McPeake Joanne, Ahmad Nahid, Bradley Kimberley, Morris Andrew Conway, Dark Paul, Graham Colin, Hall Walter, Moug Susan, Oakes Mark, Perry Emily, Stockley Simon, Weaver Jane, Connolly Bronwen, Lone Nazir
The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
The James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2025 Oct;80(10):1190-1198. doi: 10.1111/anae.16634. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
Sepsis is a high burden syndrome associated with increased morbidity and mortality in both the acute and longer-term phases of illness. Multiple treatment uncertainties remain that require resolution through high-quality research. This study aimed to identify the top 10 research priorities for sepsis research in the UK.
We conducted a priority setting partnership study co-produced by sepsis survivors, carers and clinicians. This included five stages: initiation of steering group formation and confirmation of the scope of the priority setting partnership; identification of clinical uncertainties through an electronic survey; analysis and verification of uncertainties; interim prioritisation to the top 25 ranked questions; and final prioritisation to determine the top 10 research priorities, using the nominal group technique.
Our initial survey respondents comprised 447/718 (62.3%) people who had survived sepsis, their friends and family members; 218/718 (30.4%) clinicians; and 53/718 (7.1%) multiple/other roles who identified 53 distinct research uncertainties. Our interim prioritisation survey comprised 429/941 (45.8%) people who had survived sepsis, their friends and family members; 431/941 (46.0%) clinicians; and 73/941 (8.2%) multiple/other roles, with the top 25 ranked summary questions taken forwards for final prioritisation. From these, final workshop participants (n = 27) agreed a top 10 list of research priorities. Improved sepsis diagnosis; characterisation and management of the post-sepsis syndrome; and non-antibiotic treatment of sepsis were the top three priorities.
We established priorities for sepsis research through a rigorous process of consensus involving sepsis survivors, carers and clinicians. These priorities will support future delivery of meaningful research to improve outcomes from sepsis.
脓毒症是一种高负担综合征,在疾病的急性期和长期阶段均与发病率和死亡率增加相关。仍存在多种治疗方面的不确定性,需要通过高质量研究来解决。本研究旨在确定英国脓毒症研究的十大研究重点。
我们开展了一项由脓毒症幸存者、护理人员和临床医生共同参与的确定研究重点的合作研究。这包括五个阶段:成立指导小组并确定确定研究重点合作项目的范围;通过电子调查确定临床不确定性;对不确定性进行分析和核实;将排名前25的问题进行初步排序;以及采用名义群体技术进行最终排序,以确定十大研究重点。
我们的初始调查受访者包括447/718(62.3%)脓毒症幸存者、他们的朋友和家庭成员;218/718(30.4%)临床医生;以及53/718(7.1%)担任多种角色/其他角色的人员,他们确定了53个不同的研究不确定性。我们的初步排序调查包括429/941(45.8%)脓毒症幸存者、他们的朋友和家庭成员;431/941(46.0%)临床医生;以及73/941(8.2%)担任多种角色/其他角色的人员,排名前25的总结问题被推进到最终排序。最终研讨会上,27名参与者就十大研究重点达成了一致。改善脓毒症诊断;脓毒症后综合征的特征描述和管理;以及脓毒症的非抗生素治疗成为前三大重点。
我们通过脓毒症幸存者、护理人员和临床医生参与的严格共识过程确定了脓毒症研究的重点。这些重点将支持未来开展有意义研究,以改善脓毒症的治疗结果。