Wang Yi, Har Chee Ern, Tan Sharon Hui Xuan, Cheng Hooi Swang, Ang Ian Yi Han
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, #09-01D, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, 65 65164988.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 4;11:e67725. doi: 10.2196/67725.
Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are effective tools for pandemic containment but often impose significant socioeconomic consequences that intensify over time. Public support and compliance to NPIs are crucial to ensure their effectiveness.
This study aimed to elicit preferences of a Singaporean population for the reintroduction of NPIs in response to the emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant during the COVID-19 endemic phase.
A web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted. DCE attributes reflected key NPIs implemented in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022, including mask wearing, dining restrictions, suspension of vocalization activities and large-scale events, quarantine after international travel, and mandatory vaccine boosters. Participants were recruited from a demographically representative online panel. Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed-logit model and mixed-mixed multinomial logit model.
A total of 1552 participants were included in the analysis. Overall preferences from the mixed-logit model showed that mask wearing was valued, both in public and indoors. Dining restrictions allowing groups of up to 5 people were preferred, but stricter dining restrictions allowing up to 2 people or no dining out were not favored. Prohibiting large-scale events was not preferred. Participants accepted quarantine at home but opposed quarantine in government facilities. Two classes emerged from the mixed-mixed logit model: class 1 ("Prefer NPIs") and class 2 ("Prefer No NPIs"). While class 1 (39%) was only opposed to a complete prohibition on dining in at food and beverage establishments, no NPIs were preferred by class 2 (61%). Both classes were not opposed to mandatory mask wearing, dining restrictions allowing groups of up to 5 people, and mandatory vaccine boosters. Sex, age, education, employment status, the number of COVID-19 vaccine shots received, and risk attitude were associated with individuals' likelihood of belonging to a specific preference group.
Following the emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant after a prolonged period of restrictions, less disruptive NPIs such as mask wearing indoors were valued by the public and should be swiftly reinstated. Adaptive strategies should be adopted for more contentious NPIs, such as strict dining restrictions and quarantine policies. Public preferences should be considered in the design and selection of NPIs for future pandemic containment strategies to enhance compliance and effectiveness.
非药物干预措施(NPIs)是控制疫情的有效工具,但往往会带来重大的社会经济后果,且随着时间推移会加剧。公众对NPIs的支持和遵守对于确保其有效性至关重要。
本研究旨在了解新加坡民众在新冠疫情流行阶段,针对新出现的SARS-CoV-2变异株重新实施NPIs的偏好。
开展了一项基于网络的离散选择实验(DCE)。DCE属性反映了2020年至2022年新冠疫情期间新加坡实施的关键NPIs,包括佩戴口罩、餐饮限制、暂停发声活动和大型活动、国际旅行后检疫以及强制接种疫苗加强针。参与者从具有人口统计学代表性的在线小组中招募。使用混合逻辑模型和混合混合多项逻辑模型进行统计分析。
共有1552名参与者纳入分析。混合逻辑模型的总体偏好显示,无论是在公共场所还是室内,佩戴口罩都受到重视。允许最多5人一组的餐饮限制更受青睐,但允许最多2人一组或禁止外出就餐的更严格餐饮限制则不受欢迎。禁止举办大型活动不受青睐。参与者接受居家检疫,但反对在政府设施中检疫。混合混合逻辑模型产生了两类:第1类(“倾向于NPIs”)和第2类(“倾向于不实施NPIs”)。虽然第1类(39%)仅反对完全禁止在餐饮场所堂食,但第2类(61%)更倾向于不实施任何NPIs。两类都不反对强制佩戴口罩、允许最多5人一组的餐饮限制以及强制接种疫苗加强针。性别、年龄、教育程度、就业状况、接种新冠疫苗的针数以及风险态度与个人属于特定偏好群体的可能性相关。
在长期限制措施后出现新的SARS-CoV-2变异株的情况下,公众重视室内佩戴口罩等干扰性较小的NPIs,应迅速恢复实施。对于更具争议性的NPIs,如严格的餐饮限制和检疫政策,应采取适应性策略。在设计和选择未来疫情防控策略的NPIs时,应考虑公众偏好,以提高遵守程度和有效性。