Jensen Emilija D, Soares Gustavo, Ju Xiangqun, Moore Mark, Oliver Kelly, Roberts Rachel, Anderson Peter J, Jamieson Lisa M
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia.
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Sep;53(9):1320-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.003. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
There is wide variability in the prevalence of orofacial clefts at birth across geographic locations. The study aimed to quantify the prevalence of orofacial clefts and provide demographic details of the individuals identified with an orofacial cleft in South Australia.
The South Australian Birth Defects Register (SABDR) data was used to identify individuals born in South Australia with any orofacial cleft including cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CL + P), cleft palate (CP), cleft uvula (CU) and facial clefts (FC) between 1986 and 2019. The proportion of orofacial clefts for livebirths was calculated by sex, Indigenous status, geographic location, socioeconomic status, maternal age, plurality, gestation, birthweight and family history of orofacial clefts.
A total of 1127 individuals were identified as having an orofacial cleft and livebirth: with a combined prevalence of 17.1 in 10,000 or 1 in 580 livebirths for all orofacial clefts. The prevalence for CL was 3.3 per 10,000, CL + P was 5.4 per 10,000, CP was 8.1 per 10,000, CU was 0.2 per 10,000 and FC was 0.1 in 10,000. A greater proportion of orofacial cleft diagnoses were male, born in major cities, non-Indigenous, higher SES, lower maternal age, normal gestational age and birthweight, non-syndromic diagnoses, with no family history of orofacial clefts.
Prevalence data provides an understanding of individuals born with orofacial clefts in South Australia since 1986 which are comparative to national and international birth registries. The quality of the SABDR is high and provides a reference for comparison to published prevalence reports.
出生时口面部裂隙的患病率在不同地理位置存在很大差异。本研究旨在量化南澳大利亚口面部裂隙的患病率,并提供被确诊为口面部裂隙患者的人口统计学细节。
利用南澳大利亚出生缺陷登记处(SABDR)的数据,确定1986年至2019年间在南澳大利亚出生的患有任何口面部裂隙的个体,包括唇裂(CL)、唇腭裂(CL + P)、腭裂(CP)、悬雍垂裂(CU)和面部裂隙(FC)。按性别、原住民身份、地理位置、社会经济地位、母亲年龄、产次、孕周、出生体重和口面部裂隙家族史计算活产儿中口面部裂隙的比例。
共识别出1127例患有口面部裂隙的活产儿:所有口面部裂隙的综合患病率为万分之17.1,即580例活产儿中有1例患病。CL的患病率为万分之3.3,CL + P为万分之5.4,CP为万分之8.1,CU为万分之0.2,FC为万分之0.1。口面部裂隙诊断中男性、出生在大城市、非原住民、社会经济地位较高、母亲年龄较小、孕周和出生体重正常、非综合征诊断且无口面部裂隙家族史的比例更高。
患病率数据有助于了解自1986年以来南澳大利亚出生的患有口面部裂隙的个体情况,可与国家和国际出生登记处的数据进行比较。SABDR的质量很高,为与已发表的患病率报告进行比较提供了参考。