Almufleh Laila S
Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, 11942, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Dent J. 2025 Jun 4;37(4-6):14. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00021-2.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been demonstrated to identify apical radiolucency with higher accuracy than two-dimensional radiography. The outcome of root canal treatment varies depending on the imaging modality employed. This systematic review aimed to: (1) estimate the success rate of nonsurgical root canal treatment and retreatment when assessed by CBCT and (2) investigate the influence of some factors suspected to be associated with treatment outcomes. An electronic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature. Article selection and data extraction were independently conducted by 2 reviewers. The terms 'strict' (complete resolution of periapical lesion) or 'loose' (reduction in size of existing periapical lesion) were used to describe the outcome criteria. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis and meta-regression established pooled outcome rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and significant clinical prognostic factors (P < .05). Nineteen articles were included. The overall quality of evidence was moderate. The estimated weighted pooled overall success rates for NSRCT and NSReRCT assessed by CBCT were 41.03% (95% CI: 28.68%-53.95%; I = 94.76%) under strict criteria and 85.01% (95% CI: 80.85%-88.75%; I = 68.36%) under loose criteria. This review's findings offer valuable insights to guide the design of future studies assessing root canal treatment and retreatment outcomes through CBCT. However, they should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective and heterogeneous nature of the data. Review registration: This protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews: the PROSPERO database (CRD42024591017). Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)已被证明在识别根尖周透射区方面比二维X线摄影具有更高的准确性。根管治疗的结果因所采用的成像方式而异。本系统评价旨在:(1)评估通过CBCT评估时非手术根管治疗和再治疗的成功率,以及(2)研究一些疑似与治疗结果相关的因素的影响。在以下数据库中进行了电子检索:MEDLINE、Embase、科学网、Cochrane图书馆和灰色文献。文章筛选和数据提取由两名审阅者独立进行。采用“严格”(根尖周病变完全消退)或“宽松”(现有根尖周病变大小减小)术语描述结果标准。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估纳入研究的质量。荟萃分析和荟萃回归确定了合并结果率、95%置信区间(CI)和显著的临床预后因素(P < 0.05)。纳入了19篇文章。证据的总体质量为中等。在严格标准下,通过CBCT评估的非手术根管治疗(NSRCT)和非手术根管再治疗(NSReRCT)的估计加权合并总体成功率分别为41.03%(95%CI:28.68%-53.95%;I = 94.76%),在宽松标准下为85.01%(95%CI:80.85%-88.75%;I = 68.36%)。本评价的结果为指导未来通过CBCT评估根管治疗和再治疗结果的研究设计提供了有价值的见解。然而,由于数据的回顾性和异质性,应谨慎解释这些结果。综述注册:本方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:PROSPERO数据库(CRD42024591017)中注册。临床试验编号:不适用。