Fernandes Rodrigo Volga, de Oliveira Roque Santos, de Matos Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot, Gaspar Alexandra Passos, Laurentino Gilberto
Blood Flow Restriction and Exercise Research Group, São Judas University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Dec 19;97:101-114. doi: 10.5114/jhk/193490. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The elastic band (EB) may be an alternative for restricting the blood flow compared to the Kaatsu and clinical cuffs (KA and CC, respectively). However, the impact of the EB, the KA, and the CC on the blood flow during exercise remains uncertain. This study examined the blood flow (BF), the diameter of the brachial artery (DA), and blood flow velocity (BFV) during elbow flexion exercises using the KA, the CC, and the EB. Twenty-six resistance-trained men (age: 30.7 ± 8.7 years, body mass: 80.7 ± 15.5 kg, body height: 175.7 ± 6.5 cm) completed four sets of 15 repetitions of unilateral elbow flexion exercise at 20% 1RM. All protocols were set to the same perceived tightness (PT) based on Kaatsu optimal pressure (KOP). The BF, BFV and the DA were assessed at baseline, at KOP, and during the exercise sets. The BF and BFV were significantly reduced from baseline to KOP when the KA (67%, ES: 1.4, p = 0.0002; 24%, ES: 1.9, p < 0.0001) and the CC (70%, ES: 1.7, p < 0.0001; 31%, ES: 1.6, p < 0.0001) were applied, yet not the EB (49%, ES: 1.1, p = 0.103; 17%, ES: 0.7, p = 0.123). The BF and BFV increased from KOP to the fourth exercise set in all protocols with the KA (409%, ES: 2.4, p < 0.0001; 37.5 %, ES: 1.7, p = 0.007), the CC (377%, ES: 2.0, p < 0.0001; 55%, ES: 1.3, p < 0.0001) and the EB (411%, ES: 2.9, p < 0.0001; 43%, ES: 1.3, p = 0.002), respectively, with no significant difference between them (p > 0.05). The DA remained unchanged after all protocols (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the EB showed similar blood flow behavior compared to pressure-controlled cuffs.
与卡atsu训练法和临床袖带(分别为KA和CC)相比,弹力带(EB)可能是一种限制血流的替代方法。然而,EB、KA和CC对运动期间血流的影响仍不确定。本研究使用KA、CC和EB,在肘部屈曲运动期间检测了血流(BF)、肱动脉直径(DA)和血流速度(BFV)。26名接受过抗阻训练的男性(年龄:30.7±8.7岁,体重:80.7±15.5千克,身高:175.7±6.5厘米)以1RM的20%完成了四组每组15次的单侧肘部屈曲运动。所有方案均根据卡atsu训练法最佳压力(KOP)设置为相同的主观紧绷感(PT)。在基线、KOP和运动组期间评估BF、BFV和DA。当使用KA(67%,效应量:1.4,p = 0.0002;24%,效应量:1.9,p < 0.0001)和CC(70%,效应量:1.7,p < 0.0001;31%,效应量:1.6,p < 0.0001)时,BF和BFV从基线到KOP显著降低,但使用EB时未降低(49%,效应量:1.1,p = 0.103;17%,效应量:0.7,p = 0.123)。在所有方案中,BF和BFV从KOP到第四组运动时均增加,使用KA时(409%,效应量:2.4,p < 0.0001;37.5%,效应量:1.7,p = 0.007)、CC时(377%,效应量:2.0,p < 0.0001;55%,效应量:1.3,p < 0.0001)和EB时(411%,效应量:2.9,p < 0.0001;43%,效应量:1.3,p = .002),它们之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。所有方案后DA均保持不变(p > 0.05)。总之,与压力控制袖带相比,EB显示出相似血流行为。