Suppr超能文献

2016 - 2020年中国人类狂犬病病例的特征、暴露后预防措施使用情况及临床特征

Characteristics, Post-exposure prophylaxis usage, and clinical features of Chinese human rabies cases, 2016-2020.

作者信息

Ren Qian, Chen Ning, Mu Di, Zhu Man-Tong, Shi Qing-Nan, Zhou Shi-Jian, Qin Hui-Jie, Li Si-Han, Chen Jun-Yuan, Li Yu, Yin Wen-Wu, Chen Qiu-Lan, Zhang Yan-Ping

机构信息

National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Department of Comprehensive Management, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jun 4;19(6):e0013089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013089. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rabies continues to pose a significant public health challenge in China. Here we reported the risk factors associated with the failure to initiate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) vaccination in China for period 2016-2020. It is essential for identifying strategies to decrease the incidence of these preventable fatalities.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 1,733 case investigations in China between 2016 and 2020. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify factors associated with the failure to initiate PEP vaccination.

RESULTS

A majority of the incidents (n = 1,295; 84.3%) involved animal bites, with dog wounds constituting 94.0% of these cases (n = 1,437). Domestic animals from the victims' own residences accounted for 48.5% (n = 690) of human rabies cases, followed by free-roaming animals at 34.4% (n = 489). Among the domesticated animals, 95.7% (n = 779) had not been vaccinated against rabies. Category III wounds were present in 66.1% (n = 952) of all cases. In the multivariable model, factors occupation, exposure category, and source of attacking animal were significantly associated with failure to initiate PEP vaccination. However, only 4.3% (n = 41) received rabies immunoglobulin (RIG), and a mere 1.2% (n = 11) underwent complete PEP vaccination in addition to RIG administration. The median incubation period for rabies was recorded at 72 days, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 35.0-173.0 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of individuals affected by rabies did not pursue PEP vaccination, especially those with category II wounds or those bitten by domestic animals from their own households. To decrease mortality from rabies, it is imperative to launch prevention campaigns directed at these groups. Furthermore, enhancing the regular vaccination of domestic dogs is crucial for long-term control of the disease.

摘要

背景

狂犬病在中国仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。在此,我们报告了2016 - 2020年期间中国暴露后预防(PEP)疫苗接种未启动的相关风险因素。这对于确定降低这些可预防死亡发生率的策略至关重要。

方法

我们分析了2016年至2020年期间中国1733例病例调查的数据。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析来确定与未启动PEP疫苗接种相关的因素。

结果

大多数事件(n = 1295;84.3%)涉及动物咬伤,其中狗咬伤占这些病例的94.0%(n = 1437)。受害者自家饲养的家畜占人类狂犬病病例的48.5%(n = 690),其次是流浪动物,占34.4%(n = 489)。在家养动物中,95.7%(n = 779)未接种狂犬病疫苗。所有病例中66.1%(n = 952)为Ⅲ级伤口。在多变量模型中,职业、暴露类别和攻击动物来源等因素与未启动PEP疫苗接种显著相关。然而,只有4.3%(n = 41)接受了狂犬病免疫球蛋白(RIG),仅有1.2%(n = 11)除接受RIG外还进行了完整的PEP疫苗接种。狂犬病的中位潜伏期记录为72天,四分位间距(IQR)为35.0 - 173.0天。

结论

大多数狂犬病患者未进行PEP疫苗接种,尤其是那些Ⅱ级伤口患者或被自家饲养动物咬伤的患者。为降低狂犬病死亡率,必须针对这些群体开展预防活动。此外,加强家犬的常规疫苗接种对于该疾病的长期控制至关重要。

相似文献

10
A multicentric community survey on animal exposures among humans in India.印度人群中动物暴露的多中心社区调查。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Sep;63(Supplement):S9-S14. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_374_19.

本文引用的文献

7
Rabies.狂犬病
JAMA. 2023 Jan 24;329(4):350. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22254.
9
United Against Rabies Forum: The One Health Concept at Work.联合抗狂犬病论坛:发挥同一健康理念的作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;10:854419. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854419. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验