• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据改良的路易斯湖标准,心血管磁共振参数成像在急性心肌炎中的诊断性能:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping as per modified Lake Louise Criteria in acute myocarditis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Giri Latika, Singh Roshan, Marey Ahmed, Li Yupeng, Venkatesh Bharath Ambale, Abdulla Jawdat, Zimmerman Stefan, Umair Muhammad

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun 3;33(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s44348-025-00048-3.

DOI:10.1186/s44348-025-00048-3
PMID:40462222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131415/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping parameters-native T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV)-are key for diagnosing acute myocarditis under the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria (mLLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated their diagnostic performance and established optimal thresholds for acute myocarditis.

METHODS

We reviewed articles published in the past decade utilizing parametric mapping for myocarditis diagnosis. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted. Quality assessment was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with 677 patients were included. Native T1 mapping showed sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 86%, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 39, and an AUC of 0.91. T2 mapping had sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 86%, DOR of 25, and an AUC of 0.89. ECV demonstrated sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 81%, DOR of 13, and an AUC of 0.83. Mean control values were 1,039 ± 39.23 ms for native T1 mapping, 57 ± 5.18 ms for T2 mapping, and 31% ± 5.60% for ECV. Optimal thresholds were 1,021 ms for native T1 mapping, 52 ms for T2 mapping, and 28% for ECV based on receiver operating characteristic curves analysis based on 1.5-T scanner value. Native T1 mapping showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analysis found no significant sensitivity differences based on biopsy or clinical criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Parametric mapping, particularly native T1, demonstrated strong diagnostic performance for acute myocarditis compared to T2 mapping and ECV within the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria framework. Incorporating these cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy. Further research is recommended to refine these findings and optimize diagnostic strategies.

摘要

背景

心血管磁共振成像参数——固有T1成像、T2成像和细胞外容积(ECV)——是根据2018年修订的路易斯湖标准(mLLC)诊断急性心肌炎的关键。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了它们的诊断性能,并确定了急性心肌炎的最佳阈值。

方法

我们回顾了过去十年中利用参数成像诊断心肌炎的文章。提取了敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)的数据。由两名独立评审员使用QUADAS-2工具进行质量评估。

结果

纳入了11项研究,共677例患者。固有T1成像的敏感性为83%,特异性为86%,诊断比值比(DOR)为39,AUC为0.91。T2成像的敏感性为81%,特异性为86%,DOR为25,AUC为0.89。ECV的敏感性为71%,特异性为81%,DOR为13,AUC为0.83。固有T1成像的平均对照值为1039±39.23毫秒,T2成像为57±5.18毫秒,ECV为31%±5.60%。根据基于1.5-T扫描仪值的受试者工作特征曲线分析,固有T1成像的最佳阈值为1021毫秒,T2成像为52毫秒,ECV为28%。固有T1成像显示出最高的诊断准确性。亚组分析发现,基于活检或临床标准,敏感性无显著差异。

结论

在2018年修订的路易斯湖标准框架内,与T2成像和ECV相比,参数成像,尤其是固有T1成像,对急性心肌炎具有较强的诊断性能。纳入这些心血管磁共振参数可能会提高诊断准确性。建议进一步研究以完善这些发现并优化诊断策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/dd5fe4b9df76/44348_2025_48_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/b9f7c497690c/44348_2025_48_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/cf30392ac9dd/44348_2025_48_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/cfe58ebdcf57/44348_2025_48_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/9aeb716a272f/44348_2025_48_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/32e141cb9baf/44348_2025_48_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/dd5fe4b9df76/44348_2025_48_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/b9f7c497690c/44348_2025_48_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/cf30392ac9dd/44348_2025_48_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/cfe58ebdcf57/44348_2025_48_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/9aeb716a272f/44348_2025_48_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/32e141cb9baf/44348_2025_48_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3571/12131415/dd5fe4b9df76/44348_2025_48_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping as per modified Lake Louise Criteria in acute myocarditis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.根据改良的路易斯湖标准,心血管磁共振参数成像在急性心肌炎中的诊断性能:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun 3;33(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s44348-025-00048-3.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Extracellular Volume, Native T1, and T2 Mapping Versus Lake Louise Criteria by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Acute Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis.基于心脏磁共振的细胞外容积、心肌 T1 及 T2 比值mapping 与 Lake Louise 标准对急性心肌炎的诊断性能比较:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;11(7):e007598. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007598.
3
Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T1 and T2 mapping in pediatric patients with acute myocarditis.心血管磁共振 native T1 和 T2 mapping 在儿科急性心肌炎患者中的诊断性能。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jul 15;21(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0550-7.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心血管磁共振在急性心肌炎中的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
5
Performance of native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping to detect myocardial damage in patients with suspected myocarditis: a head-to-head comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques.对比增强T1映射与常规T1映射在疑似心肌炎患者中检测心肌损伤的性能:不同心血管磁共振技术的直接比较
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Apr;33(4):539-547. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1029-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
Detection of acute myocarditis using T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.采用 T1 和 T2 映射心血管磁共振技术检测急性心肌炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):239-248. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13365. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
7
Diagnostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Literature Review.心血管磁共振 T1 和 T2 映射在急性心肌炎中的诊断价值:系统文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 18;60(7):1162. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071162.
8
Multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric and adolescent patients with acute myocarditis.儿科和青少年急性心肌炎的多参数心脏磁共振成像。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Dec;51(13):2470-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05169-7. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria With Endomyocardial Biopsy Confirmation.急性心肌炎的多参数心血管磁共振成像:2009年和2018年路易斯湖标准与心内膜心肌活检确诊结果的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 12;8:739892. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.739892. eCollection 2021.
10
CMR in patients with severe myocarditis: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers including extracellular volume imaging.严重心肌炎患者的 CMR:包括细胞外容积成像在内的定量组织标志物的诊断价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;7(7):667-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of myocardial fibrosis: Where we stand.心肌纤维化的检测:我们目前的进展
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 29;9:926378. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.926378. eCollection 2022.
2
Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Detect Subacute Myocarditis.综合心脏磁共振成像检测亚急性心肌炎
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):5113. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175113.
3
T and T mapping and weighted imaging in cardiac MRI.心脏 MRI 的 T 和 T 映射及加权成像。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Nov;93:15-32. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria With Endomyocardial Biopsy Confirmation.急性心肌炎的多参数心血管磁共振成像:2009年和2018年路易斯湖标准与心内膜心肌活检确诊结果的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 12;8:739892. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.739892. eCollection 2021.
5
Acute myocarditis: aetiology, diagnosis and management.急性心肌炎:病因、诊断与治疗。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Sep;21(5):e505-e510. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0121.
6
Multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric and adolescent patients with acute myocarditis.儿科和青少年急性心肌炎的多参数心脏磁共振成像。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Dec;51(13):2470-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05169-7. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review.心脏活检现状:临床综述
CJC Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(4):524-531. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.017. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Comparison of Original and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis: Results of a Validation Cohort.急性心肌炎诊断的原始标准与2018年路易斯湖标准的比较:一个验证队列的结果
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019 Jul 25;1(3):e190010. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019190010. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
The Role of Native T1 Mapping in the Diagnosis of Myocarditis in a Real-World Setting.在实际临床环境中,心肌T1 mapping成像在心肌炎诊断中的作用
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):3810. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123810.
10
Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions.心肌炎和炎性心肌病:当前的证据和未来的方向。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Mar;18(3):169-193. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00435-x. Epub 2020 Oct 12.