Peng Chunchao, Fu Guohui, Chai Jingping, A Jide, Guang Wenhui
Department of Anesthesiology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.
Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 May 19;15:1539241. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539241. eCollection 2025.
To assess the impact of ultrasound-guided multimodal anesthesia utilizing a modified subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in conjunction with general anesthesia on perioperative opioid consumption among patients undergoing gynecologic endoscopic surgery.
A total of 56 patients aged 18-65 years, classified as ASA physical status I-II, with a BMI of 18-30 kg.m², were recruited from Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital between June 2023 and August 2024 for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. According to the random number table method, patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the improved subcostal border anterior quadrate block combined with general anesthesia group (Group A) and the traditional anterior quadrate block combined with general anesthesia group (Group B), each comprising 28 patients. Both groups underwent tracheal intubation and general anesthesia. Before anesthesia induction, patients in Group A received 0.33% ropivacaine (20 ml per side) administered bilaterally under ultrasound guidance for the improved anterior quadratus lumborum block. In contrast, patient in Group B received 0.33% ropivacaine (20 ml per side) administered bilaterally under ultrasound. Following the surgical procedure, both groups were administered controlled patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The administration of perioperative opioids (including intraoperative remifentanil dosage and postoperative opioid dosage) as well as propofol was systematically recorded during the follow-up period; VAS scores were recorded both at dynamic and static at 2 hours, 6 hours,-24 hours, and 48 hours post-intervention; The number of effective analgesic pump activations within-48 hours post-operation was recorded. Additionally, the time of the first anal exhaust and the time of feeding within 48 hours after surgery were documented. Postoperative adverse reactions, including skin itching, nausea or vomiting, and dizziness, were also observed.
Compared to Group B, Group A exhibited a significantly lower dosage of remifentanil (1.49 ± 0.50 mg vs 1.86 ± 0.77 mg, P<0.05) and postoperative opioids (median, 31.79 μg with IQR 23.04-42.75μg vs median, 42.30μgwith IQR 43.26-44.64μg), P<0.05); The dynamic and static VAS scores of patients in Group A were significantly reduced at 2 hours (median 3.00 with IQR 2.00-3.00 vs median 4.00 2with IQR 4.00-4.50, median 3.00 with IQR 2.00-3.00 vs median 3.00 with IQR 3.00-4.00, P<0.001), 6 hours (median 3.00 with IQR 2.00-3.50 vs median 4.00 with IQR 4.00-4.50, median 2.00 with IQR 2.00-3.00 vs median 3.50 with IQR 3.00-4.00, P<0.001) and 24 hours (median 3.00 with IQR 3.00-4.00 vs median 4.00 with IQR 3.50, 4.50, median 3.00 with IQR2.00-3.00 vs median 3.00 with IQR 3.00-4.00, P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in dynamic and static VAS scores between the two groups at 48 hours (P=0.568, P = 0.109); The number of analgesic pump compressions in Group A significantly decreased at 48 hours post-surgery (median,0.00 with IQR 1.00-2.00) vs median,1.50 with IQR 0.25-4.00, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the propofol dosage between the two groups (P=0.667); The A group achieved earlier oral feeding (median 25.00 h with IQR 20.00-30.00 h vs median 33.25 h with IQR 21.50-38.00 h,P<0.05), earlier anal release of gas (median 24.00 h with IQR 21.00-30.00 h vs median 32.00 h with IQR 24.50-38.00, P<0.05); Compared with Group B, the incidence of postoperative dizziness (10% vs 21%, P<0.05), nausea or vomiting (4% vs 17%, P<0.001), and skin pruritus(0% vs 9%, P<0.05) in Group A was significantly reduced (P<0.05).
Compared to the traditional anterior quadratus lumborum block, the modified subcostal edge anterior quadratus lumborum block significantly decreases perioperative opioid consumption in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients, effectively alleviates postoperative pain, accelerates gastrointestinal function recovery, and minimizes adverse reactions.
评估超声引导下改良肋缘下前路腰方肌阻滞(QLB)联合全身麻醉对妇科内镜手术患者围手术期阿片类药物消耗量的影响。
选取2023年6月至2024年8月在青海省人民医院招募的56例年龄在18 - 65岁、ASA身体状况为I - II级、BMI为18 - 30 kg·m²的患者,进行择期腹腔镜妇科手术。根据随机数字表法,将患者随机分为两组:改良肋缘下前路腰方肌阻滞联合全身麻醉组(A组)和传统前路腰方肌阻滞联合全身麻醉组(B组),每组28例。两组均行气管插管全身麻醉。麻醉诱导前,A组患者在超声引导下双侧接受0.33%罗哌卡因(每侧20 ml)用于改良前路腰方肌阻滞。相比之下,B组患者在超声引导下双侧接受0.33%罗哌卡因(每侧20 ml)。手术结束后,两组均给予患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。在随访期间系统记录围手术期阿片类药物(包括术中瑞芬太尼用量和术后阿片类药物用量)以及丙泊酚的使用情况;在干预后2小时、6小时、24小时和48小时记录动态和静态VAS评分;记录术后48小时内有效镇痛泵启动次数。此外,记录术后首次排气时间和术后48小时内进食时间。观察术后不良反应,包括皮肤瘙痒、恶心或呕吐以及头晕。
与B组相比,A组瑞芬太尼用量(1.49±0.50 mg vs 1.86±0.77 mg,P<0.05)和术后阿片类药物用量(中位数,31.79μg,IQR为23.04 - 42.75μg vs中位数,42.30μg,IQR为43.26 - 44.64μg)显著降低(P<0.05);A组患者在2小时(中位数3.00,IQR为2.00 - 3.00 vs中位数4.00,IQR为4.00 - 4.50,中位数3.00,IQR为2.00 - 3.00 vs中位数3.00,IQR为3.00 - 4.00,P<0.001)、6小时(中位数3.00,IQR为2.00 - 3.50 vs中位数4.00,IQR为4.00 - 4.50,中位数2.00,IQR为2.00 - 3.00 vs中位数3.50,IQR为3.00 - 4.00,P<0.001)和24小时(中位数3.00,IQR为3.00 - 4.00 vs中位数4.00,IQR为3.50 - 4.50,中位数3.00,IQR为2.00 - 3.00 vs中位数3.00,IQR为3.00 - 4.00,P<0.05)的动态和静态VAS评分显著降低;两组在48小时时的动态和静态VAS评分无统计学差异(P = 0.568,P = 0.109);A组术后48小时镇痛泵按压次数显著减少(中位数,0.00,IQR为1.00 - 2.00)vs中位数,1.50,IQR为0.25 - 4.00,P<0.05)。两组丙泊酚用量无统计学差异(P = 0.667);A组实现了更早的经口进食(中位数25.00 h,IQR为20.00 - 30.00 h vs中位数33.25 h,IQR为21.50 - 38.00 h,P<0.05),更早的肛门排气(中位数24.00 h,IQR为21.00 - 30.00 h vs中位数32.00 h,IQR为24.50 - 38.00,P<0.05);与B组相比,A组术后头晕发生率(10% vs 21%,P<0.05)、恶心或呕吐发生率(4% vs 17%,P<0.001)和皮肤瘙痒发生率(0% vs 9%,P<0.05)显著降低(P<0.05)。
与传统前路腰方肌阻滞相比,改良肋缘下前路腰方肌阻滞显著降低了妇科腹腔镜手术患者围手术期阿片类药物消耗量,有效减轻了术后疼痛,加速了胃肠功能恢复,并减少了不良反应。