Smith Pamela, Sharmin Sonia, Ambry Dallas, Cox Allison, Hambrick Erin, Frederico Margarita, Mosse Holly
Berry Street Take Two Victoria, Richmond, Australia.
Department of Occupational Therapy and Social Work and Social Policy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria Australia.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2025 Jan 16;18(2):481-495. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention program Take Two; designed to address developmental trauma experienced by Child Protection clients in Victoria, Australia. Replicating a 2010 evaluation study of the program, we utilised a Time 1-Time 2 design to identify the impact of tailored Take Two treatments informed by the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics' (NMT™). Change in the overall sample was measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC; ages 8-16 years) and Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC; ages 3-12 years). In addition, a sub-cohort of children with severe adverse infant experiences was identified using a developmental history of adversity tool; Part A of the Neurosequential Network's Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics (NMT™) Metric. Treatment effects were also evaluated to determine the extent to which this potentially more vulnerable subgroup was improving. Significant improvement was found in the TSCC cohort (8-16 years) with effect sizes ranging from small to medium ( = 0.23-0.54) on TSCC sub-scales. The largest effects were found on Anxiety (0.54), which moved from sub-clinical to non-clinical. The TSCYC cohort (3-12 years) showed significant symptom reduction on all trauma scales with medium sized effects ( = 0.44-0.53), and the largest effect on Posttraumatic Stress-Total (0.53). In the sub-cohort experiencing moderate-to-severe adversity in infancy, effect sizes were small to medium ( = 0.15-0.59). Take Two interventions were associated with significantly reduced trauma symptoms even when children's adverse experiences in infancy were moderate to severe, highlighting the benefits of NMT™ guided systemic and individually tailored therapeutic interventions.
本研究评估了一项名为“Take Two”的治疗干预项目的有效性;该项目旨在解决澳大利亚维多利亚州儿童保护服务对象所经历的发展性创伤。我们复制了2010年对该项目的评估研究,采用了时间1 - 时间2设计,以确定依据治疗神经序列模型(NMT™)定制的“Take Two”治疗的影响。总体样本的变化通过儿童创伤症状检查表(TSCC;8 - 16岁)和幼儿创伤症状检查表(TSCYC;3 - 12岁)进行测量。此外,使用逆境发展史工具——神经序列网络治疗神经序列模型(NMT™)指标的A部分,确定了一组有严重不良婴儿经历的儿童亚组。还评估了治疗效果,以确定这个可能更脆弱的亚组的改善程度。在TSCC队列(8 - 16岁)中发现了显著改善,TSCC子量表的效应大小从小到中等(= 0.23 - 0.54)。在焦虑方面发现了最大的效应(0.54),从亚临床水平转变为非临床水平。TSCYC队列(3 - 12岁)在所有创伤量表上均显示出症状显著减轻,效应大小为中等(= 0.44 - 0.53),对创伤后应激总分的影响最大(0.53)。在婴儿期经历中度至重度逆境的亚组中,效应大小为小到中等(= 0.15 - 0.59)。即使儿童在婴儿期的不良经历为中度至重度,“Take Two”干预也与创伤症状显著减轻相关,突出了NMT™指导的系统性和个性化治疗干预的益处。