Teng Tian-Qi, Liu Jing, Wang Meng-Meng, Yu Hai-Chu
Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):2085. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23376-x.
Chronic pain is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, the impact of dynamic changes in pain site count and the interaction between pain and diabetes on CVD risk remain unclear.
The study was a prospective cohort analysis based on data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2020). Participants aged ≥ 45 years with follow-up data on pain, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were included, excluding those with CVD at baseline. Pain sites and counts were categorized, and changes in pain site count across waves 1 to 3 were assessed, dividing participants into four groups: Cluster 1 (n = 6477) with persistently low counts; Cluster 2 (n = 964) with a significant increase; Cluster 3 (n = 272) with consistently high counts; and Cluster 4 (n = 680) with a significant decrease. CVD was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed heart disease (including myocardial infarction, angina, coronary heart disease, heart failure, or other heart problems) and stroke. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between pain and CVD, and an additive interaction analysis evaluated the interaction between pain and diabetes.
13,492 participants were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 3,146 participants (23.32%) developed incident CVD. Cox regression showed that pain was associated with a 28% higher risk of CVD (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.41). When pain affected more than six sites, CVD risk increased by 64% (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.44-1.87). Participants with consistently high pain site count had the highest CVD risk compared to those with consistently low count (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.53-2.46), while those with a decreasing trend in pain site count had a lower risk (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.26-1.78). Interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between pain and diabetes in predicting CVD, contributing an additional 35% risk (RERI 0.35, AP 0.2, S 1.9).
The number of pain sites and its dynamic changes are closely associated with CVD risk, and the synergistic effect of pain and diabetes requires more attention.
慢性疼痛是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个重要危险因素。然而,疼痛部位数量的动态变化以及疼痛与糖尿病之间的相互作用对心血管疾病风险的影响仍不明确。
本研究是一项基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS,2011 - 2020年)数据的前瞻性队列分析。纳入年龄≥45岁且有疼痛、糖尿病和心血管疾病(CVD)随访数据的参与者,排除基线时患有心血管疾病的人。对疼痛部位和数量进行分类,评估第1波至第3波期间疼痛部位数量的变化,将参与者分为四组:第1组(n = 6477)疼痛部位数量持续较低;第2组(n = 964)疼痛部位数量显著增加;第3组(n = 272)疼痛部位数量持续较高;第4组(n = 680)疼痛部位数量显著减少。心血管疾病定义为自我报告的医生诊断的心脏病(包括心肌梗死、心绞痛、冠心病、心力衰竭或其他心脏问题)和中风。采用Cox回归评估疼痛与心血管疾病之间的关系,并进行相加交互作用分析以评估疼痛与糖尿病之间的相互作用。
共纳入13492名参与者。中位随访9年,3146名参与者(23.32%)发生新发心血管疾病。Cox回归显示,疼痛与心血管疾病风险高28%相关(风险比[HR] 1.28,95%置信区间[CI] 1.18 - 1.41)。当疼痛影响超过六个部位时,心血管疾病风险增加64%(HR 1.64,95% CI 1.44 - 1.87)。与疼痛部位数量持续较低的参与者相比,疼痛部位数量持续较高的参与者心血管疾病风险最高(HR 1.94,95% CI 1.53 - 2.46),而疼痛部位数量呈下降趋势的参与者风险较低(HR 1.49,95% CI 1.26 - 1.78)。交互作用分析显示,疼痛与糖尿病在预测心血管疾病方面存在显著交互作用,额外增加35%的风险(相对超额危险度增量[RERI] 0.35,归因比例[AP] 0.2,协同指数[S] 1.9)。
疼痛部位数量及其动态变化与心血管疾病风险密切相关,疼痛与糖尿病的协同作用需要更多关注。