Mani Shubhangi, Toshniwal Nandlal Girijalal, Goenka Yash, Navgire Nikita, Khurdal Ankita
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Maharashtra, India.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2025 Mar 31;19(1):46-56. doi: 10.34172/joddd.025.41487. eCollection 2025 Mar.
The present study evaluated condylar position changes using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in treating Cl II malocclusion with the twin block and clear functional jaw corrector (CFJC) appliances.
In this RCT, we included 60 patients, with 30 in each treatment group (control group: twin block appliance, case group: CFJC appliance), randomly allocated using a lottery system. A twin block appliance or CFJC was fabricated for each patient following the protocol. Pre- and post-treatment records were collected over twelve months at 0-, 6- and 12-month intervals using cephalograms, CBCT, and questionnaires assessing the patient perception of the appliance.
Both groups showed significant improvements in malocclusion. Cephalometric analysis showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in SNB, ANB, and U1-NA. In comparing the two groups, significant differences were found in Arnett's soft tissue parameters, including upper lip to E line, lower lip to E line, upper lip protrusion, upper lip length, lower lip length, lower 1/3 of the face, maxillary first incisor exposure, and mandibular height in the CFJC group. The intergroup comparison of projections to TVL (true vertical line) also showed significant differences across all parameters in the CFJC group. Furthermore, significant disparities in CBCT parameters were observed between the groups, specifically in condylar position, condylar height, and anterior joint space. Also, significant differences in patient comfort and perception of the appliance were observed, highlighting better compliance with the CFJC appliance.
The CFJC appliance is a top choice for Cl II malocclusion due to its superior effectiveness in skeletal, dental, and soft tissue improvements and significant condylar remodeling. Additionally, patients showed better compliance and acceptance of the CFJC appliance compared to traditional options, enhancing its clinical advantage in orthodontic practice.
本研究使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估了使用双阻板矫治器和透明功能性颌垫矫治器(CFJC)治疗安氏II类错牙合时髁突位置的变化。
在这项随机对照试验中,我们纳入了60例患者,每个治疗组30例(对照组:双阻板矫治器,病例组:CFJC矫治器),通过抽签系统随机分配。按照方案为每位患者制作双阻板矫治器或CFJC矫治器。在12个月内,每隔0、6和12个月使用头影测量片、CBCT以及评估患者对矫治器感受的问卷收集治疗前和治疗后的记录。
两组的错牙合情况均有显著改善。头影测量分析显示,两组在SNB、ANB和U1-NA方面存在统计学显著差异。在比较两组时,发现CFJC组在阿内特软组织参数方面存在显著差异,包括上唇至E线、下唇至E线、上唇突度、上唇长度、下唇长度、面部下1/3、上颌第一前牙暴露度和下颌高度。CFJC组与TVL(真正垂直线)投影的组间比较在所有参数上也显示出显著差异。此外,两组之间在CBCT参数上存在显著差异,特别是在髁突位置、髁突高度和关节前间隙方面。同时,观察到患者对矫治器的舒适度和感受存在显著差异,突出了CFJC矫治器更好的依从性。
CFJC矫治器是安氏II类错牙合的首选,因为它在骨骼、牙齿和软组织改善以及显著的髁突重塑方面具有卓越的效果。此外,与传统矫治器相比,患者对CFJC矫治器的依从性和接受度更高,增强了其在正畸实践中的临床优势。