Hussain Ghulam, Arsh Aatik, Rehman Fazal, Khan Shumaila
Ghulam Hussain, DPT, MSPT. Physical Therapy Department, Mardan Medical Complex MTI-MMC, Mardan, Pakistan.
Aatik Arsh, DPT, MSPT, PhD. Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 May;41(5):1365-1369. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.5.9601.
To determine the immediate effects of muscle energy technique and conventional physical therapy compared to conventional physical therapy alone on pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at Physical Therapy Department Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from March 2022 to August 2022. A total of 50 subjects, aged 18 to 50 years with non-specific neck pain for ≥ 3 months were included. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups through lottery approach. Participants in experimental group (n=25) received muscle energy technique along with conventional physical therapy while participants in control group (n=25) received conventional physical therapy. Baseline and post-intervention (immediately after the session) neck pain intensity and neck ranges were measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale and goniometer respectively.
Mean age of participants was 32.30 ± 7.75. Of the 50 participants, 36 (72%) were male while the remaining 14 (28%) participants were female. At baseline, there were no significant differences (P>0.05) between experimental and control groups. However, at post-intervention, there were significant differences in pain intensity (p=0.024), cervical flexion (p<0.001), extension (p=0.003), left rotation (p<0.001), right rotation (p<0.001), left lateral flexion (p=0.027) and right lateral flexion (p<0.001) ROMs between experimental and control groups.
Muscle energy technique along with conventional physical therapy is more effective in decreasing neck pain and improving cervical ROM compared to conventional physical therapy alone in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Reference No.: IRCT20220209053976N1).
比较肌肉能量技术联合传统物理治疗与单纯传统物理治疗对慢性机械性颈痛患者疼痛和活动范围(ROM)的即时影响。
2022年3月至2022年8月在白沙瓦哈亚塔巴德医疗中心物理治疗科进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入了50名年龄在18至50岁、非特异性颈部疼痛≥3个月的受试者。通过抽签法将参与者随机分为两组。实验组(n = 25)的参与者接受肌肉能量技术联合传统物理治疗,而对照组(n = 25)的参与者接受传统物理治疗。分别采用数字疼痛评分量表和角度计测量基线和干预后(治疗结束后立即)的颈部疼痛强度和颈部活动范围。
参与者的平均年龄为32.30±7.75岁。在50名参与者中,36名(72%)为男性,其余14名(28%)为女性。在基线时,实验组和对照组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在干预后,实验组和对照组在疼痛强度(p = 0.024)、颈椎前屈(p<0.001)、后伸(p = 0.003)、左旋(p<0.001)、右旋(p<0.001)、左侧侧屈(p = 0.027)和右侧侧屈(p<0.001)的活动范围方面存在显著差异。
对于慢性机械性颈痛患者,与单纯传统物理治疗相比,肌肉能量技术联合传统物理治疗在减轻颈部疼痛和改善颈椎活动范围方面更有效。伊朗临床试验注册中心(注册号:IRCT20220209053976N1)。