Schimmelpfennig Robin, Elbæk Christian, Mitkidis Panagiotis, Singh Anisha, Roberson Quinetta
University of Lausanne (UNIL).
Aarhus University.
J Manage. 2025 Jul;51(6):2460-2487. doi: 10.1177/01492063241305577. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Sampling data from organizations and humans associated with those organizations is essential to organizational research. Much of what we know about organizations is based on such work. However, this empirical foundation may be compromised, calling into question the field's theoretical and empirical findings. Studies often sample data from relatively similar, narrow contexts, so a lack of sample diversity accumulates in the discipline. To conceptualize this lack of sample diversity and examine its prevalence across research publications, we conduct a pre-registered systematic review of articles from 2018 to 2022 in six top management journals and another systematic review of articles from 2013 to 2022 in six additional journals (not pre-registered). Our review assesses sample country diversity while also exploring within-country factors that are relatively under or oversampled, such as the size or industry of the sampled organization. We find a lack of sample diversity, for instance, a strong bias toward WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) samples and an underrepresentation of small and medium-sized enterprises in organizational research. Based on the findings and past work, we introduce a conceptual framework for sample diversity along three dimensions: the sample's geographical, organizational, and personnel contexts. Additionally, we discuss factors that contribute to a lack of sample diversity and propose guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors to enhance it. Overall, this article seeks to improve the robustness and relevance of theoretical and empirical organizational research, thereby preventing the formulation of misinformed policies and practices in both organizational settings and broader societal contexts.
从组织以及与这些组织相关的人员中采集数据对于组织研究至关重要。我们对组织的许多了解都基于此类工作。然而,这一实证基础可能受到损害,从而使该领域的理论和实证研究结果受到质疑。研究通常从相对相似、范围狭窄的背景中采集数据,因此该学科中样本缺乏多样性的问题日益凸显。为了对这种样本多样性的缺乏进行概念化,并研究其在研究出版物中的普遍程度,我们对2018年至2022年发表在六本顶级管理期刊上的文章进行了预先注册的系统综述,并对另外六本期刊(未预先注册)2013年至2022年发表的文章进行了另一项系统综述。我们的综述评估了样本国家的多样性,同时还探讨了国内相对抽样不足或过度抽样的因素,如抽样组织的规模或行业。例如,我们发现样本缺乏多样性,在组织研究中存在对WEIRD(西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主)样本的强烈偏向,以及中小企业代表性不足的问题。基于这些发现和以往的研究,我们引入了一个关于样本多样性的概念框架,该框架涵盖三个维度:样本的地理、组织和人员背景。此外,我们讨论了导致样本缺乏多样性的因素,并为作者、审稿人和编辑提出了增强样本多样性的指导方针。总体而言,本文旨在提高组织理论和实证研究的稳健性和相关性,从而避免在组织环境和更广泛的社会背景中制定错误的政策和做法。