• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复协作:心理健康专家使用康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS - DS)的经验

Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).

作者信息

Lam Hiu Yan, Honey Anne, Scanlan Justin, Hancock Nicola

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01476-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-025-01476-7
PMID:40465157
Abstract

The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) was designed as a tool to promote collaboration between mental health workers and consumers. However, many workers use it solely for its other purpose-as an outcome measure - and lack knowledge and confidence to use it collaboratively. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the strategies adopted by mental health workers who successfully utilize RAS-DS to facilitate collaborative recovery planning. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with expert collaborative RAS-DS users and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants described implementing a range of strategies to facilitate collaborative practice when using RAS-DS. These included strategies to both encourage consumers to complete RAS-DS in a meaningful way and to facilitate discussions about the results for consumer-driven goals and interventions. Findings provide guidance for mental health workers seeking to use RAS-DS collaboratively to support recovery.

摘要

康复评估量表-领域与阶段(RAS-DS)被设计为一种促进心理健康工作者与服务对象合作的工具。然而,许多工作者仅将其用于其他目的——作为一种结果测量工具——并且缺乏进行合作使用的知识和信心。本研究的目的是深入了解成功使用RAS-DS以促进协作康复计划的心理健康工作者所采用的策略。采用定性描述性设计,对RAS-DS协作使用专家进行了半结构化访谈,并运用定性内容分析法进行分析。参与者描述了在使用RAS-DS时实施一系列促进协作实践的策略。这些策略包括鼓励服务对象以有意义的方式完成RAS-DS,以及促进关于以服务对象为导向的目标和干预措施结果的讨论。研究结果为寻求通过合作使用RAS-DS来支持康复的心理健康工作者提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).康复协作:心理健康专家使用康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS - DS)的经验
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10597-025-01476-7.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
The experience of healthcare professionals implementing recovery-oriented practice in mental health inpatient units: A qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健专业人员在精神科住院病房实施以康复为导向的实践的经验:定性证据综合。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):287-302. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12985. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
5
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
9
Patient experiences of occupational formulation: It's about getting to know me.患者对职业规划的体验:这关乎了解我。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Oct;72(5):e70047. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70047.
10
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Collaborative Nursing Care on Health Outcomes of Mental Health Day Hospital Users: A Mixed Methods Study.协同护理对心理健康日间医院使用者健康结局的影响:一项混合方法研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;32(3):575-590. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13133. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties.严重精神疾病患者的个人康复自我报告结局测量:测量特性的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug;112:102459. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.
患者参与精神卫生保健-医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点:范围综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;45(8):794-810. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Feasibility of Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) for everyday mental health practice.日常心理健康实践中康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS-DS)的可行性
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 9;15:1256092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1256092. eCollection 2024.
5
Key Informants in Applied Qualitative Health Research.应用定性健康研究中的关键知情人。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Dec;33(14):1251-1261. doi: 10.1177/10497323231198796. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice.工作人员对影响使用 RAS-DS 支持协作式精神卫生实践的因素的看法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04996-2.
7
Evidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping review.循证实践模型和框架在医疗保健环境中的应用:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 22;13(5):e071188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071188.
8
The principles of recovery-oriented mental health services: A review of the guidelines from five different countries for developing a protocol to be implemented in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.以康复为导向的精神卫生服务原则:对五个不同国家制定在印度尼西亚日惹实施的方案的指南的综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0276802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276802. eCollection 2023.
9
Collaborative mental health care: A narrative review.协作式心理健康照护:叙事性评论。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 30;101(52):e32554. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032554.
10
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.