Suppr超能文献

一种用于理解学校缺勤情况的工具的验证:修订版适应学校拒学评估量表的瑞典语版本。

Validation of an instrument for understanding school absence: the Swedish version of the adapted school refusal assessment scale-revised.

作者信息

Strömbeck Johan, Heyne David, Ferrer-Wreder Laura, Alanko Katarina

机构信息

Faculty of Arts, Psychology and Theology, Åbo Akademi University, Fabriksgatan 2, Åbo, 20500, Finland.

Magelungen Utveckling AB, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;13(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02936-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised (SRAS-R) is a widely used measure to understand school attendance problems. However, previous evaluations have yielded inconsistent findings on the factor structure.

METHODS

We prepared a Swedish translation of the original SRAS-R plus the eight alternative items in the adapted versions of the SRAS-R (i.e., the A-SRAS-R). Subsequently, we tested the Swedish A-SRAS-R in a pilot testing, evaluated its factor structure, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and compared the model fit and internal consistency with the SRAS-R. Participants were students (n = 399) aged 12-16 years (M = 14.7, SD = 0.9) and their parents (n = 251).

RESULTS

Results supported a four-factor solution of the A-SRAS-R. However, the fourth factor was non-optimal concerning factor loadings and reliability. We found consistent evidence of convergent validity, and inconsistent evidence of discriminant validity.

CONCLUSION

The results provide support for the A-SRAS-R being psychometrically sound, and superior in comparison to the SRAS-R. Notwithstanding the need for further development of the fourth factor, the A-SRAS-R appears to be a valuable instrument for understanding school absence among Swedish young people.

摘要

背景

修订后的学校拒绝评估量表(SRAS-R)是一种广泛用于了解学校出勤问题的测量工具。然而,以往的评估在因素结构方面得出了不一致的结果。

方法

我们对原始的SRAS-R进行了瑞典语翻译,并加入了SRAS-R改编版中的八个替代项目(即A-SRAS-R)。随后,我们在一项预测试中对瑞典语A-SRAS-R进行了测试,评估了其因素结构、内部一致性、收敛效度和区分效度,并将模型拟合度和内部一致性与SRAS-R进行了比较。参与者为12至16岁的学生(n = 399,M = 14.7,SD = 0.9)及其父母(n = 251)。

结果

结果支持A-SRAS-R的四因素解决方案。然而,第四个因素在因素负荷和信度方面并不理想。我们发现了收敛效度的一致证据,但区分效度的证据不一致。

结论

结果为A-SRAS-R在心理测量学上的合理性提供了支持,并且与SRAS-R相比更具优势。尽管第四个因素需要进一步发展,但A-SRAS-R似乎是理解瑞典年轻人缺课情况的一个有价值的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1245/12139280/3cbdd8e7cb8e/40359_2025_2936_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验