• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨结构壁应力在急性单纯性B型主动脉夹层主动脉生长预后中的作用。

Investigating the role of structural wall stress on aortic growth prognosis in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

作者信息

Liu Minliang, Du Yuhang, Cebull Hannah L, Wu Yuxuan, Mazlout Adam, Kalyanasundaram Asanish, Agarwal Rishika, Dong Hai, Piccinelli Marina, Oshinski John N, Elefteriades John A, Gleason Rudolph L, Leshnower Bradley G

机构信息

Texas Tech University.

Emory University.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2025 May 16:rs.3.rs-6569327. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6569327/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6569327/v1
PMID:40470228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12136209/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

False lumen expansion is a major factor that determines long-term survival of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The objective of this study was to investigate whether structural wall stress distributions computed from patient-specific acute TBAD geometries can be used to predict aortic growth rates.

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography (CTA) of 9 patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD were obtained at initial hospital admission and at their most recent follow-up visits. Patient-specific structural wall stress distributions were computed from the initial baseline CTA using a forward penalty method. Spatially varying blood pressure distributions, derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations informed by patient-specific transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and blood pressure (BP) measurements, were incorporated into the forward penalty stress analysis. Aortic growth rates were quantified and visualized within the 3D TBAD geometries using the initial baseline and follow-up scans. Linear mixed-effects regression analyses were performed to evaluate the spatial correlations between biomechanical markers (structural wall stress, wall shear stress, and pressure) and aortic growth rates.

RESULTS

Utilizing initial baseline CTA, TTE, and BP data, the forward penalty analyses revealed hemodynamic and structural mechanics insights of acute uncomplicated TBADs. The linear mixed-effects model indicated that the fixed-effect association between structural wall stress and aortic growth rate distributions was statistically significant (p=0.039), which demonstrated that aortic segments experiencing high wall stress exhibited rapid growth. Fixed-effect associations were not significant when predicting growth rate using wall shear stress (p=0.86) or pressure (p=0.61) distributions. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients (p<0.05) were observed between structural wall stress and aortic growth rate in all patients.

CONCLUSION

High structural wall stress was associated with regions of high aortic growth rates, while false lumen thrombosis was associated with low wall stress. Structural wall stress derived from the forward penalty approach may be a novel predictor of aortic growth rate and failure of optimal medical therapy in acute TBAD.

摘要

目的

假腔扩张是决定单纯B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)长期生存的主要因素。本研究的目的是调查根据患者特异性急性TBAD几何结构计算出的结构壁应力分布是否可用于预测主动脉生长速率。

方法

在首次入院时及最近一次随访时获取9例急性单纯TBAD患者的三维(3D)计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)图像。使用正向罚函数法根据初始基线CTA计算患者特异性结构壁应力分布。将通过患者特异性经胸超声心动图(TTE)和血压(BP)测量结果进行计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟得出的空间变化血压分布纳入正向罚函数应力分析。利用初始基线扫描和随访扫描对3D TBAD几何结构内的主动脉生长速率进行量化和可视化。进行线性混合效应回归分析以评估生物力学标志物(结构壁应力、壁面切应力和压力)与主动脉生长速率之间的空间相关性。

结果

利用初始基线CTA、TTE和BP数据,正向罚函数分析揭示了急性单纯TBAD的血流动力学和结构力学特征。线性混合效应模型表明,结构壁应力与主动脉生长速率分布之间的固定效应关联具有统计学意义(p = 0.039),这表明承受高壁应力的主动脉段生长迅速。使用壁面切应力(p = 0.86)或压力(p = 0.61)分布预测生长速率时,固定效应关联不显著。所有患者的结构壁应力与主动脉生长速率之间均观察到显著的Pearson相关系数(p < 0.05)。

