bacterial pneumonia. Baseline data and clinical characteristics were collected. Respiratory pathogen detection and blood biomarker measurements, including SAA and CRP levels, were completed within 24 h of admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the effectiveness of SAA, CRP, and their combination in differentiating between viral and bacterial CAP.

RESULTS

Fever (body temperature ≥ 38 °C) was more frequently observed in the bacterial CAP group (95.9%) compared to the viral CAP group (75%, P = 0.000). Wheezing was more prevalent in the viral CAP group (40.2% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.022). CRP and SAA levels were significantly higher in the bacterial CAP group (CRP: 27.6 (6.5, 49.4) mg/L vs. 3 (0.7, 8.4) mg/L, P = 0.000; SAA: 190.1 (70, 297.4) mg/L vs. 13.5 (1.4, 48.2) mg/L, P = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve for CRP and SAA was 0.84 (0.78 ∼ 0.90) and 0.85 (0.79 ∼ 0.91), respectively. The cutoff points were 86.55 mg/L for SAA and 19.65 mg/L for CRP, with sensitivities of 86.9% and 94.6%, and specificities of 73.0% and 63.5%, respectively. Combining SAA and CRP detection with clinical symptoms increases specificity to 93.2% and 97.3% but reduces sensitivity to 31.3% and 22.7% in distinguishing viral from bacterial pneumonia. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that CRP was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia (OR = 1.098, P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with SAA (Pearson r = 0.816, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CRP and SAA are effective biomarkers for distinguishing between viral and bacterial CAP in children, with CRP demonstrating independent predictive value. The combined detection of CRP and SAA, along with clinical symptoms (such as fever or wheezing), significantly enhances diagnostic specificity but requires a trade-off with reduced sensitivity. This finding provides important evidence for the early precise classification of pediatric CAP and the rational use of antibiotics, but its clinical value still needs to be validated through larger-scale multicenter studies.

摘要

目的

区分儿童病毒性和细菌性社区获得性肺炎(CAP)对于指导针对性治疗和抗生素使用至关重要。本研究旨在评估血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)和C反应蛋白(CRP)作为区分儿童病毒性与细菌性CAP生物标志物的有效性。

方法

最初选取441例确诊为CAP的住院儿童。其中,206例符合纳入和排除标准,包括132例病毒性肺炎和74例细菌性肺炎。收集基线数据和临床特征。在入院24小时内完成呼吸道病原体检测和血液生物标志物测量,包括SAA和CRP水平。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以评估SAA、CRP及其联合检测在区分病毒性和细菌性CAP方面的有效性。

结果

与病毒性CAP组(75%)相比,细菌性CAP组发热(体温≥38°C)更为常见(95.9%,P = 0.000)。喘息在病毒性CAP组更为普遍(40.2%对24.3%,P = 0.022)。细菌性CAP组的CRP和SAA水平显著更高(CRP:27.6(6.5,49.4)mg/L对3(0.7,8.4)mg/L,P = 0.000;SAA:190.1(70,297.4)mg/L对13.5(1.4,48.2)mg/L,P = 0.000)。CRP和SAA的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.84(0.78~0.90)和0.85(0.79~0.91)。SAA的截断点为86.55mg/L,CRP的截断点为19.65mg/L,敏感性分别为86.9%和94.6%;特异性分别为73.0%和63.5%。将SAA和CRP检测与临床症状相结合,在区分病毒性与细菌性肺炎时,特异性分别提高到93.2%和97.3%,但敏感性分别降低到31.3%和22.7%。多因素回归分析证实,CRP是细菌性肺炎的独立预测因子(OR = 1.098,P < 0.001),且与SAA高度相关(Pearson r = 0.816,P < 0.001)。

结论

CRP和SAA是区分儿童病毒性和细菌性CAP的有效生物标志物,CRP具有独立预测价值。CRP和SAA联合检测并结合临床症状(如发热或喘息)可显著提高诊断特异性,但需要以降低敏感性为代价。这一发现为儿童CAP的早期精准分类和抗生素的合理使用提供了重要依据,但其临床价值仍需通过大规模多中心研究进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索