• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胚胎干细胞对DNA复制应激的特异性反应。

Embryonic Stem Cell-Specific Responses to DNA Replication Stress.

作者信息

James Ryan C, Wang Jerry K, Bhatt Siddhanth R, Shadid Sophie E, Phuong Daryl J, Schimenti John C

机构信息

Cornell University, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Cornell University, Dept. of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2025 May 18:2025.05.16.654332. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.16.654332.

DOI:10.1101/2025.05.16.654332
PMID:40463205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12132374/
Abstract

Genome maintenance is of the utmost importance in stem cells, as mutations can be propagated and cause defects in derivative tissues. Many stem cell types display low mutation rates, with embryonic stem cells (ESCs) being a notable example. The bases for this property are unclear but may be achieved by optimization of various processes including high-fidelity DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint controls, and hypersensitivity to genotoxic insults that trigger cell death. Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the unique responses of mouse ESCs (mESCs) to replication stress (RS) using an array of small molecule inhibitors and genotoxins. We find that whereas mESCs survive under acute RS in an ATR- and CHK1-dependent manner similar to somatic cells, they lack a strong G2/M checkpoint and fail to repair DNA crosslinks in the absence of ATR signaling. Despite the lack of a strong G2/M checkpoint, mESCs maintain a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). We posit that mESCs preferentially repair DNA crosslinks in S phase via homology-directed mechanisms, and cells that fail to complete repair before mitosis undergo mitotic catastrophe and cell death. These findings shed light on mutation avoidance mechanisms in ESCs that may extend to other stem cell types.

摘要

基因组维持在干细胞中至关重要,因为突变可能会传播并导致衍生组织出现缺陷。许多干细胞类型的突变率较低,胚胎干细胞(ESC)就是一个显著的例子。这种特性的基础尚不清楚,但可能是通过优化各种过程来实现的,包括高保真DNA修复、细胞周期检查点控制以及对引发细胞死亡的基因毒性损伤的超敏反应。在这里,我们使用一系列小分子抑制剂和基因毒素来研究小鼠胚胎干细胞(mESC)对复制应激(RS)的独特反应背后的机制。我们发现,虽然mESC在急性RS下以类似于体细胞的依赖ATR和CHK1的方式存活,但它们缺乏强大的G2/M检查点,并且在没有ATR信号的情况下无法修复DNA交联。尽管缺乏强大的G2/M检查点,但mESC维持着纺锤体组装检查点(SAC)。我们推测,mESC在S期通过同源定向机制优先修复DNA交联,而在有丝分裂前未能完成修复的细胞会经历有丝分裂灾难和细胞死亡。这些发现揭示了ESC中可能扩展到其他干细胞类型的避免突变机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/57e937e14844/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/f846b0ae22ef/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/422cc81254c5/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/52a48370d32e/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/34eb0da29d14/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/57e937e14844/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/f846b0ae22ef/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/422cc81254c5/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/52a48370d32e/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/34eb0da29d14/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6ee/12132374/57e937e14844/nihpp-2025.05.16.654332v1-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Embryonic Stem Cell-Specific Responses to DNA Replication Stress.胚胎干细胞对DNA复制应激的特异性反应。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 18:2025.05.16.654332. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.16.654332.
2
[Analysis of irradiation-induced repair foci in mouse embryonic stem cells].[小鼠胚胎干细胞中辐射诱导修复灶的分析]
Tsitologiia. 2014;56(5):340-5.
3
Chk1 dynamics in G2 phase upon replication stress predict daughter cell outcome.复制应激下G2期的Chk1动态变化可预测子细胞的结局。
Dev Cell. 2022 Mar 14;57(5):638-653.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
4
ATR-Chk1 activation mitigates replication stress caused by mismatch repair-dependent processing of DNA damage.ATR-Chk1 的激活缓解了由 DNA 损伤错配修复依赖性处理引起的复制应激。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):1523-1528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720355115. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.RPA32 丝氨酸 4/丝氨酸 8 的 DNA 依赖蛋白激酶磷酸化调节复制应激检查点激活、叉形重启、同源重组和有丝分裂灾难。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2014 Sep;21:131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
Human embryonic stem cells fail to activate CHK1 and commit to apoptosis in response to DNA replication stress.人类胚胎干细胞在应对 DNA 复制压力时无法激活 CHK1 并促使其凋亡。
Stem Cells. 2012 Jul;30(7):1385-93. doi: 10.1002/stem.1117.
7
Distinct roles for DNA-PK, ATM and ATR in RPA phosphorylation and checkpoint activation in response to replication stress.复制压力下,DNA-PK、ATM 和 ATR 在 RPA 磷酸化和检查点激活中发挥不同作用。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Nov;40(21):10780-94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks849. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
8
Exploring the ATR-CHK1 pathway in the response of doxorubicin-induced DNA damages in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.探讨 ATR-CHK1 通路在阿霉素诱导的急性淋巴细胞白血病细胞 DNA 损伤反应中的作用。
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2023 Jun;39(3):795-811. doi: 10.1007/s10565-021-09640-x. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
9
Determinants of mitotic catastrophe on abrogation of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint by UCN-01.UCN-01 阻断 G2 DNA 损伤检查点后有丝分裂灾难的决定因素。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 May;10(5):784-94. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0809. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
10
DNA damage-induced degradation of Cdc25A does not lead to inhibition of Cdk2 activity in mouse embryonic stem cells.DNA 损伤诱导的 Cdc25A 降解不会导致小鼠胚胎干细胞中 Cdk2 活性的抑制。
Stem Cells. 2010 Mar 31;28(3):450-61. doi: 10.1002/stem.311.