结论

高结构壁应力与主动脉高生长速率区域相关,而假腔血栓形成与低壁应力相关。通过正向罚函数法得出的结构壁应力可能是急性TBAD中主动脉生长速率和最佳药物治疗失败的一种新的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/29d09c518ab4/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/e6da8dde4350/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/c99a15dd3c34/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/7228515e9e7b/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/d38a1d04868a/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/5b8745900be2/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/15d312c7d821/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/12fd2916c649/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/f68c04988e79/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/e9f8b24f3f01/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/29d09c518ab4/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/e6da8dde4350/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/c99a15dd3c34/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/7228515e9e7b/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/d38a1d04868a/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/5b8745900be2/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/15d312c7d821/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/12fd2916c649/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/f68c04988e79/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/e9f8b24f3f01/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d0/12136209/29d09c518ab4/nihpp-rs6569327v1-f0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the role of structural wall stress on aortic growth prognosis in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.探讨结构壁应力在急性单纯性B型主动脉夹层主动脉生长预后中的作用。
Res Sq. 2025 May 16:rs.3.rs-6569327. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6569327/v1.
2
Initial findings and potential applicability of computational simulation of the aorta in acute type B dissection.主动脉急性 B 型夹层计算模拟的初步发现和潜在适用性。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2 Suppl):35S-43S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.061.
3
The incidence of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissections is underestimated.急性 B 型主动脉夹层延迟性并发症的发生率被低估了。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.089. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
4
Wall Shear Stress Assessment of the False Lumen in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Visualized by 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ex-Vivo Study.4D 血流磁共振成像对急性 B 型主动脉夹层假性腔的壁面切应力评估:一项离体研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021 Oct;55(7):696-701. doi: 10.1177/15385744211017117. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Outcomes of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection and High-Risk Features.急性 B 型主动脉夹层伴高危特征患者的转归。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;106:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Aortic Wall Enhancement Detected by Contrast Computed Tomography Scan Predicts Aortic Remodeling after Conservative Therapy for Acute Uncomplicated Type B Dissection.对比计算机断层扫描检测到的主动脉壁强化可预测急性单纯性B型主动脉夹层保守治疗后的主动脉重塑。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Exploring hemodynamic mechanisms and re-intervention strategies for partial false lumen thrombosis in Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic aortic endovascular repair.探讨胸主动脉腔内修复术后 Stanford B 型主动脉夹层部分假腔血栓形成的血流动力学机制和再干预策略。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Dec 15;417:132494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132494. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
8
The Role of Multiple Re-Entry Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection Progression: A Longitudinal Study Using a Controlled Swine Model.多部位再破口在 B 型主动脉夹层进展中的作用:应用可控猪模型的纵向研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Feb;31(1):104-114. doi: 10.1177/15266028221111295. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Effect of intimal flap motion on flow in acute type B aortic dissection by using fluid-structure interaction.利用流固相互作用研究内膜瓣运动对急性B型主动脉夹层血流的影响。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;36(12):e3399. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3399. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Baseline 4D Flow-Derived Hemodynamic Parameters Stratify Descending Aortic Dissection Patients With Enlarging Aortas.基于基线4D血流衍生的血流动力学参数对主动脉扩张的降主动脉夹层患者进行分层。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 9;9:905718. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.905718. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging and fluid structure interaction analysis to predict failure of medical therapy in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.使用四维流动磁共振成像和流体结构相互作用分析来预测急性单纯性B型主动脉夹层内科治疗的失败。
JTCVS Tech. 2024 Jul 5;27:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.06.019. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The role of anatomic shape features in the prognosis of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection initially treated with optimal medical therapy.解剖形态特征在最初接受最佳药物治疗的非复杂性 B 型主动脉夹层预后中的作用。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Mar;170:108041. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108041. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Hemodynamic effects of entry and exit tear size in aortic dissection evaluated with in vitro magnetic resonance imaging and fluid-structure interaction simulation.
体外磁共振成像和流固耦合模拟评估主动脉夹层入口和出口撕裂口大小对血流动力学的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 18;13(1):22557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49942-0.
4
Aortic Size at the Time of Type A and Type B Dissections.升主动脉瘤在 A 型和 B 型夹层时的大小。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug;116(2):262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.03.037. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Extended law of laplace for measurement of the cloverleaf anatomy of the aortic root.主动脉根部三叶瓣解剖结构测量的扩展拉普拉斯定律。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jul;39(7):1345-1356. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02847-5. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Advanced risk prediction for aortic dissection patients using imaging-based computational flow analysis.基于影像学的计算血流分析对主动脉夹层患者进行的高级风险预测。
Clin Radiol. 2023 Mar;78(3):e155-e165. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Repaired Type A Aortic Dissection: a Comprehensive Comparison With Rigid Wall Models.A型主动脉夹层修复的流固耦合模拟:与刚性壁模型的全面比较
Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 14;13:913457. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.913457. eCollection 2022.
8
False Lumen Flow Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Long-Term Outcomes in Uncomplicated Aortic Dissection.磁共振成像评估假腔血流与非复杂性主动脉夹层的长期预后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jun 21;79(24):2415-2427. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.017.
9
False lumen rotational flow and aortic stiffness are associated with aortic growth rate in patients with chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.慢性降主动脉夹层患者的假腔旋转流和主动脉僵硬度与主动脉生长速率相关:4D 血流心血管磁共振研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Mar 28;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12968-022-00852-6.
10
Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.在临床应用中对现成的统计形状建模工具进行基准测试。
Med Image Anal. 2022 Feb;76:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102271. Epub 2021 Oct 26.