• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从新手到专家:准备你的同行评审。

From novice to expert: preparing your peer review.

作者信息

Proctor Diana M, Abraham Rachy, Righi Shannon Esher

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2025 Jul 9;16(7):e0043025. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00430-25. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1128/mbio.00430-25
PMID:40470933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252387/
Abstract

Peer review is the process by which the quality of scholarly work is assessed prior to being published, presented, or funded. The consequences of flawed research entering the public domain in the "post-truth" era highlight the need to improve peer review quality, which we believe can be achieved by standardizing training. Here, we aim to enhance the quality of published literature by presenting a systematic guide to train new reviewers (and aid experienced ones) in the art of peer reviewing the rigor of scientific manuscripts.

摘要

同行评审是在学术作品发表、展示或获得资助之前评估其质量的过程。在“后真相”时代,有缺陷的研究进入公共领域所带来的后果凸显了提高同行评审质量的必要性,我们认为可以通过标准化培训来实现这一点。在此,我们旨在通过提供一份系统指南来提高已发表文献的质量,该指南用于培训新的评审人员(并帮助经验丰富的评审人员)掌握同行评审科学手稿严谨性的技巧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ac/12252387/8b9ea3bf84a1/mbio.00430-25.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ac/12252387/22cdf8e7d4ea/mbio.00430-25.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ac/12252387/8b9ea3bf84a1/mbio.00430-25.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ac/12252387/22cdf8e7d4ea/mbio.00430-25.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ac/12252387/8b9ea3bf84a1/mbio.00430-25.f002.jpg

相似文献

1
From novice to expert: preparing your peer review.从新手到专家:准备你的同行评审。
mBio. 2025 Jul 9;16(7):e0043025. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00430-25. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials.同行评审员是否按照期刊的要求对报告项目进行评论?两项随机试验的二次分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 8;183:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111818.
3
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神:一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
4
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis.同行评审系统评价和荟萃分析时应考虑的最佳策略。
BMC Med. 2015 Nov 2;13:274. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y.
5
Peer reviewers' conflicts of interest in biomedical research: scoping review.生物医学研究中同行评审者的利益冲突:范围综述
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Mar 21;30(2):104-117. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112967.
6
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.用于提高生物医学研究报告质量的编辑同行评审。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000016.pub3.
7
Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.同行评议健康研究资助提案:有效性和效率创新的系统评价和系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 May 11;13(5):e0196914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196914. eCollection 2018.
8
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
9
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process.向审稿人支付报酬并规范论文数量可能有助于修复同行评审过程。
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 27;13:439. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.148985.1. eCollection 2024.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversial COVID study that promoted unproven treatment retracted after four-year saga.一项推广未经证实治疗方法的有争议的新冠研究在历经四年波折后被撤回。
Nature. 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-04014-9.
2
The Early-Career Editorial Board Reviewer Training Program: cultivating excellence in peer review.早期职业编辑委员会审稿人培训计划:培养卓越的同行评审能力。
mBio. 2024 Jul 17;15(7):e0176324. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01763-24. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses.社区开发的图像发布和图像分析检查表。
Nat Methods. 2024 Feb;21(2):170-181. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01987-9. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Problems with Peer Review Shine a Light on Gaps in Scientific Training.同行评审的问题揭示了科学训练中的差距。
mBio. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):e0318322. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03183-22. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers.跨平台撤回论文关注度的动态变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 21;119(25):e2119086119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2119086119. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
6
A Brief Guide to Statistical Analysis and Presentation for the Plant Pathology Journal.植物病理学杂志统计分析与呈现简要指南
Plant Pathol J. 2022 Jun;38(3):175-181. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.RW.03.2022.0043. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Key Factors for Improving Rigor and Reproducibility: Guidelines, Peer Reviews, and Journal Technical Reviews.提高严谨性和可重复性的关键因素:指南、同行评审和期刊技术评审。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 9;9:856102. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856102. eCollection 2022.
8
The "anti-vax" movement: a quantitative report on vaccine beliefs and knowledge across social media.“反疫苗”运动:社交媒体上疫苗信仰和知识的定量报告。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;21(1):2106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8.
9
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers.同行评审指南:研究人员入门指南
Reumatologia. 2021;59(1):3-8. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.102709. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
10
Guidelines for Reporting of Figures and Tables for Clinical Research in Urology.泌尿外科临床研究中图表报告的指南。
Urology. 2020 Aug;142:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 14.