本文引用的文献

1
The ATR inhibitor VE-821 increases the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to cisplatin.ATR抑制剂VE-821可提高胃癌细胞对顺铂的敏感性。
Transl Oncol. 2023 Oct;36:101743. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101743. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
ATR inhibition overcomes platinum tolerance associated with ERCC1- and p53-deficiency by inducing replication catastrophe.通过诱导复制灾难,ATR抑制克服了与ERCC1和p53缺陷相关的铂耐受性。
NAR Cancer. 2023 Jan 11;5(1):zcac045. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcac045. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Phase 1 study of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.
贝佐塞替布联合顺铂治疗晚期实体瘤患者的 1 期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(4):520-527. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01406-w. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
C17orf53 is identified as a novel gene involved in inter-strand crosslink repair.C17orf53 被鉴定为一个参与链间交联修复的新基因。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2020 Nov;95:102946. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102946. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis are not dependent on p53 prior to p53-dependent embryonic stem cell differentiation.细胞周期停滞和细胞凋亡不依赖于 p53 依赖性胚胎干细胞分化之前的 p53。
Stem Cells. 2020 Sep;38(9):1091-1106. doi: 10.1002/stem.3199. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Defined conditions for propagation and manipulation of mouse embryonic stem cells.定义了小鼠胚胎干细胞的增殖和操作条件。
Development. 2019 Mar 26;146(6):dev173146. doi: 10.1242/dev.173146.
7
Aldehyde Dehydrogenases: Not Just Markers, but Functional Regulators of Stem Cells.醛脱氢酶:不仅仅是标志物,更是干细胞的功能调节因子。
Stem Cells Int. 2019 Jan 13;2019:3904645. doi: 10.1155/2019/3904645. eCollection 2019.
8
DNA and chromosome damage induced by bleomycin in mammalian cells: An update.哺乳动物细胞中博莱霉素诱导的 DNA 和染色体损伤:最新进展。
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;775:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Combined Ectopic Expression of Homologous Recombination Factors Promotes Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation.同源重组因子的联合异位表达促进胚胎干细胞分化。
Mol Ther. 2018 Apr 4;26(4):1154-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Sensing and Processing of DNA Interstrand Crosslinks by the Mismatch Repair Pathway.DNA 链间交联的感应和处理由错配修复途径完成。
Cell Rep. 2017 Oct 31;21(5):1375-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.032.