• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所排斥量表(WOS)的意大利语验证

Italian validation of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS).

作者信息

Colledani Daiana, De Carlo Alessandro, Falvo Rossella, Capozza Dora

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1584118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584118. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584118
PMID:40463300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131874/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS), developed by Ferris and colleagues. Workplace ostracism (WO)-the perception of being ignored or excluded by colleagues or supervisors-is a painful experience that negatively impacts employees and the whole organization. We tested the unidimensional structure of the Italian WOS, its independence of social desirability issues, and invariance across genders and ages. We also tested the nomological validity of the WOS by considering ostracism as a job demand and including it in the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory.

METHOD

A sample of Italian employees ( = 653), working for different organizations in several Italian regions, completed an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Network analysis was applied to test the nomological validity of the scale.

RESULTS

Findings confirmed the unifactor structure of the Italian WOS and its invariance. Social desirability only absorbed a limited portion of variance of ostracism items. Data also supported the nomological validity of the WOS, that is, the expected association of ostracism with basic need frustration, lower work engagement, altruism, and performance.

DISCUSSION

In the discussion, we clarified the advantages of conceiving ostracism as a job demand and using network analysis to verify the JD-R theory. Practical implications of findings in order to contain workplace ostracism were commented.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在验证由费里斯及其同事编制的工作场所排斥量表(WOS)的意大利语版本。工作场所排斥(WO)——即员工感知到被同事或上级忽视或排斥——是一种痛苦的经历,会对员工个人以及整个组织产生负面影响。我们检验了意大利语WOS的单维结构、其在社会期望问题方面的独立性,以及在性别和年龄上的恒定性。我们还通过将排斥视为一种工作要求并将其纳入工作要求-资源(JD-R)理论,来检验WOS的效标效度。

方法

来自意大利多个地区不同组织的653名意大利员工样本完成了一份在线问卷。使用探索性和验证性因素分析对数据进行分析。应用网络分析来检验该量表的效标效度。

结果

研究结果证实了意大利语WOS的单因素结构及其恒定性。社会期望仅解释了排斥项目变异的有限部分。数据还支持了WOS的效标效度,即排斥与基本需求受挫、工作投入度降低、利他行为和绩效之间的预期关联。

讨论

在讨论中,我们阐明了将排斥视为一种工作要求并使用网络分析来验证JD-R理论的优势。对研究结果在抑制工作场所排斥方面的实际意义进行了评论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036a/12131874/0eb10b9e4d21/fpsyg-16-1584118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036a/12131874/236e33e4db15/fpsyg-16-1584118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036a/12131874/0eb10b9e4d21/fpsyg-16-1584118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036a/12131874/236e33e4db15/fpsyg-16-1584118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036a/12131874/0eb10b9e4d21/fpsyg-16-1584118-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Italian validation of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS).工作场所排斥量表(WOS)的意大利语验证
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1584118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584118. eCollection 2025.
2
"Exploring the relationship of organizational virtuousness, citizenship behavior, job performance, and combatting ostracism" through structural equational modeling.通过结构方程建模探索组织美德、公民行为、工作绩效与反排斥的关系。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;12(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01873-9.
3
Workplace ostracism in healthcare: Association with job satisfaction, stress, and perceived health.工作场所排斥与医疗保健:与工作满意度、压力和感知健康的关联。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 May;80(5):1813-1825. doi: 10.1111/jan.15934. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
The Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale: An Italian Validation.工作相关基本需求满意度量表:意大利语验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01859. eCollection 2018.
5
The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale.职场排斥量表的编制与验证
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1348-66. doi: 10.1037/a0012743.
6
Interpersonal Conflict and Employee Behavior in the Public Sector: Investigating the Role of Workplace Ostracism and Supervisors' Active Empathic Listening.公共部门中的人际冲突与员工行为:探究职场排斥和上级积极共情倾听的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;15(2):194. doi: 10.3390/bs15020194.
7
The association between workplace ostracism and knowledge-sharing behaviors among Chinese university teachers: The chain mediating model of job burnout and job satisfaction.中国高校教师工作场所排斥与知识共享行为之间的关联:工作倦怠与工作满意度的链式中介模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1030043. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1030043. eCollection 2023.
8
Intensity, intent, and ambiguity: Appraisals of workplace ostracism and coping responses.强度、意图和模糊性:对工作场所排斥的评价和应对反应。
Aggress Behav. 2023 Mar;49(2):127-140. doi: 10.1002/ab.22060. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Workplace ostracism influencing turnover intentions: Moderating roles of perceptions of organizational virtuousness and authentic leadership.职场排斥对离职意愿的影响:组织道德感认知与真实领导的调节作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Mar;243:104136. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104136. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Exploring the Relationship between Innovative Work Behavior, Job Anxiety, Workplace Ostracism, and Workplace Incivility: Empirical Evidence from Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs).探索创新工作行为、工作焦虑、职场排斥与职场不文明行为之间的关系:来自中小企业的实证证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;8(4):508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040508.

本文引用的文献

1
Consequences of Workplace Ostracism: A Meta-Analytic Review.职场排斥的后果:一项元分析综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:641302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641302. eCollection 2021.
2
Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial.网络分析:简要概述与教程
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Sep 25;6(1):301-328. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283.
3
An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.基于项目反应理论的青少年南方奥克斯赌博筛查修订版评分。
Assessment. 2022 Oct;29(7):1381-1391. doi: 10.1177/10731911211017657. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis.工作场所排斥的前因后果:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jun;105(6):577-596. doi: 10.1037/apl0000453. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review.与医生职业倦怠及其后果相关的因素:综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 25;8(11):98. doi: 10.3390/bs8110098.
6
The Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale: An Italian Validation.工作相关基本需求满意度量表:意大利语验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01859. eCollection 2018.
7
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
8
Job Demands, Job Resources, Burnout, Work Engagement, and Their Relationships: An Analysis Across Sectors.工作要求、工作资源、职业倦怠、工作投入及其关系:跨部门分析
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Apr;59(4):369-376. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000964.
9
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude.两种态度模型的有效性检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1981 Jul 1;16(3):323-59. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1603_4.