Sbardella Silvia, La Russa Chiara, Bernetti Andrea, Mangone Massimiliano, Guarnera Andrea, Pezzi Letizia, Paoloni Marco, Agostini Francesco, Santilli Valter, Saggini Raoul, Paolucci Teresa
Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences (DSMOB), G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;9(6):746. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060746.
Non-specific neck pain (NNP) affects 30-50% of the general population, and it often leads to severe disability. Several manual therapy techniques are available to reduce pain and disability and to improve cervical range of motion and functional activities. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) showed more evidence for treating such a disorder. The aim of this current scientific literature analysis was to compare the clinical effects of MET with the other manual or rehabilitative treatments for non-specific acute and chronic neck pain.
The literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar from 2010 to January 2020. Clinical trials about MET were included. The quality of the trials was assessed according to the PEDro scale.
Twenty-one papers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected: 15 studies about non-specific acute neck pain and 6 studies about non-specific chronic neck pain.
This analysis suggests that the MET approach has a good clinical effect on reducing neck pain in patients with acute neck pain and improves cervical range of motion in patients with chronic neck pain, and is better if combined with a traditional rehabilitative approach. This review's findings should be considered with caution for physiotherapy practice because of the studies' methodologic limitations. On the basis of the current available and limited evidence, clinicians could combine MET with traditional physiotherapy and other manual techniques when treating people with non-specific neck pain.
非特异性颈部疼痛(NNP)影响着30%至50%的普通人群,且常常导致严重残疾。有多种手法治疗技术可用于减轻疼痛和残疾,改善颈椎活动范围和功能活动。肌肉能量技术(MET)在治疗此类疾病方面有更多证据支持。本次科学文献分析的目的是比较MET与其他手法或康复治疗对非特异性急慢性颈部疼痛的临床效果。
使用以下数据库进行文献检索:2010年至2020年1月期间的PubMed、Medline、PEDro、Cochrane数据库和谷歌学术。纳入关于MET的临床试验。根据PEDro量表评估试验质量。
根据纳入和排除标准选择了21篇论文:15项关于非特异性急性颈部疼痛的研究和6项关于非特异性慢性颈部疼痛的研究。
该分析表明,MET方法对减轻急性颈部疼痛患者的颈部疼痛有良好的临床效果,对改善慢性颈部疼痛患者的颈椎活动范围有效果,且与传统康复方法联合使用效果更佳。由于研究的方法学局限性,本综述的结果在物理治疗实践中应谨慎考虑。基于目前可得的有限证据,临床医生在治疗非特异性颈部疼痛患者时可将MET与传统物理治疗及其他手法技术相结合。