Lee Kang Suk, Lee Song Yi
Research Institute for Image & Cultural Contents, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Counseling and Coaching, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(1):19455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05126-6.
Although numerous studies examine violence portrayed in the media, few have explored how viewers subjectively perceive it despite the presence of contradictory viewpoints. This study employs Q methodology to investigate South Korean college students' subjective perceptions of media violence. The Q sample comprises 33 statements, and the P-set includes 17 university students. The analysis reveals three perception types. Type 1 (Media Violence Freedom Advocates) believe that personal values influence media violence and do not view it as a problem. They argue that regulating media violence would infringe on freedom of expression. Type 2 (Media Violence Personal Responsibility Emphasizers) view media violence as a means of portraying social issues and find violent content engaging, assuming that wrongdoers ultimately receive punishment. Lastly, Type 3 (Media Violence Ethics and Regulation Advocates) supports regulating media violence and implementing appropriate educational initiatives to address this issue. Understanding these perspectives among college students provides valuable insights for developing media regulations and educational policies.
尽管有大量研究探讨了媒体中呈现的暴力内容,但很少有研究探讨观众在存在矛盾观点的情况下如何主观地看待它。本研究采用Q方法来调查韩国大学生对媒体暴力的主观认知。Q样本包括33条陈述,P组包括17名大学生。分析揭示了三种认知类型。类型1(媒体暴力自由倡导者)认为个人价值观会影响媒体暴力,并不将其视为问题。他们认为对媒体暴力进行监管会侵犯言论自由。类型2(媒体暴力个人责任强调者)将媒体暴力视为描绘社会问题的一种手段,并觉得暴力内容很吸引人,认为违法者最终会受到惩罚。最后,类型3(媒体暴力伦理与监管倡导者)支持对媒体暴力进行监管,并实施适当的教育举措来解决这个问题。了解大学生中的这些观点为制定媒体监管和教育政策提供了宝贵的见解。