Suppr超能文献

使用手持测力计评估老年人等长下肢力量的相对有效性和可靠性。

Relative Validity and Reliability of Isometric Lower Extremity Strength Assessment in Older Adults by Using a Handheld Dynamometer.

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sports Health. 2022 Nov-Dec;14(6):899-905. doi: 10.1177/19417381211063847. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Handheld dynamometry (HHD) is a practical alternative to traditional testing of lower extremity strength. However, its reliability and validity across different populations and settings are not clear.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that HHD is a valid and reliable device to assess lower extremity strength in a population of older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional/cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

This study included 258 older adults (≥65 years). Isometric knee extension and flexion force were measured by 1 examiner, using an HHD (n = 222), including 3 repetitions to calculate within-day intrarater reliability. These measurements were repeated by the examiner in a subgroup (n = 23) to analyze intrarater reliability over a test-retest period of on average 8 weeks. In addition, HHD force measures were performed by a second examiner (n = 29) to analyze interrater reliability. In another subgroup (n = 77), isometric knee extension and flexion torque were measured by 1 examiner using both the HHD and Biodex System 4 to assess relative validity.

RESULTS

HHD and Biodex measurements were highly correlated and showed excellent concurrent validity. HHD systematically overestimated torque as compared with Biodex by 8 N·m on average. Same-day intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.97 to 0.98. Interrater reliability ICCs ranged from 0.83 to 0.95.

CONCLUSION

HHD represents a reliable and valid alternative to Biodex to rank individuals on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, because of the high validity and reliability. The HHD is less suited for absolute strength assessment because of significant systematic overestimations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians are encouraged to use HHD to rank older adults on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, but not to compare readings with cut-offs or normative values.

摘要

背景

手持式测力计(HHD)是一种替代传统下肢力量测试的实用方法。然而,其在不同人群和环境下的可靠性和有效性尚不清楚。

假设

我们假设 HHD 是一种评估老年人下肢力量的有效且可靠的设备。

研究设计

横断面/队列研究。

证据水平

3 级。

方法

本研究纳入了 258 名老年人(≥65 岁)。由 1 名检查者使用 HHD 测量等长膝关节伸展和屈曲力(n = 222),包括 3 次重复以计算日内组内可靠性。在一个亚组(n = 23)中,检查者在平均 8 周的测试-再测试期间重复这些测量以分析组内可靠性。此外,由第二名检查者(n = 29)对 HHD 力测量进行分析,以评估组间可靠性。在另一个亚组(n = 77)中,由 1 名检查者使用 HHD 和 Biodex System 4 同时测量等长膝关节伸展和屈曲扭矩,以评估相对有效性。

结果

HHD 和 Biodex 测量结果高度相关,具有极好的相关性。与 Biodex 相比,HHD 平均系统地高估了扭矩约 8 N·m。当日组内内类相关系数(ICC)范围为 0.97 至 0.98。组间可靠性 ICC 范围为 0.83 至 0.95。

结论

HHD 是 Biodex 的可靠替代方法,可用于对个体腿部力量进行排名,或评估个体腿部力量随时间的变化,因为其具有高有效性和可靠性。由于存在显著的系统高估,HHD 不太适合进行绝对力量评估。

临床意义

鼓励临床医生使用 HHD 对老年人的腿部力量进行排名,或评估个体腿部力量随时间的变化,但不要将读数与截止值或正常值进行比较。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Dynapenia and aging: an update.动力下降与衰老:最新进展。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):28-40. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr010. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验