Gao Yongjian, Zhao Chen, Li Pei, Luo Lei, Liu Liehua, Liang Lichuan, Zhou Qiang
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1, Shuanghu Branch Road, Huixing Street, Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03462-1.
Spinal fusion has shown satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of adult patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (LGIS), however, the efficacy of direct repair (DR) for LGIS has not been established, and there is as yet a few reports on it. To assess the clinical efficacy of DR with the pedicle screw-rod-hook (PSRH) fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in adult patients with symptomatic LGIS. A total of 140 adult patients with LGIS were enrolled from April 2009 to December 2018, of whom, 69 cases underwent DR using the PSRH system and 71 cases underwent TLIF, with clinical efficacy evaluated comparatively using clinical and radiological assessments. The patients in both groups showed satisfactory pain relief efficacy and improvement in lumbar spine function. Bone fusion rate was 97.10% in the DR group vs. 100% in the TLIF group. The range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segment was significantly decreased from 13.72 ± 6.73 preoperatively to 11.60 ± 9.70 at the final follow-up (FFU) in the DR group and lost in the TLIF group, however, that of the upper intervertebral space (UIS) in each group or between groups before and after operation did not differ significantly. Both DR and TLIF are effective for adult patients with LGIS. As compared with TLIF, DR is more effective in preserving the ROM of the operative segment yet with less impact on adjacent segments.
脊柱融合术在治疗成人低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱(LGIS)方面已显示出令人满意的疗效,然而,LGIS直接修复术(DR)的疗效尚未得到证实,关于它的报道也很少。为了评估椎弓根螺钉-棒-钩(PSRH)固定联合经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)对有症状的成年LGIS患者进行DR的临床疗效。2009年4月至2018年12月共纳入140例成年LGIS患者,其中69例采用PSRH系统进行DR,71例接受TLIF,通过临床和影像学评估对临床疗效进行比较。两组患者均显示出满意的疼痛缓解效果和腰椎功能改善。DR组的骨融合率为97.10%,TLIF组为100%。DR组手术节段的活动度(ROM)从术前的13.72±6.73显著降至末次随访(FFU)时的11.60±9.70,TLIF组则消失,然而,每组或两组之间术前和术后上位椎间间隙(UIS)的ROM无显著差异。DR和TLIF对成年LGIS患者均有效。与TLIF相比,DR在保留手术节段ROM方面更有效,对相邻节段的影响更小。