Department of Organizational Behavior, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Chavannes-près-Renens, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Department of Biology, McGill University, Dr Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Canada H3A 1B1.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 31;377(1843):20200316. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0316. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
Human societies are collective brains. People within every society have cultural brains-brains that have evolved to selectively seek out adaptive knowledge and socially transmit solutions. Innovations emerge at a population level through the transmission of serendipitous mistakes, incremental improvements and novel recombinations. The rate of innovation through these mechanisms is a function of (1) a society's size and interconnectedness (sociality), which affects the number of models available for learning; (2) fidelity of information transmission, which affects how much information is lost during social learning; and (3) cultural trait diversity, which affects the range of possible solutions available for recombination. In general, and perhaps surprisingly, all three levers can increase and harm innovation by creating challenges around coordination, conformity and communication. Here, we focus on the 'paradox of diversity'-that cultural trait diversity offers the largest potential for empowering innovation, but also poses difficult challenges at both an organizational and societal level. We introduce 'cultural evolvability' as a framework for tackling these challenges, with implications for entrepreneurship, polarization and a nuanced understanding of the effects of diversity. This framework can guide researchers and practitioners in how to reap the benefits of diversity by reducing costs. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines'.
人类社会是集体大脑。每个社会中的人都有文化大脑——这些大脑进化到可以选择性地寻找适应性知识,并在社会中传播解决方案。创新是通过这些机制在群体水平上涌现出来的,包括偶然错误的传播、渐进式改进和新颖的重组。通过这些机制的创新速度是(1)社会的规模和互联性(社会性)的函数,这影响了可供学习的模型数量;(2)信息传播的保真度,这影响了社会学习过程中信息的损失量;以及(3)文化特征多样性,这影响了可供重组的可能解决方案的范围。一般来说,也许令人惊讶的是,所有这三个因素都可以通过在协调、一致性和沟通方面带来挑战来增加和损害创新。在这里,我们关注的是“多样性悖论”——文化特征多样性为增强创新提供了最大的潜力,但在组织和社会层面也带来了困难的挑战。我们引入“文化可进化性”作为应对这些挑战的框架,这对创业精神、极化以及对多样性影响的细致理解具有重要意义。这个框架可以指导研究人员和从业者通过降低成本来从多样性中获益。本文是关于“动物、人类和机器中集体知识和累积文化的出现”的讨论会议的一部分。